LEGAL UNCERTAINTY FOR
POLICE MEMBERS IN THE LIMITS OF POSITIONS OUTSIDE THE POLICE
Anwar
Sunarjo1, Riswadi2
Universitas
Borobudur, Indonesia
[email protected], [email protected]
ABSTRACT
This research
examines the legal uncertainties surrounding restrictions on police officers holding
positions outside the police institution, focusing on the analysis of Law
Number 2 of 2002 concerning the Indonesian National Police. Using a normative
legal research method with legislative and conceptual approaches, the study
reviews relevant legal provisions and principles of legal certainty and
separation of powers. Key findings reveal significant regulatory ambiguities in
defining permissible external roles, enforcement mechanisms, and conditions
under which police officers may hold such positions. These gaps contribute to
overlapping authorities, legal inconsistencies, and potential conflicts of
interest. The study concludes by recommending specific policy revisions,
including clarifying legal provisions, strengthening oversight mechanisms, and
establishing clear criteria for permissible external roles. These measures aim
to enhance legal certainty, maintain institutional integrity, and foster
greater public trust in law enforcement.
Keywords: legal uncertainty, police
officers, positions
Corresponding Author: Anwar Sunarjo
E-mail: [email protected]
INTRODUCTION
Legal certainty is a fundamental pillar in law
enforcement, especially in the police profession, which functions as the
vanguard in maintaining public security and order
Moreover, the police play a crucial role in
fostering a sense of security among citizens by providing effective protection
services
The primary responsibility of police officers is
to enforce the law, ensure public safety, and protect citizens from various
threats, whether internal or external
In carrying out their duties, police officers must
adhere to professional, ethical standards and uphold the principle of legality
to prevent the misuse of authority. Police actions that are not based on the
law or that violate the rights of the community will harm the reputation of the
police institution and reduce its effectiveness in protecting the public.
Therefore, this obligation is an integral part of efforts to build public
trust, which is crucial for the success of law enforcement in a country.
In Indonesia, as a rule-of-law country that
prioritizes principles of democracy and popular sovereignty, the separation of
powers is a mandatory requirement enshrined in the constitution. This
separation of powers is essential to ensure that each institution has limited
authority and does not overlap, ultimately maintaining balance and preventing
the abuse of power
One form of authority limitation within the
Indonesian constitutional system is the provision that restricts members of the
Indonesian National Police (Polri) from holding positions outside the police
institution unless they have received permission or a special assignment from
the Chief of Police. This rule is outlined in Article 28, paragraph (3) of Law
Number 2 of 2002 concerning the Indonesian National Police. The article's
explanation defines positions outside the police as those not directly related
to police duties or not assigned officially by the Chief of Police. However, in
practice, there have been instances where active police members occupy roles
outside their institution, including various government agencies and national
bodies. For example, Polri members have been assigned to significant positions
such as the National Counterterrorism Agency, the National Narcotics Agency,
and even as Indonesian Ambassadors in multiple countries. While some of these
assignments may aim to leverage the technical expertise of police members, they
can legally create uncertainty and raise concerns regarding the principle of
police neutrality
This legal certainty is becoming increasingly
important in order to maintain the independence and objectivity of the police
institution. When police officers hold public positions outside of the police
function, there is a risk of overlapping authority and potential conflicts of
interest that can disrupt the performance and neutrality of the institution. Suppose
a police officer is actively involved in policy-making or carrying out
executive duties outside the scope of the police. In that case, the possibility
of mismanagement and decisions that are not in line with their main jobs can
increase
Legal certainty serves as the foundation of
effective law enforcement, ensuring that police officers operate within clearly
defined legal boundaries. However, ambiguities in legal frameworks can hinder
law enforcement agencies from performing their duties effectively. One critical
issue concerns the appointment of police officers to positions outside the
police institution, as regulated by Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning the
Indonesian National Police. Article 28, paragraph (3) of the law prohibits
police officers from holding external positions unless formally assigned by the
Chief of Police. Despite this provision, the lack of specific guidelines
regarding permissible roles, criteria for appointments, and oversight
mechanisms has led to inconsistent enforcement, legal uncertainty, and
potential conflicts of interest.
