FACTORS
AFFECTING FIELD RICE PRODUCTION (ORYZA SATIVA L.) IN EAST BARITO REGENCY,
CENTRAL KALIMANTAN PROVINCE
Eti Dewi Nopembereni1,
Betrixia Barbara2, Tri Prajawahyudo3,
Fandi K.P.
Asiaka4, Pordamantra5, Tri Yuliana Eka Sintha6,
Yuprin7, Juni Amiyanto8
University of Palangka Raya, Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia
![]()
ABSTRACT
This study aims to determine the factors that
influence the production of field rice farming in Kalamus Village, Paku
District, East Barito Regency. The research location is in Kalamus
Village, Paku District, East Barito Regency. Location determination using a
purposive sampling method. The sampling technique in this study uses the
Saturated Sampling Technique, where the number of samples is equal to the total
population, namely 35 farmers. Data analysis using multiple linear regression.
The results showed that field rice farming activities were still carried out
subsistence to support food security for farmers and their families. Based on
the results of multiple linear regression analysis, partially, the factors that
significantly influence the production of upland rice are planting area, seeds,
and labor. In contrast, the
pesticide factor has no significant effect on production. Swid management has
been carried out permanently or no longer moving, and pesticides have been used
in clearing land and handling pests and diseases of Paddy Field plants. So it
can be concluded that although the results of the Multiple Regression Test show
that pesticides do not have a significant effect on the production of upland
rice, this may occur because, in general, the cultivators did not carry out
maintenance on their land, only relying on the generosity of nature. Still, now
with permanent land conditions, without burning, farmers must be able to manage
their land with technology, especially clearing land and weeds, as well as
pests and diseases using pesticides.
Keywords: field
paddy, production, subsistence, pesticides.
![]()
Corresponding Author: Betrixia Barbara
E-mail: [email protected]
INTRODUCTION
One of the agricultural sub-sectors that has an important role is the food
crop sub-sector because it is not only a source of staple food for more than
95% of Indonesia's population but also a provider of employment and a source of
income for around 21 million agricultural households. However, the rice harvested area in 2021 only reached 10.41 million
hectares, or a decrease of 2.3%, compared to 2020, when the harvested area
reached 10.66 million hectares or 245.47 thousand hectares. Paddy production in
2021 was 54.42 million tons, which also decreased by around 0.43% compared to
2020, with production reaching 54.65 million tons, or a decrease of 233.91
thousand tons (Indonesia,
2022). The decrease in rice production also impacts the decrease.
Technically, field rice, which
generally grows and develops on dry land, has its advantages compared to
lowland rice, including several varieties of dryland rice or dryland rice,
which are generally resistant to moderate (extreme)
drought (Paradise et al., 2022); (Putri et al., 2022); �(Salsadilla & Hariyono, 2022).
Central
Kalimantan Province, with an area of 153,564 km2, is the second largest area
after Papua Province. Even though it has the most significant area compared to
other provinces in Kalimantan, the fact is that Central Kalimantan is not the
province that has the largest area of harvested land and the most significant
rice production in Kalimantan (Central, 2022).
Rice
harvested area in Central Kalimantan in the last five years has decreased by
around 50.58% or around 128,800 hectares or on average has decreased by around
25,760 hectares each year, resulting in a decrease in rice production by 55.17%
or around 492,758 tons. With an average productivity level of 3.09 tons/hectare
in 2021, the data can be seen in Table 1 below:
Table 1. Harvested Area, Production, and Productivity
Rice in Central Kalimantan 2017-2021
|
Year |
Harvested area (Ha) |
Production (Tons) |
Productivity
(Tons/Ha) |
|
2017 |
254,670 |
893,202 |
3.51 |
|
2018 |
147,572 |
514,769 |
3.49 |
|
2019 |
146,145 |
443,561 |
3.04 |
|
2020 |
143,275 |
457,952 |
3,20 |
|
2021 |
125,870 |
400,444 |
3.03 |
Source: Central
Kalimantan BPS data, 2022
Based
on Central Kalimantan BPS data, East Barito Regency is the fifth largest
rice-producing district in Central Kalimantan, with an average productivity of
3 tonnes/ha. This is in
line with the data in Table 2, as follows:
Table 2. Harvested area, production, and productivity
Rice
in East Barito Regency in 2019-2021
|
Year |
Harvested area (Ha) |
Production
(Tons) |
Productivity
(Tons/Ha) |
|
2017 |
8,887 |
32,721 |
3.68 |
|
2018 |
4,226 |
14,062 |
3,33 |
|
2019 |
5,519 |
17,069 |
3.09 |
|
2020 |
5,629 |
13,760 |
2.44 |
|
2021 |
5,346 |
17.139 |
3,21 |
Source: East Barito
BPS, 2022
Based on BPS data from East Barito Regency, Paddy's
harvested area in the last five years has relatively decreased the harvested
area, around 39.84% or reaching 3,541 hectares, with an average decrease of
around 708.2 hectares each year. Paddy production also decreased by around
47.62% or reached 15,582 tons.
