ANALYSIS OF
THE INFLUENCE OF NUTRITIONAL STATUS VARIABLES AND ENVIRONMENTAL SANITATION ON
THE EVENT OF DIARRHOUS TO CHILDREN
Feni Astiti1, Reni
Zuraida2, Samsul Bakri3, Khairunnisa Berawi4
Environmental
Science Study Program, The Graduate Program, Lampung University1,2,3,4
Faculty of
Medicine, Lampung University2,4
Department of
Forestry, Faculty of Agriculture, Lampung University3
[email protected]1, [email protected]2,
[email protected]3,
[email protected]3
![]()
Received: 07-10-2022 ������������������ ������������� Accepted: 13-10-2022 �������������������� ����������� Published: 11-11-2022������
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Diarrhea in 2019 became the second
leading cause of death in children under five. The causes of diarrhoea include
infection, malabsorption, and food and are influenced by several factors such
as behavioural, nutritional, environmental, and socioeconomic factors. This
study aimed to analyze the effect of variables on nutritional status and
environmental sanitation on the incidence of diarrhoea in children under five
in the South Lampung Regency. Method: This study is survey research with
a cross-sectional design and uses binary logistic regression analysis. The
samples taken were 380 toddlers aged 6-59 months. Result: 10 of the 21
predictor variables had a significant effect on the 5% significant level of the
incidence of diarrhoea, where there were nine predictor variables, including
poor/poor nutritional status, history of exclusive breastfeeding, clean water
sources from BOR wells, clean water sources from PDAM. mountain spring drinking
water sources, latrine facilities, septic tank facilities, managed waste
management, and the floor of a ceramic house can reduce the incidence of
diarrhea with odds ratio and [p=] values of 0.06[0.000], 0.33[0.017],
0.01[0.0000], 0.02[0.000], 0.02[0.004], 0.04[0.000], 0.01[0.025], 0.02[0.001],
and 0.10[0.000]. Toddlers living in noncoastal areas have a 1.08 times higher
chance of experiencing diarrhoea than coastal areas. In contrast, one variable,
namely the age of toddlers, can increase the susceptibility to diarrhoea in
toddlers with the odds ratio and [p=] values of 1.04 [0.007, respectively. Conclusion:
This study shows that the influence of nutritional status variables and
environmental sanitation has a great possibility to reduce the incidence of
diarrhoea in children under five, namely in the group of nutritional status
variables, including poor/poor nutritional status, age of toddlers, and history
of exclusive breastfeeding.
Keywords: Toddler Diarrhea, Nutritional Status, Environmental Sanitation,
Comparative Study.
![]()
Corresponding Author: Samsul
Bakri
E-mail: [email protected]
INTRODUCTION
Health problems during childhood can affect the
process of child development, mainly if the disorder occurs in the digestive
tract, which has an essential role in the absorption of nutrients. One of the
disorders in the digestive tract that is prone to occur in children is
diarrhoea (Unicef, 2020) ; (Bolon, 2021). Diarrhoea is an abnormal discharge of faeces
characterized by an increase in the volume and dilution of faeces and the
frequency of defecation (BAB) more than three times a day; in toddlers, it is
usually found more than four times a day without mucus. Diarrhoea in toddlers
will cause dehydration, and the wasted food substances needed by the body it
can interfere with growth (RI, 2018) ; (WHO), 2020).
In 2019 diarrheal disease became the second leading
cause of death in children under five years of age and was responsible for the
deaths of 370,000 children, which means more than 1,400 children die every day,
or about 525,000 child deaths every year with a total cases of diarrhoea in
children of 1,7 billion cases annually (WHO), 2020). The most common Source of diarrheal disease is water
contaminated with toxins from various pathogenic bacteria. Rotavirus and
Escherichia coli bacteria are the two most common diarrhoea-causing agents in
developing countries, including Indonesia. Diarrhoea due to water pollution
that occurs in environments with poor sanitation, both for drinking, cooking, and
washing (especially eating utensils), accounts for nearly 60% of deaths
worldwide (UNICEF), 2021).
Diarrhoea in Indonesia is an endemic disease that has
the potential to cause Extraordinary Events (KLB) (Ministry of Health,
2014). Based on Indonesia's 2019 health profile, it can be
seen that the frequency of outbreaks of diarrheal diseases fluctuated (up and
down). However, the case fatality rate (CFR) continued to increase. Outbreak
cases in 2015 reached 1,213 people, which occurred in 13 provinces with a
mortality rate of 2.47%. Furthermore, in 2016 there were outbreaks in 3
provinces with 198 cases and a CFR mortality rate of 3.03%. In 2018 there were
ten diarrheal outbreaks spread across eight provinces in 8 districts/cities,
with 756 sufferers and a mortality rate of 4.76% (RI, 2018).
The 2018 Basic Health Research (Riskesdas) reported
that the prevalence of diarrhoea in 2018 was 37.88% or around 1,516,438 cases
in toddlers. The prevalence increased in 2019 to 40% or around 1,591,944 cases
in children under five (Ministry of Health,
2014). In addition, Riskesdas reported that the prevalence
of diarrhoea was more prevalent in the under-five group consisting of 11.4% or
around 47,764 cases compared to other age groups. Based on the Indonesian
Health Profile, Lampung Province contributes to diarrhoea cases. South Lampung
is a district in Lampung Province.
Data from the South Lampung District Health Office in
2017 showed that the prevalence of diarrhoea in children under five was 11207,
which was 36%. In 2018 there were 10583; the prevalence was 24%; in 2019, the
prevalence was 6819, and the prevalence was 19%. In 2020 as many as 4638 with a
prevalence of 12%, and 2021, as many as 12205 with a prevalence of 18%; the
NumberNumber of children under five in South Lampung was as many as 93037
(South Lampung District Health Office, 2021). South Lampung is a district
where, administratively, most of the territory lies on the coastline. Based on
the Regency Regional Development Plan (RPDK) (2014), South Lampung has a
coastline of 247.76 Km2, which includes Katibung, Sidomulyo, Kalianda,
Ketapang, Bakauheni, Rajabasa, and Sragi sub-districts with an area of 173,347
hectares of seawater. South Lampung Regency has a land area of approximately
210,974 ha.
Factors related to diarrhea in toddlers include
infection, malabsorption, and dietary factors. Several factors can also affect
diarrhea, including environmental factors, behavioural factors, nutritional
factors, demographic factors, and socioeconomic factors (Palancoi, 2014) ; (Wasihun et al., 2018), (Demissie et al., 2021)
; (Anjar et al., 2020) ; (Nemeth V, 2022). Child nutrition problems are the impact of an
imbalance between intake and output of nutrients, namely, intake that exceeds
output or vice versa. One of the causes of nutritional imbalance in toddlers is
diarrhea (Marimbi, 2010).
Research conducted by (Wasihun et al., 2018) on 610 children under five in Ethiopia showed that the
problem of diarrhea and malnutrition in children aged 6-59 months had a
significant relationship, where around 27.2% of children experienced diarrhea
in two months. Weeks before the interview, the prevalence of diarrhea,
underweight, wasting, and malnutrition in this study were 36.1%, 37%, 7.9%, and
5.4%, respectively. Access to clean water is a significant problem in the study
area. Factors such as the type of drinking water source, mothers not washing
their hands, improper disposal of solid waste, and the age of children were
predictors of diarrhea.