This regulatory vagueness has resulted in
various interpretations among legal practitioners and government officials. In
practice, police officers have been appointed to strategic roles in other
government agencies, such as the National Counter-Terrorism Agency (BNPT), or
as Indonesian ambassadors, raising concerns about overlapping authority and the
erosion of police neutrality. While such assignments may leverage police
expertise in security and law enforcement, the absence of a clear legal
framework creates risks of misuse of authority, blurred institutional roles,
and diminished public trust in law enforcement agencies.
Given these challenges, this study examines the
legal uncertainties surrounding police appointments outside the institution by
identifying regulatory gaps, analyzing their implications for law enforcement
integrity, and proposing legal reforms. It highlights the need for more precise
definitions, strengthened oversight mechanisms, and legislative amendments to
ensure the neutrality and professionalism of police officers. Addressing these
issues through a more transparent legal framework will enhance public trust and
institutional accountability in Indonesia's law enforcement system.
METHOD
The normative legal research method is an analytical
approach that examines law from a regulatory or normative perspective. Its
primary focus is on essential legal materials, including rules, regulations,
and various legal documents, to comprehend, study, or interpret applicable
provisions. In this study, the legislative approach is a key component,
involving an examination of pertinent written rules to explain or analyze the
legal issues at hand. This method enables researchers to assess the alignment between
laws and actual practices, as well as to identify potential legal ambiguities.
Additionally, the conceptual approach is employed to delve deeper into legal
concepts such as the principles of legal certainty, justice, and the separation
of powers. This exploration helps researchers grasp the fundamental essence of
existing rules and their application within the relevant legal context. The
conceptual approach includes an investigation of relevant legal theories and
doctrines, which can clarify and reinforce normative legal analysis, especially
when developing arguments or solutions grounded in a theoretical understanding
of the legal challenges being addressed.
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
Legal Uncertainty in the
Limits of Police Member Positions Outside the Police
The tasks of the police regulated in the Police
Law include maintaining public security and order, law enforcement, and roles
to protect, serve, and provide assistance to the community. From this primary
responsibility, operational police tasks are divided into several aspects,
including monitoring and controlling citizen and government activities,
providing security escorts and protection, and traffic regulation to maintain
order and smooth activities in the community. Additionally, the police also
play a role in educating the public to enhance legal awareness and compliance
with existing regulations. This responsibility also includes maintaining public
stability and social order and involves the police's role in internal oversight
within the authorities to prevent unlawful acts.
The police also must conduct investigations and
inquiries into criminal acts based on the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) and
other regulations. This task is expanded with identification functions in
investigations, police psychology, and the management of forensic laboratories
to support the investigative process. Furthermore, the police provide security
protection to citizens and actively offer assistance and support in
emergencies. Additionally, the police play a role in meeting public security
needs within specific time frames, collaborating with relevant officials and
agencies. This also includes services to communities needing police support
following their primary duties and executing instructions or additional tasks
based on existing regulations.
In carrying out these tasks, the Police Law
provides extensive authority, such as receiving reports and complaints from the
public, mediating disputes that threaten public security, and addressing
potential disturbances that could jeopardize national unity. The police are
also granted the right to create administrative regulations concerning police
affairs and carry out preventive checks. Moreover, the police have the
authority to take initial action at crime scenes (TKP), identify witnesses or
suspects, and gather necessary evidence or statements for legal processes. This
task includes maintaining security at trial locations, executing court
decisions, managing seized items for a specific period, and ensuring that
police functions in law and order can operate optimally.
