Water Quality Assessment in
Hong Xeng Channel,
Vientiane Capital
Phoummixay Siharath1, Somchay
Vilaychaleun2, Khampasith Thammathevo3,
Chankhachone Sonemanivong4, Soulyphan Kannitha5,
Phetsakhone Nhaovarath6,
Keoduangchai Keokhamphui7
Environmental Engineering
Department, Faculty of Engineering, National University of Laos1,2,3
Civil Engineering Department,
Faculty of Engineering, National University of Laos4,5,6
Faculty of Water Resources, National University of Laos7
[email protected]1, [email protected]2, [email protected]3,
[email protected]4, [email protected]5, [email protected]6, [email protected]7
ABSTRACT
In the
capital Vientiane, households, communities and factories discharge wastewater
into the Hong Xeng canal, which flows into the Thatluang wetland, where it ends
up in the Mak Heiw stream and falls into the Mekong River. Water quality
assessment is an excellent factor in indicating the existing water condition.
Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate and collect water samples
at 3 locations (P1, P2, and P3) to understand the status of water quality, and
analyze 12 water samples of the Hong Xeng Canal and also compare the findings
with past data by standard. Methods Data was collected and analyzed in the
laboratory for two months from 25 August 2008 to 6 October 2008. The results
showed that the temperature was 28�C - 31.1�C, Nitrate ion (NO3-) was 3.2 mg/l
- 46 mg/l, pH 5.9-6.6, electrical conductivity 87 �S/cm - 283 �S/cm, Total
Suspended Solid (TSS) 22 mg/l -78 mg/l and CODMn 5.5 mg/l - 10 ,9mg/l.
Therefore, these parameters are recognized and substandard. While turbidity was
42 NTU -78 NTU, BOD5 4.5 mg/l - 9.1 mg/l, Dissolved Oxygen (DO) 9.1 mg/l - 10.6
mg/l and Phosphate (PO43-) 0.05 mg/l - 0.25 mg/l. this parameter is higher
concentration and above standard.
Corresponding
Author: �Phoummixay Siharath
E-mail:
[email protected]
INTRODUCTION
Vientiane Capital locates in central part of Lao PDR (Vongpraseuth et al., 2022). The population� was
795,000 in 2009 (Sims, 2015). The annual population growth rate was 3.1% in 1985; the whole
area is 3,920 km2, with a density of 176 people per Km2 (Hayward, 2017). The infrastructures and services have improved significantly
over the last five years, with significant investments in primary roads and
drainage funded by Asian Development
Bank (ADB), other funding agencies, and the Government, focusing
on primary infrastructure constrained the ability of the newly constructed
infrastructure to realize its full potential benefits (Citaristi, 2022). In the last decade years, infrastructure projects have been
constructed in Laos, especially in Vientiane Capital such as roads, channels, creeks,
and many constructions were completed (Sivongxay et al., 2017). Therefore, the Hong Xeng channel is one more extensive channel
in Vientiane Capital (Oraboune, 2013). The channel was constructed by concrete. It receives wastewater
from households, communities and factories, discharges to drains to Thatluang
wetland, then end in the Mak Heiw stream and falls to the Mekong River �(McCartney et al., 2015).� The Hong Xeng channel system
flows through three urban districts: sikhottabong, Chanthaboury and Saysetha (Sychareun et al., 2015). There are three central drainage
channel systems in Vientiane Capital such as: Hong Xeng, Hong Ke and Hong Khoua
Khao. All system discharge wastewater into the Thatluang wetland (Hayward, 2017). Hong Xeng mainly drains wastewater from the Sikhottabong
district and some part of the Chanthabouly district through Nong Duang marsh
and Pasak stream, then drains to the Thatluang wetland part of Saysettha
district as indicated in Figure 1. Due to the number of population and
residents increased continuously and also factors of the social economics
development were supported by government and other stakeholders on industrial
business, water use and consumption are also increased as well, there are considerable
amounts of wastewater drains to the Hong xeng channel (Abdelbaki, 2022). Therefore, the water quality assessment is a part of water prevention
and play significant role to waste water management in order to monitor and sustain
on the water (Cheng et al., 2020).