Based on Data from East Barito Regency in Figures, the harvested area and
production of Field Paddy decreased by around 45.58%, with an average decrease
of 351 hectares yearly. The production also decreased by around 40.92%, with an
average decrease of around 734 tonnes each year, meaning that field rice production
was one of the causes of the decline in rice production in the East Barito
Regency.
One of the subdistricts in East Barito Regency, with
relatively low productivity of field rice, is Paku District, with a harvested
area of around 170 hectares of field rice and a production of around 442 tons
or a productivity of 2.60 tons/hectare. The low productivity of field rice in Paku
District is caused by the decrease in land area and harvested area. One of the
villages that have decreased field rice production is Kalamus Village. Kalamus
Village has an area of around 40 km2, only a harvest area of around
25 hectares in 2021, with average rice productivity of only around 2
tons/hectare (Kalamus,
2022). Low rice productivity has
resulted in a decrease in community interest in upland rice farming. It does
not rule out the possibility that in the future, field rice farming will no
longer be cultivated in this area; even though Paku District has the
potential for developing upland rice farming when viewed from the geographical conditions of the area, it has dry
land. Which is quite extensive, tends to be
hilly, and is a mineral soil; some of these conditions play an essential role
in upland rice farming.
Based on this background, this research is attractive,
especially finding novelty in managing permanent Field Paddy with all the
problems farmers face. Another interesting problem is that farmers already use
pesticides on field rice plants. Previously, field rice was a non-pesticide or
organic food crop, but with permanent management and tend to be intensive,
pesticides are one of the technologies that help farmers manage their land.
Previously, Field
rice was not maintained intensively, relying on nature's grace.
The main problem in this research is the factors that
influence the production of dry field rice on settled land, including planting
area; variety and several seeds used; type and amount of pesticide used; and
labor in the management of field rice farming. Based on the background and
research problems, the research objectives were determined to determine the
factors that influence the production of field rice in Kalamus Village, Paku
District, East Barito Regency, Central Kalimantan Province.
METHODS
Place and time of research
This research was located in Kalamus Village, Paku District, East
Barito Regency; the location selection was carried out purposively (purposive sampling), considering that
Kalamus Village is a village where the community still cultivates field rice. This research was carried out for six months, from
June to November 2022.
Data source
The research data
includes primary and secondary data; primary data comes from field rice farmers
as respondents or data sources that provide information to researchers
directly. Secondary data is all data obtained indirectly from the object under
study in the form of books, literature, journals, and scientific reports related
to research (Djam,
2014).
Sampling
Method
����������� The method used in this study uses a survey method. Determination
of the sample using the saturated sample method, in which the entire population
is used as a sample. The sampling technique in this study used the Saturated
Sampling Technique, where saturated sampling is a sampling technique when all
members of the population are sampled; this is done when the population size is
relatively small or the researcher wants to make generalizations with minimal
errors (Sugiyono, 2017). The population in this study were all field rice farmers in the
village of Kalamus, namely a total of 35 family farmers.
Method of
collecting data
Data collection is a
systematic and standard procedure to obtain the data needed to support this
research. The data collection techniques used are as follows:
1.
Library
studies, namely studies by studying books or other written materials, have
something to do with the research being carried out.
2.
Field
studies, namely studies of collecting data directly into the field in the
following ways: (1) Observation, namely data collection techniques carried out
through field observations of research objects, (2) Interviews, namely direct
communication with farmers or other parties relating to the problems studied
utilizing question and answer, (3) Questionnaire, which is the primary tool
used in this study, distributed with questions that have been prepared.
Data Processing and Analysis Methods
Researchers used
multiple linear regression analysis to answer the research objective, namely to
determine the factors that influence the
production of field rice farming in Kalamus Village,
Paku District, East Barito Regency. Multiple linear regression analysis is an equation model that explains the relationship of one
independent/response variable (Y) with two or more independent
variables/predictors (X1, X2, X3, X4).