Within the scope of criminal law, police
authority is further expanded, including the right to detain, arrest, search,
and seize evidence. The police can also restrict access to crime scenes to
maintain the integrity of investigations, identify and examine suspects, and
conduct document checks. Additionally, the police have the authority to summon
witnesses or suspects for questioning, call experts to assist in
investigations, and halt investigations if valid reasons are found. In this
aspect of duties and authority, the term "related to the police"
mentioned in Article 28, paragraph (3) of the Police Law becomes very
important. The definition of these duties and authorities provides clear
parameters to evaluate whether positions or roles outside the police held by
police members meet the valid criteria of connection or comply with the
institutional mandate regulated by law.
Article 28, paragraph (3) of the Police Law
states that police members are only allowed to hold other positions outside the
police after retirement or resigning from police duties. The explanation of
this article emphasizes that positions outside the police must not be related
to the functions and responsibilities of an active police member and must
receive approval from the Chief of the Indonesian National Police (Kapolri). If
the position is not directly related to police functions, then the appointment
violates legal provisions. Positions that align with police functions include
the Head of the National Narcotics Agency or the Head of the National Disaster
Management Agency, which are closely related to security and law enforcement.
Conversely, a position like Acting Governor (Plt.) needs to be aligned with
police duties and functions, making it inappropriate for a police member to
fill that position. However, the position of the Chair of the Corruption
Eradication Commission (KPK) is considered more relevant because it often
involves the role of the police in investigations.
Other opinions suggest that any police member
wishing to occupy a position outside the police should first resign or retire, primarily
if the position is not related to police functions. This means that positions
unrelated to police functions, such as Acting Governor, require resignation
from active service for the appointment to be considered valid and legal.
According to this view, the position of the Chair of the KPK, which frequently
involves police members in investigative teams, is still deemed relevant for an
active police officer, provided there is permission from Kapolri. In this case,
the legality of the appointment would become an issue if the occupied position
is not in accordance with police functions and does not have official
permission from Kapolri. Another opinion states that Article 28, paragraph (3)
restricts police members from holding positions outside the police that do not
have a direct connection to police duties and are not based on orders from
Kapolri. For the position of Acting Governor, which is considered unrelated to
police functions, the appointment of a police member to this position is deemed
a violation of Article 28, paragraph (3). However, the Chair of the KPK
position is viewed as an exception since police officers frequently serve as
KPK investigators, which relates to police functions. Therefore, the legality
of appointing a police member to this position is valid as long as permission
is obtained from Kapolri.
Theoretically, authority in government positions
can be obtained through attribution, delegation, or mandate. Attribution refers
to the grant of authority by law to a government organ; delegation involves the
transfer of authority from one organ to another, while mandate occurs when one
government organ allows its jurisdiction to be exercised by another organ on
its behalf. Regional heads in local government possess authority that includes
attribution, delegation, and mandate under the prevailing regulations. In
carrying out duties as a regional head or Acting (Plt.), the authority held
tends to be limited. For example, in Government Regulation No. 49 of 2008
Article 132A, paragraph (1), the Acting Governor cannot transfer employees,
revoke licenses from previous officials, issue permits that contradict previous
policies, or create policies that conflict with prior government policies. This
indicates that the authority of the Acting Governor is restricted in various
matters that may intersect with police duties.
As long as someone holds a position granted
through an official appointment process, they have the right to take action
related to that position by prevailing legal regulations. An example of this
application can be seen from the actions of the newly appointed Acting Governor
of West Java, who immediately exercised his authority in discussing local
political agendas and issued regulations such as Governor Regulation (Pergub)
No. 54 of 2018 regarding the mechanism for determining the Minimum Wage in West
Java. A legal expert's theory states that authority is the right granted by law
to produce legal consequences. However, in the context of the law governing the
police, there are no provisions that explicitly grant police members the
authority to hold positions as Acting Governors or other roles outside of
police duties, which raises doubts about the legal status of such appointments.
In discussions regarding the legality of
positions outside of the police, several constitutional law experts assert that
appointing police members to specific positions outside the police is only
lawful if the positions align with the functions and roles of the police, such
as the leadership of the National Disaster Management Agency or the Corruption
Eradication Commission. However, for positions like Acting Governor, as long as
the court has not annulled the appointment decision, the execution of the duties
carried out is considered legally valid. As long as the official appointment
letter is still in force, the legal actions taken by the official will be
recognized. Yet, due to the Acting Governor position not being related to
police functions, there is uncertainty regarding the appropriateness of the
role with legal provisions.