Figure 1. Study Location
Based on
the above background, the purpose of this study was to investigate and collect
water samples in 3 locations (P1, P2, and P3) to understand the water quality
status, as well as assess and analyze 12 water samples of the Hong Xeng Canal
and also compare the findings with previous data with standard.
Methodology
Data collection
To realize the status of the water quality at site study, the
research was designed the locations and also to identify reasonable time between
the rainy and dry season to collect the data, therefore, data was collected 4
times over two months from 25 August to 6 October 2008. As Figure 2 shows the
site 1 (P1, Hong Xeng bridge), it is at the border between Phone Tong and
Savang villages. This site is a point of discharge wastewater from the Hong
Pasak channel, which covers part of the Chanthabuly district through rehabilitation
of the Sihom area; as indicated in Figure 3, site 2 (P2, Hong Kaikeo) locates
in Hong Kaikeo village. This site is the discharge point of the Hong Kaikeo
drainage channel, which covers part of the Chanthabuly and Saysettha districts.
The water flood and wastewater from households and factories are discharged
into the Hong Kaikeo drainage channel. Site 3 (P3) is runoff to Thaluang
wetland, as indicated in Figure 4; this area is covered by the paddy
fields on both sides of the channel. Therefore, in order to assess and analyze
the water quality, there are significant parameters that needs to conduct in
the study according to the water quality standard for instance: temperature, Nitrate
ion (NO3-), pH, Electric Conductivity, Total Suspended
Solid (TSS), CODMn, turbidity, BOD, Dissolved Oxygen (DO) and
Phosphate (PO43-), they were tested and analyzed based on
the methods of the water experiment in the laboratory, and then the results
were translated based on the environmental quality guidelines and compared with
Chinaimo Water Treatment Plant Laboratory (CWTPL) in 2005, Science Technology and Environment Agency (STEA)
laboratory in 2003 and Irrigation laboratory between 1993-1994 (Gorde & Jadhav, 2013).
�
|
Figure 2. Site P1 |
Figure 3. Site P2 |
Figure 4. Site P3 |
To ensure that the water sample quality,
control was practiced and monitoring personnel were trained in the laboratory.
This maintains the same standards and quality for sampling, preservation, analysis,
and subsequent interpretation of the results. The researchers followed the
advice of WASA's laboratory; the measured parameters include temperature,
conductivity, and pH (Roy et al., 2018). Temperature and conductivity were measured by conductivity
meter, and pH value was measured by pH paper at sites �and the rests were tested in the laboratory (Rafique et al., 2014).
Data analysis
Water samples
were designed and collected at each site and assigned time, the experiment and
analysis were completed at Chinaimo Water Treatment Plant Laboratory (CWTPL).
Therefore, the results are shown as follows.
Table 1.
Water sample collection on the date 25 August 2008
|
Description of analysis |
Units |
Site P1 |
Site P2 |
Site P3 |
|
Village name |
|
Phonetong |
Hongkaikeo |
Viengchalern |
|
Temperature |
�C |
30.2 |
30.8 |
31.1 |
|
Turbidity |
NTU |
76 |
68 |
84 |
|
Nitrate ion (NO3-) |
mg/l |
10.2 |
5.8 |
4.6 |
|
pH |
|
5.9 |
6.0 |
6.1 |
|
Electric Conductivity |
�S/cm |
162 |
272 |
185 |
|
CODMn |
mg/l |
8.3 |
8.6 |
8.9 |
|
BOD5 |
mg/l |
7.5 |
5.7 |
3.3 |
|
Dissolved Oxygen (DO) |