The environment is one of the determinants of disease
occurrence (Blum &
Knollmueller, 1975). Factors that directly or indirectly can be a driver
of diarrhea include agent, host, and environmental factors. Host factors that
cause increased susceptibility to diarrhea include not getting breast milk for
two years, malnutrition, measles, and immunodeficiency. The most dominant
environmental factors are the means of providing clean water and the disposal
of faeces; these two factors will interact together with human behavior.
Suppose environmental factors are not healthy because they are contaminated
with diarrhea germs and accumulate with unhealthy human behaviour. In that
case, diarrhea transmission can quickly occur (RI, 2011).
The results of research conducted by Gali et al. The
2020 study of environmental factors related to the incidence of diarrhea in
Mataniko Honiara, Solomon Islands, showed that approximately half (45.9%) of
children under five years had suffered at least one episode of diarrhea in the
two weeks prior to the survey, of which 73.2% had not. have toilet facilities,
61.0% of households are built in low-lying areas (19 meters above sea level),
and 70.6% are located near rivers. The presence of stagnant wastewater, flies,
solid waste, and containers filled with water near the house, plus the distance
of the house from the river. Previous studies support that hand washing
facilities, latrine facilities, drinking water sources, and improper and rural
waste disposal have a significant relationship with diarrhea morbidity (Gali et al., 2020) ; (Getachew et al., 2018).
This study aims to analyze the effect of nutritional
status variables and environmental sanitation on the incidence of diarrhea in
children under five: a comparative study in coastal and noncoastal areas of
South Lampung Regency.
METHOD
The research was conducted from May 2022 to September 2022 in the working
area of the South Lampung District Health Office. The tools used in this study
were microtoise, weight scales, stationery, a camera, and a laptop equipped
with Minitab version 16 software.
This research design is an analytic observational survey research method
in a population. In this study, researchers analyzed the data collected for the
relationship between variables. Researchers use quantitative research with a
cross-sectional design to study the correlation between risk factors and their
effects (Hidayat, 2015). This correlation includes
independent and dependent variables, which are measured simultaneously.
This study's population was all mothers with children under five. They
lived in South Lampung Regency in eight sub-districts, consisting of coastal
areas including Kalianda, Rajabasa, Bakauheni, and Ketibung Districts. South
Lampung has 17 sub-districts. Noncoastal areas include the Districts of Natar,
Penengahan, Palas, and Merbau Mataram.
The sample in this study was mothers who had toddlers and were domiciled
in South Lampung Regency in these eight sub-districts, according to the
research inclusion criteria (mothers who had toddlers aged 6-59 months and
registered in these eight sub-districts).
The sampling technique in this study used proportional random sampling.
The sample size taken by proportional random sampling is calculated based on
the following formula:
![]()
Information :
N ������� = approximate
sample size
N ������� =
Population (37043)
Z �������� = normal
standard value (1.96)
P ������� = estimated
proportion of the variables studied (0.5)
Q ������� = 1-P
D ������� = level of
accuracy used (0.05).
The result is n=380,0703254, rounded up to 380 samples.
So, the sample in this study was 380 children under five. Furthermore, the
determination of the sample size for each sub-district is determined using the
following formula:
![]()
Information :
Nh ���� = Number of
samples/district
Nh ���� = Total
population/district
N ������� = Total
population
N ������� =
NumberNumber of samples
Sources of data used are primary data obtained from
respondents using questionnaires and direct observation of respondents.
The data in this
study will be analyzed using Binary Logistics Regression. Binary logistic
regression analysis is a statistical method that describes the relationship
between one response variable (Y) and several predictor variables (X), with the
response variable in the form of dichotomous qualitative data, which is 1 to
state the presence of a characteristic and 0 to state the absence of a
characteristic. (Hosmer Jr et al., 2013) .
Mathematically the postulates of the model to be carried
out are as follows.
1 -α 0 [NTRL_ST]i+ 2 [ GEND_BABY]i +α 3 [ AGE_INF]I+α 4 [
ASI]i + 17 [AREA]i+ 18 [D3_MOUNT]i+ 19 [ D3_RINGS ]i+ α 20 [D3_CMNT]i+ 21 [D3_BOR]i+ 22 [D3_PDAM]i+ α 23 [D4_WTR_MOUNT]i+ α 24 [ D4_GLLN]i+
25 [ WC]I+ α 26 [SPTICTNK]i+ α 27 [SPAL]i+ α 28 [ CMD5 ]i+ 29 [D5_SPAL_PVC]i+ 30 [WST_FIRE]i+ 31 [ WST_MNGED ]i +α 32 [ FLR_CMNT]i
+ 33 [ FLR_KRMK ] i+ξi
The dependent and independent variables
with a significant relationship with p-value < 0.05 were selected with the
help of Minitab 16 software. If the p-value < 0.05, H0 is rejected, meaning
there is a significant effect between one independent variable and the
dependent variable.
The
data that has been obtained will be translated into tabular form and processed
using Minitab 16. Through these steps:
a. Coding
to translate the collected data into analysis symbols
b. Data
entry to enter data into the computer
c. Verification
to enter inspection data visually against data that has been entered into the
computer
d. Computer
output, printable computer analysis results
The
data in this study were analyzed using Binary Logistics Regression. The steps
of data analysis carried out in this study are as follows:
1. Data
description analysis
2. Binary
Logistics Regression Analysis:
a. We
are forming a predictive model of binary logistic regression using all
predictor variables.
b. Using
the G test, they perform the significance test of all conjecture models with
binary logistic regression.
c. The
G test aims to determine whether there is an effect of the predictor variables
used together on the dependent variable.
d. The
Wald test selected a predictor variable that significantly affects the
dependent variable. Wald's test statistic was used to test parameter one
partially.
e. Determine
the best model.
f. Look
for the odds ratio value for each predictor variable that has a significant
effect.
g. Interpret
binary logistic regression models.
h. Performing
the suitability test of the binary logistic regression model using the Goodness
of Fit. test
The hypothesis to be tested in this study can be
expressed as follows:
H0: 1= 2 = 3= 4=....= 20=0 (None of the variables has a
significant effect on the incidence of diarrhea in the study area)
H1: 1≠ 2 3≠ 4≠....≠α20 0 (At
least one variable significantly affects the incidence of diarrhea in the study
area).
The optimization of model parameters was carried out using
Minitab 16 software. The significance level used was 5%.
RESULTS AND
DISCUSSION
1. Descriptive
Analysis
Table 1. Distribution of the Frequency of Diarrhea in
Toddlers
|
Characteristics |
N |
% |
|
Diarrhea |
|
|
|
No Diarrhea Diarrhea |
174 206 |
46 54 |
|
Total |
380 |
100 |
Based on the table above, data on the incidence of
diarrhea in the South Lampung district occurred in 206 children under five,
with 54%. In comparison, only 174 children did not have diarrhea in the Lampung
district, with 46% of a total of 380 children under five, with a percentage of
100%.