Other legal perspectives highlight this issue
from a different angle, emphasizing that the appointment of police members to
positions outside the police that do not relate to their functions is an
illegal act. Appointments lacking a firm legal basis or violating regulations
are deemed to result in formal defects, meaning that the actions of such
officials need to meet the formal requirements stipulated. This legal
uncertainty leads to any legal actions taken by the official in a position that
does not comply with the law being regarded as a formal defect. Based on
normative reviews and various expert opinions, the appointment of police
members to positions that are not directly related to police duties and
functions causes legal uncertainty. This uncertainty arises because such
decisions need a solid foundation in legal regulations, potentially leading to
various legal issues. Any legal action taken by officials in positions
appointed contrary to the law risks being considered a formal defect, leading
to legal uncertainty that could impact the stability and accountability of the
governance system.
Efforts Can Be Made to
Harmonize Legal Regulations Regarding Position Restrictions for Police Members
Outside the Police Institution
The limitation on the positions held by police members
outside their institution is a critical issue that demands serious attention,
particularly in the context of law enforcement and the preservation of the
police's integrity. Law Number 2 of 2002 regarding the Indonesian National
Police explicitly outlines the authorities and restrictions placed on police
members in their duties, including roles outside the police force. However, the
legal ambiguities surrounding these position restrictions can lead to potential
abuses of power and erode public trust in the police institution. Consequently,
strategic efforts are necessary to harmonize existing legal regulations,
ensuring they are more apparent, more consistent, and adhere to the principles
of good governance.
Law Number 2 of 2002 on the Indonesian National Police
serves as the legal foundation that regulates the functions, tasks, and
authorities of the police in Indonesia. In the context of police members’
positions, this law provides a clear explanation of the limits that police
members must follow while executing their duties. A critical article in this
law is Article 28, paragraph (3), which stipulates that active police members
are prohibited from holding positions outside the police, except under certain
conditions, such as after retirement or resignation. This aims to maintain the
integrity and independence of the police institution to prevent conflicts of
interest that could damage the image and trust of the public in law enforcement
agencies. However, despite this law having a clear framework, its
implementation in the field often faces various challenges that lead to
confusion and legal uncertainty.
Article 28, paragraph (3) of the Police Law asserts
that active police members are only allowed to hold positions outside the
police if those positions are not related to police duties and functions and
only after obtaining permission from the Kapolri (Chief of the National
Police). This provision should provide legal certainty and avoid potential
abuse of power. However, the assessment of this article reveals shortcomings in
explaining the criteria and types of positions outside the police that are considered
"unrelated." The lack of a more specific explanation regarding these
boundaries makes interpretation subjective and may vary among law enforcement
officials. Consequently, the potential for placing police members in positions
that conflict with the integrity of the police remains, underscoring the urgent
need for revision or further clarification of this article.
In practice, there are legal loopholes and
inconsistencies in existing regulations related to the restrictions on police
members’ positions. One such loophole is the ambiguity surrounding the
mechanisms for oversight and accountability in appointing police members to
positions outside the institution. Although there are provisions for permission
from the Kapolri, there are no clear guidelines or standards about how this
permission process is conducted and under what conditions appointments can be
accepted. Moreover, there are differing interpretations among law enforcement
personnel concerning certain positions, such as those in other government
agencies, which often lead to confusion in the field. This inconsistency in the
application of the law creates uncertainty for police members wishing to
transition to positions outside the police, potentially resulting in
dissatisfaction and decreasing public trust in the institution. Therefore, it
is essential to conduct a comprehensive evaluation and adjustment of existing
regulations to ensure greater harmony and support for practical law enforcement
goals.