Multiple linear regression analysis is used because more than one factor
affects dryland rice production. The tool used to analyze multiple linear
regression in this study is the IBM SPSS (Statistical et al.) version 26
application.
���������� The multiple linear regression equation is
expressed mathematically by:
Y = α + β 1 X 1 +
β 2 X 2 + β 3 X 3 + β 4 X 4 + e
Where:
Y ���������������������� = Field Rice Farming
Production
α ���������������������� =
Constant
β 1 , β 2, β 3, β 4 =
Regression coefficient values
X 1 �������������������� = Planted Area (Ha)
X 2 ��������� �������������� =
Seed (Kg)
X 3 �������������������� = Pesticide (Liters)
X 4 �������������������� = Labor (HOK)
e ���������������������� = Errors
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Analysis of
Factors Influencing Field Rice Production
The analysis
used to determine the factors that influence the production of field rice
farming in Kalamus Village, Paku District, East Barito Regency, uses the
Multiple Linear Regression Analysis model. Data processing using computer aids
with the SPSS version 26 program. Where the
dependent variable is Field Rice Farming Production (Y), and the independent
variables are Planted Area (X1), Seed (X2), Pesticides (X3),
and Labor (X4). Before analyzing the data using multiple linear
regression analysis, the data has passed the classical assumption test so that
the estimation of parameters and regression coefficients is not biased. This
classic assumption test includes normality, multicollinearity, autocorrelation,
and heteroscedasticity tests.
Based on the
study's results, what generally influences rice production is the factor of land area, Urea
fertilizer, Phonska fertilizer, pesticides, and labor (Wadu et al., 2019). Output Regression Results Factors
that influence Field Rice Production in Kalamus Village, Paku District, East
Barito Regency can be seen in Table 3 below:
Table 3. Regression
Output Results of Factors Affecting Field Rice Production
|
|
Regression Coefficient |
t value count |
Significant |
|
Constant |
23,284 |
.090 |
.929 |
|
Planted Area (X1) |
1498,869 |
5.367** |
.000 |
|
Seed (X2) |
10,296 |
1,594* |
.121 |
|
Pesticides (X3) |
3,689 |
.420 |
.678 |
|
Labor (X4) |
-7,438 |
-2,057** |
048 |
Processed
primary data sources, 2022.
*=
Significance at 85% confidence level; t table = 0.15
**=
Significance at 95% confidence level; t table = 0.05
Based on
the results of the analysis using multiple linear regression, it can be
described that; simultaneously with the F test, showing that all variables,
namely the planted area factor (X1), the seed factor (X2),
the pesticide factor (X3), and the labor factor (X4)
which are included in the model, have a significant effect on field rice
production, but partially using the t-test, showing that only the planting area
factor (X1), seed factor (X2), labor factor (X4),
which is significant to the increase in field rice production (Y) in the
village Kalamus, Paku District, East Barito Regency.
This can
be explained by the fact that the planting area factor has a calculated value
of 5.367 > ttable 2.042 and a significance value of 0.000
<0.05; it can be concluded that the planting area (X1) has a
significant (significant) effect on production (Y), with a positive value means
that the addition of planting area will also show a significant increase in
production. This can be
explained by; External Planting factors affecting production, meaning that the
area of land planted by farmers and their families increases, and the
production area also increases, increasing production. The regression coefficient
value of Planted Area (X1) is 1498.869, meaning that each additional
Planting of 1 ha will increase field rice production by 1498.869 Kg. Based on
the results of this analysis, it is explained that the wider the land used, the
greater the production produced. This is in line with the statement that the
size of production from farming is influenced, among other things, by the
narrowness of the land used (Rahmawati et al., 2019);
(Sukmayanto et al., 2022). The land used by farmers in Kalamus Village, Paku District, East Barito
Regency, when the research was conducted, was permanent cultivation land,
meaning that farmers planted field rice without moving.
The second factor that is significant in the model
used is the seed factor (X2), which gets a value of 1.594
> 1.310 ttable, which means that the seed (X2) has a
significant effect on field rice production (Y), meaning it is increasing (a
lot) the number of seeds planted will increase the amount of production because
the number of seeds planted is generally adjusted to the area of the planted
area. The seed factor with a regression coefficient of 10.296 means that every
additional 1 kg of seed will increase field rice production by 10.296 kg. In
line with the study, the seed variable positively affects rice production (Marhan et al., 2020); (Sukmayanto et al., 2022). Seed is an essential factor in
determining the success of upland rice farming. The seeds upland rice farmers
use are local varieties in which field rice is divided into rich local
varieties (Karangdukuh, Radenweat)
and local light varieties (Palui et
al.). Heavy local varieties are rice seeds requiring a longer planting time
than local light varieties. Therefore, rich local rice varieties will be
planted faster than light local varieties. Heavy local varieties will be
planted first in early November, while light local varieties will be planted a
month later in December each year. The average number of rice seeds used is
20-35 kg/0.50-0.75 hectares. In contrast, the seeds planted are harvested from
the previous planting season.