Variables causing diarrhea based on nutritional status
include the nutritional status of toddlers, age of toddlers, gender, and
history of exclusive breastfeeding. Based on the results of the study, the
frequency distribution of nutritional status was obtained as follows:
2. Frequency Distribution of Nutritional Status of Toddlers
Table 2. Frequency
distribution of nutritional status of children under five based on BMI/U. index
|
Characteristics |
N |
% |
|
Toddler
Nutritional Status |
|
|
|
Good Nutrition Status |
232 |
61 |
|
Poor/poor nutritional status |
148 |
39 |
|
Total |
380 |
100 |
Based on the Table of Frequency Distribution of Nutritional Status of
toddlers based on body mass index according to age (BMI/U) shows that toddlers
in the field are dominated by toddlers who have good nutritional status, as
many as 232 people with a percentage of 61%, then obtained as many as 148
toddlers who have poor nutritional status/ poor with a percentage of 39% of the
total 380 children under five with a percentage of 100%.
Table 3. Frequency Distribution of Gender
|
Characteristics |
N |
% |
|
Toddler
gender |
|
|
|
Man |
200 |
53 |
|
Woman |
180 |
47 |
|
Total |
380 |
100 |
Based on the Gender Frequency Distribution table based on the gender of
the toddlers, the male sex was dominated by 200 toddlers with a percentage of
53%. In comparison, the number number of toddlers with female sex was obtained
as many as 180 toddlers with a percentage of 47% of the total 380 toddlers with
a percentage of 100%.
Table 4. Frequency Distribution of
Exclusive Breastfeeding
|
Characteristics |
N |
% |
|
Exclusive
breastfeeding history Exclusive Breastfeeding |
258 |
68 |
|
No Exclusive Breastfeeding |
122 |
32 |
|
Total |
380 |
100 |
Based on the frequency distribution table of the history of exclusive
breastfeeding, it was found that toddlers in the field were dominated by
toddlers who had a history of exclusive breastfeeding, as many as 258 people
with a percentage of 68%, while as many as 122 toddlers who did not have a
history of exclusive breastfeeding with a percentage of 32% of a total of 380
toddlers with 100% percentage.
3.
Environmental
Sanitation Frequency Distribution
Variables
causing diarrhea based on
environmental sanitation include clean water sources, drinking water sources,
latrine facilities, septic tanks, SPAL facilities, SPAL construction
facilities, waste processing facilities, and house floors. Based on the results
of the study, the frequency of environmental sanitation characteristics was
obtained as follows:
Table 5. Distribution of Toddler Household
Frequency by Source of Clean Water
|
Characteristics |
N |
% |
|
Clean Water
Facilities |
|
|
|
Mountain spring ring well |
52 73 |
14 19 |
|
cement well |
120 |
31 |
|
Ground well |
34 |
9 |
|
Boreholes |
56 |
15 |
|
PDA |
45 |
12 |
|
Total |
380 |
100 |
Table of Frequency Distribution of Toddler Households based on
Clean Water Sources (SAB) is dominated by under-five households using clean
water sources from cement wells as many as 120 children under five with a
percentage of 31%. The table also shows that 52 toddlers, with a percentage of
14%, use clean water sources from mountain springs, 73 toddlers, with a
percentage of 19%, use clean water sources from Cicnin wells, as many as 34
toddlers, with a percentage of 9% use clean water sources from ground wells, 56
children under five with a percentage of 15% using clean water sources from BOR
wells. Meanwhile, 45 children under five, with a percentage of 12%, used clean
water sources from PDAM from a total of 380 under-five households, with a
percentage of 100%.
Table 6. Frequency Distribution of Drinking Water Facilities
|
Characteristics |
N |
% |
|
Drinking
Water Facilities |
|
|
|
Mountain spring Bottled water/
gallon |
54 142 |
14 37 |
|
Well water |
184 |
49 |
|
Total |
380 |
100 |
Based on the Table of Frequency Distribution of Drinking Water
Facilities, it is dominated by under-five households that use clean water
facilities using drinking water sourced from well water 184 with a percentage
of 49%. Under-five households that use bottled water/per gallon are 124
under-five households with a percentage of 63%. There are 74 families using
source A with a percentage of 37%, while the under-five households using
drinking water sourced from mountain springs are 54 with 14% of the total 380
families with a percentage of 14%. 100%.
Table
7. Frequency Distribution of Family Latrine Facilities
|
Characteristics |
N |
% |
|
Family
Toilet |
|
|
|
There are not any There is |
82 294 |
23 77 |
|
Total |
380 |
100 |
Based on the Table of Frequency Distribution of Family Latrine
Facilities, it is dominated by under-five households that already have
latrines, as many as 294 under-fives with a percentage of 77%. Meanwhile,
families who do not have latrines, 82 under-five households with 23%, and a
total of 380 households under five a percentage of 23%. 100%.
Table 8. Frequency Distribution of Septitenk Sarana Facilities
|
Characteristics |
N |
% |
|
Family
Toilet |
|
|
|
There are not any There is |
60 138 |
30 70 |
|
Total |
380 |
100 |
Based on the Table of Frequency Distribution of Septitenk
Facilities, it is dominated by under-five households that already have septic,
as many as 138 children under five with a percentage of 70%. Meanwhile, the
families who do not have septic tanks are 60 under-five households with a
percentage of 30%, a total of 380 households under five with a percentage of
30%. 100%.
Table 9. Frequency Distribution of Wastewater Sewerage (SPAL)
|
Characteristics |
N |
% |
|
SPAL |
|
|
|
Not up to standard according to health standards |
80 118 |
40 60 |
|
Total |
380 |
100 |
Based on the Table of Frequency Distribution of Wastewater
Drainage Facilities (SPAL), dominated by under-five households with SPAL by
health standards, as many as 118 toddlers with 60%. Meanwhile, families who do
not have SPAL by health standards are 80 under-five households with 40%, a
total of 380 under-five households with a percentage of 40%. 100%.
Table 10. Distribution of SPAL Construction Frequency
|
Characteristics |
N |
% |
|
SPAL
Construction |
|
|
|
SPAL Land Construction SPAL Cement Construction |
20 86 |
5 23 |
|
SPAL PVC Construction |
274 |
72 |
|
Total |
380 |
100 |
Based on the frequency distribution table for the construction of
wastewater drainage facilities (SPAL), it is dominated by under-five households
with SPAL for PVC/pipe construction, with as many as 274 children under five,
with a percentage of 72%. Meanwhile, in under-five households that have SPAL
for cement construction, there are 86 toddlers with a percentage of 23%, and in
under-five households that have SPAL for land construction, as many as 20
toddlers with a percentage of 5%, with a total of 380 households under five
with a percentage 100%.
Table 11. Frequency Distribution of Waste Management Facilities
|
Characteristics |
N |
% |
|
Waste
Management Facilities |
|
|
|
Any Collected and then
burned |
32 165 |
9 43 |
|
Collected and then transported |
183 |
48 |
|
Total |
380 |
100 |
Based on the frequency distribution table, waste management
facilities are dominated by under-five households whose waste management
facilities are collected and then transported by garbage collectors, namely 183
toddlers, with 48%. Meanwhile, in under-five households where waste management
facilities were collected and then burned, 165 under-five children with a
percentage of 43%, and under-five households whose waste management facilities
were only arbitrary were 32 under-fives with a percentage of 9% with a total of
380 under-five households with a percentage of
100%.