It is critical to clarify and firmly establish the
restrictions on positions for police members to maintain the integrity and
professionalism of the institution. One practical step would be to develop
clear guidelines or technical instructions outlining the types of external
positions that active members are permitted to hold, as well as those that are
prohibited. This document should delineate specific criteria for roles unrelated
to police functions and identify those considered potentially conflict-ridden.
Furthermore, a transparent and accountable evaluation mechanism should be
established to assess each request from police members wishing to take
positions outside the institution. By doing so, we can create consistent and
easily understood standards, thereby preventing varying interpretations among
law enforcement officials. Furthermore, training and socialization for police
members regarding these position restrictions are also essential to ensure they
understand the legal implications of appointments outside the institution.
To accommodate practical needs in managing police
members’ positions, amendments to Law Number 2 of 2002 on the Police should be
considered. Proposed amendments could include adding specific articles
regarding the types of positions that active members are allowed and not
allowed to hold. For example, the law could establish particular categories of
positions, such as those in government agencies, that active police members
must avoid. Additionally, the article regulating the permission application
process needs clarification, including assessment criteria, processing time,
and the parties responsible for reviewing and granting permission. This will
help ensure that the appointment of police members to positions outside the
institution meets legal requirements and aligns with principles of justice and
transparency. By carrying out comprehensive revisions, it is hoped that these
policies can create a more transparent legal environment that supports the
police’s duties in protecting the community as well as maintaining security and
order.
CONCLUSION
Legal uncertainty regarding restrictions on
police officers holding positions outside the police institution presents
significant challenges, including potential abuses of power, conflicts of
interest, and diminished public trust in law enforcement. While Law Number 2 of
2002 concerning the Indonesian National Police provides a foundational legal
framework, gaps and inconsistencies still need to be addressed, leading to
varying interpretations and implementation issues.
Specific policy recommendations are proposed to
address these challenges. First, legislators should amend the law by clearly
defining which external positions police officers may hold, ensuring alignment
with police functions and duties. Second, a transparent oversight mechanism
should be established to regulate appointment processes, involving a
multi-stakeholder review panel to reduce political interference. Third, the
implementation of strict monitoring and reporting procedures is essential to
ensure compliance with legal provisions and to manage cases of misconduct
effectively.
Additionally, capacity-building programs should
be developed to enhance police officers' understanding of legal boundaries and
ethical responsibilities when engaging in external roles. Public participation
mechanisms should also be strengthened, enabling citizens to voice concerns or
report potential violations. These measures are expected to enhance
institutional transparency, reinforce police neutrality, and build public
confidence in law enforcement. Ultimately, these steps will contribute to a
more accountable and legally sound police institution that operates with
integrity and fairness.
REFERENCES
Al Izzati, R., Dartanto, T.,
Suryadarma, D., & Suryahadi, A. (2024). Direct elections and trust in
state and political institutions: Evidence from Indonesia’s election reform. European
Journal of Political Economy, 85.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2024.102572
Asshiddiqie, J. (2020). Omnibus law
dan penerapannya di Indonesia. (No Title).
Biroli, A. (2015). The Problems of
Law Enforcement in Indonesia (Study with a Sociology of Law Perspective. Journal
of Dimensions, 8(2).
Endarto, B., Indriastuty, D. E.,
& Mardiana, F. (2025). Legal transplantation of blue bond regulation in
Indonesia. Environmental Development, 53.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2024.101118
Ferdik, F. (2023). Citizen
satisfaction with the police and college-based informal social controls: An
unexpected finding. Journal of Criminal Justice, 87.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2023.102088
Ferdik, F., Frogge, G., &
Cooney, M. (2022). Exploring further determinants of citizen satisfaction with
the police: The role of strain. Journal of Criminal Justice, 81.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2022.101931
Gaffar, S., Karsona, A. M.,
Pujiwati, Y., & Perwira, I. (2021). The concept of procedural law
regarding the implementation of collective agreements with legal certainty in
termination of employment in Indonesia. Heliyon, 7(4).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06690
Hadi, S. P., Hamdani, R. S., &
Roziqin, A. (2023). A sustainability review on the Indonesian job creation
law. Heliyon, 9(2).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13431
Kim, S., Han, S., & Maskály, J.
