The Effect Of Boiler Type, Unit Capacity, And Coal Calorific Value On Co? Emission Factors In Coal-Fired Power Plants: A Multi-Method Calculation Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v4i6.1432Keywords:
CO? emission factors, coal-fired power plants, the technical specifications of the plant, emission calculation methods, boiler type, generation unit capacityAbstract
This study analyzed the carbon dioxide (CO?) emission factors of 27 coal-fired power plants in Indonesia using three different calculation approaches sourced from the scientific literature. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy and sensitivity of each method and examine the influence of the technical variables of the plant, namely boiler type and specification, unit capacity, and type of coal calories, on the value of specific CO? emission factors. Data were obtained from accredited emission verification institutions and analyzed in a quantitative descriptive manner with ANOVA statistical tests and correlation. The results showed that the energy output-based method (t CO?/MWh) was more representative of the actual generation conditions, with an average emission value of 1.18 t CO?/MWh. Units with supercritical technology and a capacity of >300 MW tended to have lower emission factors. In contrast, the use of low-calorie coal produces significantly higher emissions. This study provides important recommendations for direct calculation-based emission calculations, selection of low-emission technologies, and the formulation of low-carbon energy policies to support the achievement of Indonesia's NDC.
References
Agency, I. E. (2012). Technology roadmap: High-efficiency, low-emissions coal-fired power generation. IEA. https://www.iea.org/reports/technology-roadmap-high-efficiency-low-emissions-coal-fired-power-generation
Agency, I. E. (2022). World Energy Outlook 2022. IEA. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2022
Agency, I. R. E. (2021). Renewable Energy Policies for the Energy Transition: Focus on Bioenergy. IRENA. https://www.irena.org/publications/2021/Apr/Renewable-Energy-Policies-for-the-Energy-Transition-Focus-on-Bioenergy
Branosky M., E. and S. (2019). Overestimation of Emission Factors for Certain Sectors: A Critical Review. Journal of Air Pollution Control, 48(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japc.2019.01.007
Change, I. P. on C. (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896
Change, I. P. on C. (2022). Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. IPCC. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/
Change, I. P. on C. (2023). Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. IPCC. https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647.001
Cheng X. and Wang Y. and Li J. and Shangguan Y. and Liu H. and Jiang J. and Yi P., K. and Z. (2023). Analysis of emission characteristics and driving forces of air pollutants and GHG from coal-fired industrial boilers in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 430, 139768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139768
Council, N. R., Earth, D. on, Studies, L., Sciences, B. on A., & Emissions, C. on M. for E. G. G. (2010). Verifying greenhouse gas emissions: methods to support international climate agreements. National Academies Press.
Fan, Y., Wang, J., Shu, G., Xiao, S., Eb, Y. J., & Sopian, K. (2025). A real-time correction model for carbon emission measurement data and carbon emission factors in coal-fired power plants based on data fusion. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 3001(1), 012033.
Feng X.K., R. and F. (2022). China’s pathways to synchronize the emission reductions of air pollutants and greenhouse gases: pros and cons. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 184, 106392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106392
Frey J., H. C. and Z. (2020). Evaluation of Uncertainty in Emission Estimates Based on EPA Emission Factors. Atmospheric Environment, 222, 117123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117123
Gao P. and Song D. and Chen B., T. and J. (2022). Tracking the carbon footprint of China’s coal-fired power system. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 177, 105964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105964
Gibon E. G. and Arvesen A. and Singh B. and Verones F., T. and H. (2015). Carbon footprint of electricity generation: A global meta-analysis. Environmental Research Letters, 10(3), 034003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/3/034003
Go?asa, P., Wysoki?ski, M., Bie?kowska-Go?asa, W., Gradziuk, P., Golonko, M., Gradziuk, B., Siedlecka, A., & Gromada, A. (2021). Sources of greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture, with particular emphasis on emissions from energy used. Energies, 14(13), 3784.
Hou B. and Cheng Y., H. and X. (2023). Analysis of Carbon Emissions and Emission Reduction from Coal-Fired Power Plants Based on Dual Carbon Targets. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097369
Hu Y., Y. and S. (2021). Estimating CO2 Emissions from Large Scale Coal-Fired Power Plants Using OCO-2 Observations and Emission Inventories. Atmosphere, 12, 811. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12070811
Jeong D. H. and Roh J. H. and Park J. B., W. C. and L. (2022). Scenario Analysis of the GHG Emissions in the Electricity Sector through 2030 in South Korea Considering Updated NDC. Energies, 15, 3310. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15093310
Stephenson, T., Valle, J. E., & Riera-Palou, X. (2011). Modeling the relative GHG emissions of conventional and shale gas production. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(24), 10757–10764.
Tubiello, F. N., Salvatore, M., Rossi, S., Ferrara, A., Fitton, N., & Smith, P. (2013). The FAOSTAT database of greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture. Environmental Research Letters, 8(1), 015009.
Whitaker, M., Heath, G. A., O’Donoughue, P., & Vorum, M. (2012). Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of coal?fired electricity generation: Systematic review and harmonization. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 16, S53–S72.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Bayu Sukma, Gabriel Andari Kristanto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.