Table 12. Frequency Distribution of House Floor Facilities
|
Characteristics |
N |
% |
|
Home Floor
Facilities |
|
|
|
Ground Floor Tile/cement floor |
116 111 |
31 29 |
|
Ceramic Floor |
153 |
40 |
|
Total |
380 |
100 |
Based on the frequency distribution table for house floor
facilities, it is dominated by under-five households whose house floors are
made of ceramic, with as many as 153 toddlers at 40%. Meanwhile, in under-five
households whose house floors are made of soil, there are 116 toddlers with a
percentage of 31%, and under-five households whose floors are made of
tiles/cement, as many as 111 toddlers with a percentage of 31% with a total of
380 households with a percentage of 100%.
4. Results of Optimizing Model
Parameters the Effect of Nutritional Status Variables on the Incidence of
Diarrhea in Toddlers
Table
13. Optimization results of the Influence of the Nutritional Status Variable
Model on the Incidence of Diarrhea in Toddlers
|
Predictor |
Symbol |
Coef |
SE Coef |
Z |
P |
Odds Ratio |
95% Lower |
CI Upper |
|
Constant |
|
10.1473 |
2.11979 |
4.79 |
0.000 |
|
|
|
|
Toddler Nutritional Status |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Nutritional Status (0=poor/ poor nutrition) |
[NTRL_ST]i |
1 -2.75307 _ |
0.650974 |
-4.23 |
0.000 |
0.06 |
0.02 |
0.23 |
|
Toddler Age (Months) |
[AGE_INF]i |
2 0.0418622 _ |
0.0154063 |
2.72 |
0.007 |
1.04 |
1.01 |
1.07 |
|
Gender (0=Female) |
[GEND]i |
3 -0.101897 _ |
0.426485 |
-0.24 |
0.811 |
0.90 |
0.39 |
2.08 |
|
Breastfeeding (0=Not Exclusive) |
[breastfeeding]i |
4 -1.11630 _ |
0.466669 |
-2.39 |
0.017 |
0.33 |
0.13 |
0.82 |
Based on the optimization of the model parameters in
Table 13, it is found that parameter 1 is negative with an Odd Ratio = 0.06
with p = 0.000. Suppose other variables remain the same in toddlers with good
nutritional status. In that case, the chance of susceptibility to diarrhea will
decrease to 0.06 times that of toddlers with poor/poor nutritional status. This
decrease was statistically significant, as indicated by p=0.000 (=0.04% <
1%).
Conceptually, diarrhea with nutritional status has a
reciprocal relationship. Diarrhea can cause malnutrition, and vice versa;
malnutrition is at risk for diarrhea because the body's immune system decreases
(Septikasari, 2018). Infectious diseases such as diarrhea can worsen
the nutritional state, and poor nutrition can facilitate infection. Children
who suffer from gastrointestinal infections will experience impaired absorption
of nutrients that cause malnutrition. A malnourished person will be susceptible
to disease, and growth will be disrupted. Patients with malnutrition will experience
a decrease in antibody production and atrophy in the intestinal wall, which
causes reduced secretion of various enzymes, making it easier for germs to
enter the body, especially diarrhea. In malnourished children, diarrhea attacks
occur more frequently and last longer. The worse the child's nutritional state,
the more frequent and severe diarrhea he suffers. It is suspected that the
intestinal mucosa of malnourished children is susceptible to infection. In
well-nourished children under normal circumstances, there is a relatively rare
microflora due to the cleansing effect of many interrelated factors, including
gastrointestinal motility, gastric acid secretion, and secretion of mucosal
immunoglobulins. The situation is very different in malnourished children
because of bacterial contamination of the upper small intestine. This situation
can lead to diarrhea and fluid loss, a factor in children's malnutrition and
other causes of impaired absorption of food, fluids, and electrolytes.
Nutritional status in toddlers is one of the
benchmarks in assessing the adequacy of daily food intake and the use of
nutrients in the body. Nutritional status is also a person's physiological
state which can be seen from the relationship between intake and nutritional needs
as well as from the ability to digest, absorb, and use nutrients. Suppose the
child has poor nutrition that affects growth and development and daily physical
and mental function. In that case, the child will be affected by environmental
factors and lose the opportunity to develop normally. Hence, they are at risk
of retardation in the future (Ishud &
Romadona, 2020).
Research conducted by (Maarif & Nafies,
2021) shows a significant relationship between the
incidence of diarrhea and the nutritional status of children under five in
Tuban Regency with a p-value of 0.000. This study found that diarrhea is common
in children with poor nutritional status. Toddlers are an age group prone to
malnutrition, so the best indicator to measure the nutritional status of the
community is the nutritional status of children under five (Saputri et al.,
2015). Another study by (Ganguly et al.,
2015) in India proved that malnourished children had a
1.73 times higher risk of experiencing diarrhea than children with normal
nutritional status.
The optimization of the model parameters results shows
that parameter 2 is positive with an Odd Ratio = 1.04 with p = 0.007. If other
variables remain the same, toddlers one month older, the susceptibility to
diarrhea will increase to 1.04 times the original. Statistically, this increase
was very significant at the 5% level as shown by p=0.007 (0.8% < 5%).
Conceptually at a young age, children's body weight
contains more water used in the body's metabolism. ((UNICEF), 2021)This is in line with research conducted by
Dharmayanti and Tjandrarini (2020) using the 2013 Rikesda data on toddlers on
the islands of Java and Bali, showing that children aged 0-5 years are more
susceptible to diarrhea than those aged above (Dharmayanti &
Tjandrarini, 2020). In addition, children's immune systems are also
not perfect, so they are more susceptible to contracting diseases ((UNICEF), 2021).
Based on the results of the optimization of the
model parameters, it is found that parameter 3 is negative with Odd Ratio =
0.90 and p = 0.811. This finding means that if the other variables are
constant, the male toddler has a lower chance of getting diarrhea, which is
0.90 times compared to the female toddler. Statistically, the probability of
this decrease was not significantly different at the 5% significance level, as
shown by p=0.811 (81.1%>5%). This means that there is an equal chance of yes
or no.
Conceptually, gender differences may influence
individuals in activities, so they must be assessed and measured. According to
research conducted by (Gultom, 2021), the immune system of girls is lower than that of
boys, so girls are more prone to diarrhea than boys.
In line with this, research was conducted (Prawati, 2019). VI, Kelurahan Rangkah Buntu, Surabaya City, stated
that 50 people suffered from diarrhea more than women. Women are more at risk
of diarrhea because most women usually have more activity in the room, do the
less physical activity than men, and more often consume foods with excessive
spicy levels and snack indiscriminately. This can make women's immune systems
lower than men.
Based on the results of the optimization of the
model parameters, it is found that parameter 4 is negative with an Odd Ratio =
0.33 with p = 0.017. If the other variables remain the same, in toddlers who
receive exclusive breastfeeding, the susceptibility to diarrhea will decrease
to 0.33 times. This decrease was very significant at the 5% level, as shown by
p=0.017 (1.7% <5%).