mg/l |
9.1 |
9.2 |
9.6 |
|
Total Suspended Solid (TSS) |
mg/l |
45 |
33 |
57 |
|
Phosphate (PO43-) |
mg/l |
0.32 |
0.15 |
0.24 |
Table 2. Water sample collection on the date 8 September 2008
|
Description
of analysis |
Units |
Site
P1 |
Site
P2 |
Site
P3 |
|
Village
names |
|
Phontong |
Hongkaikeo |
Viengchalern |
|
Temperature |
�C |
29.5 |
30.0 |
30.0 |
|
Turbidity |
NTU |
63 |
49 |
71 |
|
Nitrate ion
(NO3-) |
mg/l |
8.8 |
4.6 |
3.2 |
|
pH |
|
6.0 |
6.0 |
6.0 |
|
Electric
Conductivity |
�S/cm |
170 |
283 |
197 |
|
CODMn |
mg/l |
10.2 |
10.3 |
10.9 |
|
BOD5 |
mg/l |
9.1 |
6.9 |
4.5 |
|
Dissolved
Oxygen (DO) |
mg/l |
10.5 |
10.5 |
10.6 |
|
Total Suspended Solid (TSS) |
mg/l |
34 |
22 |
35 |
|
Phosphate
(PO43-) |
mg/l |
0.20 |
<0.05 |
<0.05 |
Table 3. Water sample collection on date 22 September 2008
|
Description
of analysis |
Units |
Site P1 |
Site P2 |
Site P3 |
|
Village
names |
|
Phontong |
Hongkaikeo |
Viengchalern |
|
Temperature |
�C |
28.5 |
28.0 |
29.1 |
|
Turbidity |
NTU |
74 |
64 |
78 |
|
Nitrate ion
(NO3-) |
mg/l |
46 |
33 |
25 |
|
pH |
|
5.5 |
6.0 |
6.0 |
|
Electric
Conductivity |
�S/cm |
87 |
124 |
100 |
|
CODMn |
mg/l |
8.2 |
7.6 |
8.2 |
|
BOD5 |
mg/l |
4.2 |
4.7 |
1.3 |
|
Dissolved
Oxygen (DO) |
mg/l |
9.8 |
9.7 |
9.0 |
|
Total
Suspended Solid (TSS) |
mg/l |
100 |
50 |
50 |
|
Phosphate
(PO43-) |
mg/l |
<0.05 |
<0.05 |
<0.05 |
Table 4. Water sample data collection on the date 6 October 2008
|
Description
of analysis |
Units |
Site P1 |
Site P2 |
Site P3 |
|
Village
names |
|
Phontong |
Hongkaikeo |
Viengchalern |
|
Temperature |
�C |
29.1 |
29.8 |
30.1 |
|
NTU |
55 |
42 |
61 |
|
|
Nitrate ion
(NO3-) |
mg/l |
30 |
28 |
31 |
|
pH |
|
6.2 |
6.5 |
6.6 |
|
Electric
Conductivity |
�S/cm |
90 |
117 |
121 |
|
CODMn |
mg/l |
6.7 |
5.5 |
5.6 |
|
BOD5 |
mg/l |
3.6 |
4.2 |
1.0 |
|
Dissolved
Oxygen (DO) |
mg/l |
7.9 |
8.6 |
8.3 |
|
Total
Suspended Solid (TSS) |
mg/l |
88 |
35 |
40 |
|
Phosphate
(PO43-) |
mg/l |
0.24 |
0.15 |
0.18 |
Previous water quality
���������� The study was
given and supported the availability of previous data from three laboratories
as mentioned on section methodology. There were some parameter differences for
each laboratory.
Science Technology and Environment
Agency (STEA) laboratory
���������� The sampling
station N.13 (Hong Xeng bridge) in 2003 (Flow, 2013). The STEA laboratory monitored for six parameters such as pH,
Conductivity, Alkalinity, BOD5, COD and temperature. As indicated in
Table 5.�
Table 5. STEA
laboratory
|
Date |
pH |
Conductivity |
Alkalinity |
BOD5 |
COD |
Temperature |
|
|
(us/cm) |
(mgCaCo3/l) |
(mgO2/l) |
(mgO2/l) |
(0C) |
|
|
January |
7.38 |
491 |
193 |
20 |
130 |
19.2 |
|
February |
7.62 |
412 |
198 |
15 |
110 |
19.9 |
|
March |
7.58 |
398 |
193 |
8 |
90 |
25.5 |
|
April |
7.62 |
396 |
196 |
13 |
108 |
27.0 |
|
May |
7.41 |
410 |
183 |
15 |
125 |
30.0 |
|
June |
7.89 |
418 |
178 |
15 |
110 |
29.5 |
|
July |
7.85 |
512 |
185 |
10 |
118 |
28.5 |
|
August |
6.92 |
335 |
179 |
10 |
120 |
27.2 |
|
September |
7.63 |
507 |
192 |
12 |
120 |
26.5 |
|
October |
7.53 |
227 |
198 |
18 |
125 |
24.5 |
|
November |
6.98 |
269 |
213 |
13 |
115 |
22.0 |
|
December |
7 |
290 |
218 |
25 |
130 |
19.7 |
Chinaimo Water Treatment Plant Laboratory data
������� There were 12 stations to monitor and
investigate in Vientiane Capital in 2005; the Hong Xeng channel was monitored
on No. 11 at Viengchalern Village (Phanutda & Ho, 2019). Therefore, more details can be seen the table 6.