Furthermore, the Labor factor (X4) gets a tcount
value of � 2.057 < t table 2.042, with a significance
level of 0.048 < 0.05, so that Labor (X4) has a significant
effect on Field Rice Production (Y), but has a coefficient value negative,
meaning that if the workforce is increased, field rice production will
decrease. This illustrates that the area of land for field rice farming has
decreased if 10-15 years ago, there were still many farmers managing field
rice, but the number of farmers/cultivators has decreased; this is indicated by
the total population of cultivator farmers of only 35 people, and this number
will likely decrease in the coming years, the impact of the management system
that has been settled and the ban on forest and land burning. Labor is
generally significant to production� (Ashar & Balkis, 2018); (Rahmawati et al., 2019); (Sukmayanto et al., 2022). showing the value of the regression coefficient or the
elasticity of labor, which is hostile (Yusmiati, 2020). The workforce
used in field rice management in Kalamus Village, Paku District, East Barito
Regency, generally only uses family labor.
Results of analysis of Pesticide
production factors (X3), with
a tcount value of 0.420 < t -table 1.310
and 2.042, which means that the pesticide factor (X3) has no
significant effect on field rice production. The regression coefficient is
3.689, which means that every addition of 1 liter of pesticide (X3)
will only increase rice production by 3.689 kg. Pesticides are one of the new
agricultural technologies adopted by field farmers. Generally, the fields do
not use pesticides in their management. The use of pesticides in sedentary
cultivation is due to the increased intensity of pests and diseases; this is
presumably due to the cultivation of land close to oil palm plantations, where
intensive management uses pesticides in tackling pests and diseases that attack
so that pests and diseases are eradicated from plantations. Palm oil shifted to
community cultivation land. This is
in line with research (Lailiyah et al., 2018); (Abas & Noer, 2019); (Wulan
et al., 2022) that rice production is not always affected by the use of
pesticides.
Farmers
use pesticides to tackle pests and diseases in rice plants; the pesticides used are divided into
herbicides, insecticides, and fungicides. Herbicides control weeds in rice
plants; the herbicides used are Roundup, gramophone, Ultron, and Lindomin. Insecticides are used to prevent
and control insect pests in rice plants; the insecticides used are vitako,
dharmas, plenum, furan, and talon. Meanwhile, fungicides treat bacterial
pests such as yellow stem borer. The fungicides used
are Amistartop, antra col, topspin, and Explore.
CONCLUSION
Based on the results of
the study showed that the factors influencing the production of upland rice
farming on settled land, simultaneously or together (Test F), showed that the
variables of planting area (X1), seeds (X2), pesticides
(X3), and labor Work (X4) jointly influences field rice
production (Y). However, partially or individually (t-test), it shows that the
variables of planted area (X1), seeds (X2), and labor (X4)
have a significant or significant effect on field rice production (Y), while
pesticides (X3) do not significant effect on Production (Y). Based
on the results of this study, the researchers suggest that farmers be more open
to technological advances in agriculture, especially understanding the use of
pesticides, in managing their fields, so that they can help manage land
optimally in Paddy Field farming. Further studies are needed because fertilizer
or other factors have yet to be included in the model used by researchers, so
it is suggested that future researchers include fertilizer or other factors as
independent variables, considering that the managed land is now settled.
REFERENCES
Abas, A., & Noer, H. (2019). Faktor-Faktor
Yang Mempengaruhi Produksi Tanaman Padi Gogo Di Kabupaten Morowali. Jurnal Agrotech, 9(1), 16�25. https://doi.org/10.31970/agrotech.v9i1.29
Ashar, A., & Balkis, S. (2018). Faktor-Faktor Yang
Mempengaruhi Produksi Padi Sawah (Oryza Sativa L.) Di Desa Binalawan Kecamatan
Sebatik Barat Kabupaten Nunukan (Factors Influencing Production of Wetland
Paddy (Oryza sativa L.) in Binalawan Village West Sebatik Subdistrict Nunukan
Dist. Jurnal Agribisnis Dan Komunikasi Pertanian (Journal of Agribusiness and
Agricultural Communication), 1(2), 65�73. http://dx.doi.org/10.35941/jakp.1.2.2018.1707.65-73
Djam, S. (2014). an dan Aan Komariah, 2014. Metodologi
Penelitian Kualitatif Bandung: Alfabeta.