Breastfeeding is a natural process that a child
needs because a mother's milk is a living fluid that contains protective
substances to increase immunity that will protect children from various
bacterial, viral, parasitic, and fungal infections so that children who are
breastfed by their mothers entirely for six months (Exclusive Breastfeeding
Pattern) are healthier and less sick than children who are not exclusively
breastfed (Widaryanti, 2019). Conceptually, breast milk is sterile and different
from formula milk or other liquids prepared with water or other materials that
can be contaminated in unclean bottles. Breastfeeding alone, without liquids or
other food and without using bottles, prevents children from the dangers of
bacteria and other organisms that will cause diarrheal disease (RI, 2018). The breastfeeding pattern is the habit of
breastfeeding mothers based on the NumberNumber of mothers breastfeeding their
children (Rahmawati, 2019)(Widaryanti, 2019).
Various studies on diarrhea in children under five
and its relation to exclusive breastfeeding have been conducted. One of them is
a study conducted by (Rahmawati, 2019) with a systematic review that took literature from
1980 to 2009, proving a relationship between the incidence of diarrhea and
breastfeeding patterns. The study explains that the risk of diarrhea in
children under five increases according to the breastfeeding pattern. This is
indicated by the Relative Risk (RR) in the predominantly breastfed group at
1.26, the partial breastfeeding group at 1.68, and the non-breastfeeding group
at 2.65. The risk of diarrhea, as seen from the prevalence rate, also increased
significantly according to the breastfeeding pattern. The predominant
breastfeeding group (RR=2.15), the partial breastfeeding group (RR=4.62), and
the non-breastfeeding group (RR=4.90) compared to the exclusive breastfeeding
group. Another research on the success of exclusive breastfeeding in the
community can be increased by strengthening the role of PKK mothers and
puskesmas cadres to minimize the incidence of diarrhea in toddlers (Zuraida et al.,
2022).
5.
Results of Optimizing Model
Parameters of the Effect of Environmental Sanitation Variables on the Incidence
of Diarrhea in Toddlers
Table
14. Results of Optimizing Model Parameters the Effect of Environmental
Sanitation Variables on the Incidence of Diarrhea in Toddlers
|
Predictor |
Symbol |
Coef |
SE Coef |
Z |
P |
Odds Ratio |
95% Lower |
CI Upper |
|
Environmental Sanitation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region (0=Coastal area) |
[ AREA ]i |
5 0.0793534 _ ������������� |
0.451141 |
0.18 |
0.860 |
1.08 |
0.45 |
2.62 |
|
Source of clean water (0=Earth Well) |
||||||||
|
Mountain Spring Dummy |
[ D1_MOUNT ]i |
6 0.901511 _ � |
1.07531 |
0.84 |
0.402 |
5.83 |
0.30 |
20.27 |
|
Ring Well Dummy |
[D1_RINGS]i |
7 -0.682706 _ |
0.786499 |
-0.87 |
0.385 |
0.51 |
0.11 |
2.36 |
|
Cement Well Dummy |
[D1_CMNT] |
8 -0.176658 _ |
0.747559 |
-0.24 |
0.813 |
0.84 |
0.19 |
3.63 |
|
Dummy Well Drill |
[D1_BOR]i |
9 -5,11332 _ ��������� |
1.23891 |
-4.13 |
0.000 |
0.01 |
0.00 |
0.07 |
|
Dummy PDAM |
[D3_PDAM]i |
10 -3.79945 _ |
0.992462 |
-3.83 |
0.000 |
0.02 |
0.00 |
0.16 |
|
Source of Drinking Water (0=Well) |
||||||||
|
Mountain Spring Dummy |
[D2_WTR_MOUNT]i |
11 -3.82617 _ |
1.32239 |
-2.89 |
0.004 |
0.02 |
0.00 |
0.29 |
|
Dummy Gallon/ Packaging |
[D2_WTR _GLLN]i |
12 0.175129 _ |
0.461069 |
0.38 |
0.704 |
1.19 |
0.48 |
2.94 |
|
WC/ Latrine |
[WC]I |
�13 -3.32966 _ |
0.826684 |
-4.03 |
0.000 |
0.04 |
0.01 |
0.18 |
|
Septitenk (0=Dododon't have) |
[SPTICTNK]i |
�14 -1.40321 _ � |
0.546534 |
-2.57 |
0.010 |
0.25 |
0.08 |
0.72 |
|
SPAL/ Drainage (0=Not up to standard) |
||||||||
|
Wastewater Sewer |
[SPAL]i |
15 -0.906861 _ |
0.592321 |
-1.53 |
0.126 |
0.40 |
0.13 |
1.29 |
|
SPAL/ Drainage Construction (0=Land) |
||||||||
|
Dummy SPAL cement |
[D3_SPAL_CMNT]i |
16 0.561020 _ �� |
1.19356 |
0.47 |
0.638 |
1.75 |
0.17 |
18.18 |
|
Dummy SPAL PVC |
[D3_SPAL_PVC]i |
17 1.25952 _ |
1.20288 |
1.05 |
0.295 |
3.52 |
0.33 |
37.23 |
|
Waste Processing (0=Any) |
|
|||||||
|
Dummy Garbage Burned |
[D4_WASTE_FIRE]i |
18 -2.38330 _ � |
1.25460 |
-1.90 |
0.057 |
0.09 |
0.01 |
1.08 |
|
Dummy Trash
Managed |
[D4_ WASTE
_MNGED]i |
19 -4.08319 _ |
1.25749 |
-3.25 |
0.001 |
0.02 |
0.00 |
0.20 |
|
House floor (0=Land) |
|
|||||||
|
Dummy Floor Tile/
Cement |
[D5_FLOOR_CMNT]i |
20 0.337830 _ |
0.703013 |
0.48 |
0.631 |
1.40 |
0.35 |
5.56 |
|
Ceramic Floor Dummy |
[D5_FLOOR_KRAMIK]i |
21 -2.34233 _ |
0.646784 |
-3.62 |
0.000 |
0.10 |
0.03 |
0.34 |
Log-Likelihood
= -88,319
Test that all
slopes are zero: G = 347,455, DF = 21, P-Value = 0.000
Simultaneous testing of
the diarrhea prediction model in South Lampung Regency using the likelihood
ratio test with the help of Minitab 16 software, the G test statistic value is
347.455, the World or DF test value is 21, and the p-value = 0.000, which is
smaller 0.05, so it can be concluded that the simultaneous testing of the
diarrhea incidence model with binary logistic regression with twentyone
significant predictive variables at the 95% confidence level or in other words
reject Ho. This means that there is at least one significant parameter.