(2021). Factors of fear of crime among Korean citizens: The mediating effect
of confidence in the police. International Journal of Law, Crime and
Justice, 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2021.100488
Kusumawati, H. I., Sutono, Alim,
S., Achmad, B. F., & Putri, A. F. (2023). Factors associated with
willingness to perform basic life support in the community setting in
Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Australasian Emergency Care, 26(4),
303–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.auec.2023.03.003
Lee, H. Y., Im, H., & Kim, K.
M. (2024). Factors and age-related drivers that influence self-rated bad
health in police officers: A cross-sectional study. Preventive Medicine
Reports, 42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102748
Marotta, P. L., del Pozo, B.,
Baker, P., Abramovitz, D., Artamonova, I., Arredondo, J., McCreedy, K.,
Strathdee, S. A., Cepeda, J., & Beletsky, L. (2023). Unlocking deflection:
The role of supervisor support in police officer willingness to refer people
who inject drugs to harm reduction services. International Journal of Drug
Policy, 121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104188
Martitah, M., Sulistianingsih, D.,
Mohd Yusoff, R., & Ismail, N. (2024). Insufficient criminal justice system
response to the severity of domestic violence during the pandemic in
Indonesia. Heliyon, 10(14).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33719
Peirone, F. (2023). Another Brick
in the Building of the EU Rule of Law: Anti-Corruption. The Italian Review
of International and Comparative Law, 3(2), 515–540.
https://doi.org/10.1163/27725650-03020002
Quah, J. S. T. (2020). Combating
police corruption in Indonesia: cleansing the buaya (crocodile). Asian
Education and Development Studies, 9(2), 129–143.
https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-04-2018-0088
Rezmer, J., & Szpak, A. (2024).
Legal boundaries: Ensuring protection amidst threats to the Zaporizhzhya
Nuclear Power Plant in the Ukraine. Energy Research and Social Science,
116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103700
Sheppard, K. G., & Welsh, B. C.
(2022). Can police use of less-than-lethal weapons reduce harm during violent
police-citizen encounters? A systematic review and directions for future
research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 64.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2022.101748
Stoicescu, C., Medley, B., Wu, E.,
El-Bassel, N., Tanjung, P., & Gilbert, L. (2024). Synergistic effects of
exposure to multiple types of violence on non-fatal drug overdose among women
who inject drugs in Indonesia. International Journal of Drug Policy, 129.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104486
Suparto, S. (2021). The Position
and Function of the Regional Representative Council in Constitutional System
of Indonesia According to the Regional Autonomy Laws: A Shift from Legislative
to Regional Executive. UNIFIKASI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(1),
53–69.
Tiller, R., Booth, A. M., &
Cowan, E. (2022). Risk perception and risk realities in forming legally
binding agreements: The governance of plastics. Environmental Science and
Policy, 134, 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.04.002
Triyanti, A., Du, H., Hegger, D. L.
T., Driessen, P. P. J., van Rijswick, H. F. M. W., Scown, M., & Gilissen,
H. K. (2023). Clarifying and strengthening the role of law and governance in
climate scenario frameworks. Earth System Governance, 18.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2023.100199
Truelove, V., Stefanidis, K., &
Oviedo-Trespalacios, O. (2023). “It is a different type of policing than in
the bush”: Police officers’ perceptions of the differences in enforcement of
the phone use while driving legislation in rural and urban areas. Accident
Analysis and Prevention, 186.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2023.107046
Xu, N., Liu, J., Zhang, Z., &
Jones, S. (2024). Injury severity of police officers involved in traffic
crashes: A spatial analysis of Alabama. Safety Science, 172.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106406
Zhao, J. S., & Zhang, Y.
(2022). Proactive policing embedded in two models: A geospatial analysis of
proactive activities by patrol officers and COP officers. Journal of
Criminal Justice, 82.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2022.101972
|
|
© 2024
by the authors. It was submitted for possible open-access publication under
the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY SA) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). |