Indonesia, B. P. S. (2022). Laporan Luas panen dan produksi
Padi di Indonesia Tahun 2022. Indonesia.
Kalamus, I. W. D. (2022). Luas lahan pertanian di Desa
Wuran 2022. Kalamus.
Lailiyah, N., Timisela, N. R., & Kaplale, R. (2018). Analisis produksi padi sawah (Oryza
sativa L) tadah hujan di Desa Lea Wai Kecamatan Seram Utara Timur Kobi. AGRILAN: Jurnal Agribisnis Kepulauan, 5(2), 151�165.
Marhan, M., Ferrianta, Y., & Salawati, U. (2020).
Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Produksi Padi Gogo Di Desa Belangian,
Kecamatan Aranio, Kabupaten Banjar. Frontier Agribisnis, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.20527/frontbiz.v4i3.2914
Paradisa, Y. B., Indrayani, S., Wibowo, H., Perdani, A. Y.,
Priadi, D., Deswina, P., Adi, E. B. M., Mulyaningsih, E. S., Sulistyowati, Y.,
& Anggraheni, Y. G. D. (2022). Evaluasi 36 Genotipe Padi Gogo Terhadap
Cekaman Biotik Dan Abiotik Pada Enam Lokasi Berbeda: Evaluasi 36 Genotipe Padi
Gogo Terhadap Cekaman Biotik Dan Abiotik Pada Enam Lokasi Berbeda. AGROSAINSTEK:
Jurnal Ilmu Dan Teknologi Pertanian, 6(1), 12�22. https://doi.org/10.33019/agrosainstek.v6i1.286
Putri, A. E., Ernawiati, E., Priyambodo, P., Agustrina, R.,
& Chrisnawati, L. (2022). Klorofil Sebagai Indikator Tingkat Toleransi
Kekeringan Kecambah Padi Gogo Varietas Lokal Lampung, Lumbung Sewu Cantik. Biota:
Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Hayati, 142�150. https://doi.org/10.24002/biota.v7i2.5150
Rahmawati, E., Nugroho, A. E., & Defri, A. (2019).
Analisis Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Produksi Padi Sawah di Desa Sebulu Ilir
Kecamatan Sebulu Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara. Rawa Sains: Jurnal Sains STIPER
Amuntai, 9(2), 68�76. https://doi.org/10.36589/rs.v9i2.100
Salsadilla, P., & Hariyono, K.
(2022). Respon Pertumbuhan dan Hasil Tiga Varietas Padi Gogo (Oryza sativa L.)
pada Berbagai Kondisi Cekaman Kekeringan. Berkala Ilmiah Pertanian, 5(1),
45�51. https://doi.org/10.19184/bip.v5i1.29356
Sugiyono, P. D. (2017). Metode
penelitian bisnis: pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, kombinasi, dan R&D. Penerbit
CV. Alfabeta: Bandung, 225, 87.
Sukmayanto, M., Hasanuddin, T., & Listiana, I. (2022).
Analisis Produksi dan Pendapatan Usahatani Padi di Kabupaten Lampung Tengah. Jurnal
Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis (JEPA), 6(2), 625�634.
Tengah, B. P. S. P. K. (2022). Luas Wilayah dan Kondisi
Geografis Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah. Palangka Raya.
Wadu, J., Yuliawati, Y., & Nuswantara, B. (2019).
Strategi menghadapi risiko produksi padi sawah di Kabupaten Sumba Timur. Jurnal
Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 22(2), 231�256.
Wulan, S., Indriani, R., & Bempah, I. (2022). Pengaruh
Penggunaan Faktor-Faktor Produksi Terhadap Produksi Usahatani Padi Sawah Di
Desa Bulotalangi Kecamatan Bulango Timur. Agrinesia: Jurnal Ilmiah
Agribisnis, 6(2), 118�125. https://doi.org/10.37046/agr.v6i2.15913
Yusmiati. (2020). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi
Produksi Usahatani Padi Di Kecamatan Libureng Kabupaten Bone. Universitas
Muhammadiyah Makassar.
|
�
2023 by the authors. Submitted for possible open-access publication under the
terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY SA) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). |