Based on the results of
the optimization of the model parameters, it is found that parameter 5 is
positive with an Odd Ratio = 1.08 and p = 0.860. This finding means that if
other variables remain constant, then children living in noncoastal areas have
an increased risk of diarrhea by 1.08 times compared to toddlers living in
coastal areas. Statistically, the probability of this decrease was not
significantly different at the 5% significance level, as shown by p=0.860
(86.0% > 5%). Conceptually, the humidity level in the lowlands and coastal
areas becomes high due to the evaporation of water from lakes, seas, and swamps
due to high air temperatures. These conditions can be optimal for the growth of
vectors and pathogenic microorganisms that cause infection. Environmental
hygiene in higher temperatures must be carried out more often than in areas
with lower temperatures. The development of vectors carrying diarrheal germs,
such as flies, includes survival. Pre-adult development occurs at an optimum
temperature of 28�C so that at temperatures less than 16�C, the development of
vectors carrying diarrheal germs, such as flies, will stop (Ihsan, 2016).
The results of the
optimization of model parameters for clean water sources show that the
parameter 6 is positive, while the parameters 7, 8, 9, 10 are negative with an
odd ratio and the value of [p=] is 5.83 [0.402], 0.51 [0.385], 0.84 [0.813],
0.01 [0.000] and 0.02 [0.000]. If the other variables remain the same, toddlers
whose families use clean water for daily activities from the mountains will
decrease compared to toddlers whose families use clean water from ground wells.
In contrast, the susceptibility to diarrhea will decrease when households use
clean water sources from ring wells, cement wells, drilled wells, and PDAMs
than toddlers whose families use clean water sourced from ground wells. This
decrease was significantly different at the 5% level for clean water sourced
from drilled wells and PDAMs aimed at p-values of 0.000 and 0.000 (0.1 and 0.2
<5%), respectively.
Conceptually, diarrhea is
an environmental-based disease commonly referred to as a water-borne disease.
Water sources have a role in the spread of several infectious diseases.
However, in this study, clean water sources were not associated with the
incidence of diarrhea. This is in line with the research conducted by (Fatmawati et al., 2017) on 59
children under five in Kenali Asam Bawah Village, which showed no relationship
between the use of clean water and the incidence of diarrhea with a p-value =
0.907. The Source of clean water is one of the sanitation facilities that are
no less important and related to the incidence of diarrhea. Some infectious
germs that cause diarrhea are transmitted through the faecal-oral route. They
can be transmitted by putting in the mouth, fingers, liquids, or objects
contaminated with faeces and food prepared in pots washed with contaminated
water.
Research conducted (Terang & Nur, 2017), which
examined the provision of clean water sources in areas close to the sea, found that
the poor used brackish water for their MCK needs because fresh and clean water
could only be obtained if they drilled to a depth of 100 meters�constrained by
very high costs.
Optimizing model
parameters for drinking water sources shows that parameter 11 is negative. In
contrast, the parameter 12 is positive with an odd ratio, and the [p=] values
are 0.02 [0.04], 1.19 [0.704]. If the other variables remain the same, in
toddlers whose families use drinking water from mountain springs, the chance of
susceptibility to diarrhea will decrease to 0.02 times that of toddlers whose
families consume well water. This decrease was significantly different at the
5% level as seen from the p-value = 0.004 < 5%. While the parameter 12 is
positive with Odd Ratio = 1.19 and p-value = 0.704. If the other variables
remain the same, in toddlers whose families use drinking water sourced from
bottles/gallons, the chance of susceptibility to diarrhea will increase to 1.19
times that of toddlers whose families use well water. Statistically, the
increase in probability was not significantly different at the 5% significance
level, as shown by p=0.704 (70.4% >5%).
Conceptually, drinking
water must be safe and meet various health requirements. Good drinking water
must meet physical, bacteriological, and chemical requirements. The physical
requirements for healthy drinking water are colourless, tasteless, and
odourless. The temperature is below the ambient temperature. Bacteriologically,
healthy drinking water must be free from all bacteria, especially bacteria that
are pathogenic and harmful to the drinker. Healthy drinking water must contain
certain substances in specific appropriate amounts. Water that can be said to
be clean has acidity or PH 7, and the amount of saturated dissolved oxygen is
nine mg/l (RI, 2018).
Based on the optimization
of model parameters for latrine ownership, it is found that parameter 13 is
negative with Odd Ratio = 0.04 and p-value = 0.000. This means that if other
variables remain the same, in toddlers whose families have latrines, the chance
of susceptibility to diarrhea will decrease to 0.04 compared to toddlers who do
not. The decrease was significantly different at the 5% significance level, as
shown by p (0.04% < 5%).
Conceptually, latrine
ownership is vital in everyday life. This research was conducted in the South
Lampung Regency, where South Lampung Regency has received a certificate as a
Regency that has implemented Open Defecation Free (ODF) or Stops Open
Defecation by the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia in 2019. This
certificate is conditional because there are still households in some areas.
South Lampung District does not yet have a latrine, so it is the homework of
the Lampung Satan District Government to continue trying to complete its
development target so that the certificate is not conditional. South Lampung
Regency became the second-best district out of 29 regencies/cities in Indonesia
that won the STBM (Community-Based Total Sanitation) Sustainable Award 2020 by
the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia. This is a form of hard
work carried out by the South Lampung Regency Government in completing the
construction of latrines for households in the South Lampung Regency and is
still carrying out construction. There are still households in South Lampung
that do not have a latrine. Family latrines are owned by the family and used by
all family members to dispose of human faeces or faeces. Stool or faeces is an
object that endangers health because it is a source of transmission of various
diseases (Fauziah & Tina, 2016).
This study is in line
with research conducted by (Anjar et al., 2020); there is a
relationship between the availability of family latrines with the incidence of
diarrhea in toddlers; latrines are very useful for humans and are part of human
life because latrines can prevent the proliferation of diseases caused by indiscriminate
human waste can contaminate water, soil, or become a source of infection, for
health.
The optimization of the
model parameters results shows that parameter 14 is negative with an Odd Ratio
of 0.25 with a p-value of 0.010. Suppose other variables remain the same in
toddlers whose families have septicemia. In that case, the chance of
susceptibility to diarrhea will decrease to 0.25 times that of toddlers whose
families do not. The decrease in probability was significantly different at the
5% significance level, as shown by P=0.010 (1.0% < 5%).
The optimization of the
model parameters results shows that parameter 15 is negative with an Odd Ratio
of 0.40 with a p-value of 0.126. This means that if other variables remain the
same, toddlers whose families have drainage (SPAL) will decrease the chance of
susceptibility to diarrhea to 0.40 times that of toddlers whose families do not
have SPAL according to health standards. Statistically, the decrease in
probability was not significantly different at the 5% significance level, as
shown by p=0.126 (12.6% >5%).
Based on the results of
the optimization of the model parameters, it is found that the SPAL
construction parameters 16 and 17 are positive with odds ratio and [p=] 1.75
[0.638], 3.52 [0.295], respectively. Suppose the other variables remain the
same in toddlers with SPAL construction made of cement or PVC. In that case,
susceptibility to diarrhea will increase to 1.75 and 3.52 times that of
toddlers whose families have SPALs made of soil or grass. The increase in
probability was not significantly different at the 5% significance level, as
shown by p=0.638 and 0.295 (63.8% and 29.5 > 5%).
Conceptually, in
principle, handling and safeguarding household liquid waste must be
appropriately managed so as not to cause disease breeding grounds; from this,
it can be done to handle wastewater with the following criteria: Waste water
from bathrooms and kitchens should not be mixed with water from latrines, must
not cause odours, must not have puddles of water that cause slippery floors and
are prone to accidents, connected to public sewers/sewers or infiltration wells
(Sengkey et al., 2020).
Based on the results of
the optimization of the model parameters, it was found that parameters 18 and
19 were negative with the odds ratio and [p=] 0.09 [0.057] and 0.02 [0.001],
respectively. This means that if the other variables remain the same, toddlers
who have waste management incinerated or transported by garbage janitors, the
vulnerability of the chance of getting diarrhea decreases to 0.09 and 0.02
times than toddlers who manage their waste arbitrarily. Statistically, the
decrease in probability was significantly different at the 5% significance
level, as shown by p=0.057 and 0.001 (5.7% and 0.01 > 5%).
This study is in line
with previous research, which stated that there was a relationship between
waste management and the incidence of diarrhea. According to research conducted
by (Susanti, 2018) in the Deli
river basin, Medan City, it shows that for waste processing variables, from 6
respondents who are not available for waste disposal, having toddlers suffer
from diarrhea proportion of 100% and 89 respondents there less waste disposal.
Those who suffer from diarrhea have a proportion of 13.5% compared to those who
do not suffer from diarrhea, 86.5%. The results of the study were proven by
statistical tests with a value of 0.000 < 0.05, meaning there is a
relationship between waste disposal and diarrheal disease. In this study,
residents who live in the coastal area of South Lampung Regency, one of which
is Rajabasa District, still litter; some throw it in the river or directly into
the sea. The garbage truck from the district has not yet reached Rajabasa
District, South Lampung Regency. So the choice of
residents only burn garbage or throw it carelessly. To process waste into
compost or so, the residents of Rajabasa District have never done this.
Based on the optimization
of the model parameters, it is found that parameter 20 is positive with an Odd
Ratio = 1.40 with p-value = 0.631. If the other variables remain the same, a
toddler whose family has a tile/cement floor is more susceptible to diarrhea
than 1.40 times that of a toddler whose family has a floor made of earth. The
increase in probability was not significantly different at the 5% level as
shown by p = 0.631 (63.1% > 5%).
The optimization results
of the model parameters are that parameter 21 is negative with Odd Ratio = 0.10
with p-value = 0.000. This means that if the other variables remain the same, a
toddler whose family has a floor made of ceramic has a chance of susceptibility
to diarrhea to 0.10 times that of a toddler whose family has a floor made of
earth. The decrease in probability was significantly different at the 5% level
as shown by p = 0.000 (= 0.04% < 5%).
Conceptually, according
to (Subarkah & Samino, 2014), the type of
floor that fulfils a healthy house's requirements is clean, not dusty, and not
flooded in the rainy season. Based on the results of this study, it is known
that there are still people who own houses of this type (soil, wood/bamboo).
The existence of a community or family that has a ground floor that is not
waterproof can allow the floor to cause diarrhea in toddlers. The floor that is
not waterproof is the floor of the house that is still made of soil, and the
type of floor that is waterproof is the type of floor made of ceramic.
Activities carried out by toddlers playing on the floor of the house can cause
contact with the toddler's body, and this situation gives rise to various germs
that stick to the toddler's body. This can cause diarrhea in toddlers.
6. Goodness Of Fit Test Results
The model suitability test or Goodness-of-Fit was conducted to assess
the suitability of the binary logistic regression model with the data. The
suitability test of the model with the data can be seen in Table 15. As
follows:
Table 15. Goodness-of-Fit
Tests
|
Method |
Chi-Square |
DF |
P |
|
Hosmer-Lemeshow |
18,229 |
8 |
0.020 |
Based on Table 6, the P value at
Hosmer-Lemeshow was 0.020, indicating more than = 0.05. The binary logistic
regression model fits/matches the observation data. This assessment means that
if there is a toddler/newborn baby, then the chances of the toddler developing
diarrhea can be predicted with the following model:
|
|
0-2.40537[NTRL_ST]i+0.0543822 [AGE_INF]-0.905724[GEND_BABY]i -2.26223[ASI]i-0.257573[AREA]i+1.76321 [D3_MOUNT]i+0,124611
[D3_RINGS]i +1.07434[D3_CMNT]i-6,21342
[D3_BOR]i-3,56354[D3_PDAM]i-2,56494 [D4_WTR_MOUNT]i+0.917512[D4_GLLN]i -3,31955[WC]i-0,535174[SPTICTNK]i-1,49946[SPAL]i+0,153806 [D5_SPAL_CMNT]i+0.622821[D5_SPAL_PVC]i-2,33641[WST_FIRE]i-4,86838
[WST_MNGED]i+1.85822 [FLR_CMNT]i -2.57936 [FLR_KRMK]i+ξi |
Researchers have made maximum efforts in
the data collection to obtain valid and universal results. However, this study
still has limitations; namely, the selection of children under five in each
region is not done individually but in general. Because it does not measure
meters above sea level (mdpl) per location of the toddler's house, the selected
MDPL may represent the coastal area the same as the noncoastal area. The limitations of this study can be used as a
reference for improvement in future research.
CONCLUSION
Based on the results of research and
discussion on the Analysis of the Effect of Variables of Nutritional Status and
Environmental Sanitation on the Incidence of Toddler Diarrhea, a Comparative
Study of Coastal Areas and Noncoastal Areas of South Lampung Regency can be
concluded as follows: This study shows that the influence of variables on
nutritional status and environmental sanitation has a significant probability
Of suppressing the incidence of diarrhea in toddlers, there are variables in
the nutritional status group of toddlers, including poor/poor nutritional
status, age of toddlers and history of exclusive breastfeeding. The group of
environmental sanitation variables includes clean water sources from BOR wells,
clean water sources from PDAM, latrine facilities, septic tanks, managed waste
management, tile/cement house floors, and ceramic house floors. There is no
significant relationship between coastal and noncoastal areas on the incidence
of diarrhea in children under five. This study produces a model that can
predict the incidence of diarrhea in toddlers to reduce the incidence of
diarrhea in toddlers.
REFERENCES
(UNICEF), U. N. C. F. (2021). Diarrhoea. https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-health/diarrhoeal-disease/
(WHO), W. H. O. (2020). Diarrhoea.
https://www.who.int/health-topics/diarrhoea#tab=tab_1
Anjar, S., Khairun, N. B., & Hari, K. (2020). Development
of Prediction Model for Childhood Diarrhea Based on Maternal Care Variables,
Characteristics of Children, Demography and Sanitation in Study Environment
Tulang Bawang Barat Regency. International Journal of Progressive Sciences
and Technologies, 23(2).
BLUM, H. L., & KNOLLMUELLER, R. N. (1975). Planning
for health; development and application of social change theory (Vol. 75,
Issue 8). LWW.
Bolon, C. M. T. (2021). Gastroenteritis pada Balita dan
Peran Pola Asuh Orang Tua. Yayasan Kita Menulis.
Demissie, G. D., Yeshaw, Y., Aleminew, W., & Akalu, Y.
(2021). Diarrhea and associated factors among under five children in
sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from demographic and health surveys of 34
sub-Saharan countries. Plos One, 16(9), e0257522.
Dharmayanti, I., & Tjandrarini, D. H. (2020). Peran
lingkungan dan individu terhadap masalah diare di pulau jawa dan bali. Jurnal
Ekologi Kesehatan, 19(2), 84�93.
Fatmawati, T. Y., Indrawati, I. I., & Ariyanto, A. A.
(2017). Analisis Penggunaan Air Bersih, Mencuci Tangan, Membuang Tinja Dengan
Kejadian Diare Pada Balita. Jurnal Endurance: Kajian Ilmiah Problema
Kesehatan, 2(3), 294�302.
Fauziah, A., & Tina, L. (2016). Studi Komparatif
Determinan Kejadian Diare Di Wilayah Pesisir (Puskesmas Abeli) Dan Perkotaan
(Puskesmas Lepo-lepo) Tahun 2016. Haluoleo University.
Gali, A., Krishna, K., Lowry, J., & Mohammadnezhad, M.
(2020). Environmental factors associated with diarrhoea prevalence among
under-five children in the Mataniko settlements in Honiara, Solomon Islands. Rural
and Remote Health, 20(1).
Ganguly, E., Sharma, P. K., & Bunker, C. H. (2015).
Prevalence and risk factors of diarrhea morbidity among under-five children in
India: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian Journal of Child Health,
2(4), 152.
Getachew, A., Tadie, A., G Hiwot, M., Guadu, T., Haile, D., G
Cherkos, T., Gizaw, Z., & Alemayehu, M. (2018). Environmental factors of
diarrhea prevalence among under five children in rural area of North Gondar
zone, Ethiopia. Italian Journal of Pediatrics, 44(1), 1�7.
Gultom, R. (2021). Evaluasi Kepatuhan Pasien Anak Penderita
Diare terhadap Penggunaan Antibiotik di Rumah Sakit Umum (RSU) Karya Bakti
Ujung Bandar Rantauprapat. JIFI (Jurnal Ilmiah Farmasi Imelda), 4(2),
37�42.
Hidayat, A. A. (2015). Metode penelitian kesehatan
paradigma kuantitatif. Health Books Publishing.
Hosmer Jr, D. W., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X.
(2013). Applied logistic regression (Vol. 398). John Wiley & Sons.
Ihsan, I. M. (2016). Pengaruh suhu udara terhadap
perkembangan pradewasa lalat rumah (Musca domestica). Jurnal Teknologi
Lingkungan, 17(2), 100�107.
Ishud, N. K., & Romadona, N. F. (2020). A Review of The
Effect of Nutritional Status on Gross Motor Skills of Early Childhood. International
Conference on Elementary Education, 2(1), 664�674.
Kemenkes, R. I. (2014). Profil kesehatan indonesia. Jakarta:
Kementrian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia.
Maarif, M. Z., & Nafies, D. A. A. (2021). HUBUNGAN
KEJADIAN DIARE DENGAN STATUS GIZI BALITA DI KELURAHAN SIDOREJO KECAMATAN
KABUPATEN TUBAN. Jurnal Gizi Aisyah, 4(2), 35�41.
Marimbi, H. (2010). Tumbuh kembang, status gizi dan imunisasi
dasar pada balita. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika, 42.
Nemeth V, P. N. D. (2022). Diarrhea. StatPearls
Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK448082/
Palancoi, N. A. (2014). Hubungan antara pengetahuan dan
lingkungan dengan kejadian diare akut pada anak di Kelurahan Pabbundukang
Kecamatan Pangkajene Kabupaten Pangkep. Jurnal Kesehatan, 7(2).
Prawati, D. D. (2019). Faktor yang mempengaruhi kejadian
diare di Tambak Sari Kota Surabaya. Jurnal Promkes: The Indonesian Journal
of Health Promotion and Health Education, 7(1), 34�45.
Rahmawati, A. (2019). Pemberian Asi Eksklusif dan Status Gizi
Serta Hubunganya terhadap Kejadian Diare Pada Balita di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas
Juntinyuat. Gema Wiralodra, 10(1), 105�114.
RI, K. (2011). Panduan Sosialisasi Tatalaksana Diare Balita
(Direktorat). Jakarta: Direktorat Jendral Pengendalian Penyakit Dan
Penyehatan Lingkungan.
RI, K. (2018). Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia.
Kementerian Kesehatan RI. Sekretariat r Jenderal. Rencana Strategis Kementerian
Kesehatan Tahun Rencana Strategis Kementerian Kesehatan Tahun.
Saputri, D. E., Bakri, S., & Zuraida, R. (2015). Peranan
sistem repong damar terhadap pendapatan, asupan makan dan status gizi balita:
studi kasus di Desa Pahmungan Kecamatan Pesisir Tengah Kabupaten Pesisir Barat.
Jurnal Sylva Lestari, 3(1), 63�70.
Sengkey, A., Joseph, W. B. S., & Warouw, F. (2020).
Hubungan Antara Ketersediaan Jamban Keluarga Dan Sistem Pembuangan Air Limbah
Rumah Tangga Dengan Kejadian Diare Pada Balita Usia 24-59 Bulan Di Desa Raanan
Baru Kecamatan Motoling Barat Kabupaten Minahasa Selatan. KESMAS, 9(1).
Septikasari, M. (2018). Status gizi anak dan faktor yang
mempengaruhi. Uny Press.
Subarkah, M. I., & Samino, S. (2014). Faktor-Faktor
Sanitasi Lingkungan Yang Berhubungan Dengan Kejadian Diare Pada Balita
Diwilayah Kerja Puskesmas Bukit Kemuning Lampung. Jurnal Dunia Kesmas, 3(3).
Susanti, E. (2018). Hubungan Perilaku Sehat Ibu Dan
Lingkungan Sanitasi Dasar Dengan Kejadian Diare Pada Balita Di Daerah Aliran
Sungai Deli Kota Medan Tahun 2018.
Terang, U., & Nur, T. Bin. (2017). Ibm Penyediaan Sumber
Air Bersih Untuk Kebutuhan Rumah Tangga Masyarakat Kurang Mampu Di Dusun Ii
Desa Bagan Kuala Kecamatan Tanjung Beringin Kabupaten Serdang Bedagai. Abdimas
Talenta: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 2(2), 148�153.
Unicef. (2020). Situasi anak di indonesia-tren, peluang, dan
tantangan dalam memenuhi hak-hak anak. Jakarta: UNICEF Indonesia.
Wasihun, A. G., Dejene, T. A., Teferi, M., Marug�n, J.,
Negash, L., Yemane, D., & McGuigan, K. G. (2018). Risk factors for
diarrhoea and malnutrition among children under the age of 5 years in the
Tigray Region of Northern Ethiopia. PloS One, 13(11), e0207743.
Widaryanti, R. (2019). Pemberian Makan Bayi dan Anak.
Deepublish.
Zuraida, R., Wardani, D. W. S. R., Susianti, S., &
Novianty, D. (2022). Peningkatan Peran Ibu-Ibu PKK dan Kader Puskesmas Tanjung
Sari Tentang ASI Eksklusif Sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Perilaku Pemberian ASI
Eksklusif. JPM (Jurnal Pengabdian Masyakat) Ruwa Jurai, 6(1),
55�58.
|
|
|