Table 6. Chinaimo Water Treatment Plant
Laboratory
|
Description
of analysis |
Units |
Date
to collect water samples |
||
|
|
|
14/02/2005 |
7/05/2005 |
4/10/2005 |
|
Air
temperature |
|
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
Temperature |
�C |
30.2 |
30.8 |
31.1 |
|
Turbidity |
NTU |
76 |
68 |
84 |
|
Nitrate ion
(NO3-) |
mg/l |
10.2 |
5.8 |
4.6 |
|
pH |
|
5.9 |
6.0 |
6.1 |
|
Electric
Conductivity |
�S/cm |
162 |
272 |
185 |
|
CODMn |
mg/l |
8.3 |
8.6 |
8.9 |
|
BOD5 |
mg/l |
7.5 |
5.7 |
3.3 |
|
Dissolved
Oxygen (DO) |
mg/l |
9.1 |
9.2 |
9.6 |
|
Total
Suspended Solid (TSS) |
mg/l |
45 |
33 |
57 |
|
Phosphate
(PO43-) |
mg/l |
0.32 |
0.15 |
0.24 |
|
Total-Phosphorus
(TP) |
mg/l |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
Alkalinity
(CaCO3) |
mg/l |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
Total
Dissolved Solids (TDS) |
mg/l |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Irrigation laboratory (Department
of Irrigation, MAF)
Data was
collected during the years 1993 � 1994, they were focused
on 11 parameters such as temperature, pH, TSS, conductivity, NO3, NH4,
PO4, Total Phosphate, silica, DO and CODMn.
Table 7. Data From the Irrigation Laboratory
|
SDATE |
T |
pH |
TSS_MGL |
CON_MSM |
NO32_MGL |
NH4N_MGL |
PO4P_MGL |
TOTP_MGL |
SI_MGL |
DO_MGL |
CODMN_MGL |
|
13/01/93 |
23.8 |
7.13 |
15.0 |
32.00 |
0.372 |
0.109 |
0.019 |
0.036 |
4.90 |
5.22 |
2.4 |
|
16/02/93 |
25.0 |
7.01 |
4.0 |
30.00 |
0.309 |
0.107 |
0.010 |
0.036 |
4.30 |
3.42 |
1.8 |
|
22/03/93 |
26.2 |
7.04 |
13.0 |
29.40 |
0.083 |
0.234 |
0.026 |
0.034 |
4.10 |
3.81 |
5.0 |
|
18/06/93 |
26.2 |
6.68 |
26.0 |
24.60 |
0.813 |
0.149 |
0.018 |
0.064 |
3.90 |
0.91 |
3.1 |
|
17/07/93 |
26.4 |
6.62 |
30.0 |
20.30 |
0.741 |
0.055 |
0.030 |
0.073 |
4.00 |
2.21 |
3.3 |
|
18/08/93 |
27.2 |
6.82 |
61.0 |
19.70 |
0.470 |
0.020 |
0.042 |
0.042 |
3.80 |
2.34 |
4.8 |
|
16/09/93 |
29.5 |
7.00 |
30.0 |
10.90 |
0.156 |
0.104 |
0.026 |
0.048 |
3.90 |
2.79 |
4.4 |
|
29/10/93 |
28.8 |
6.68 |
14.0 |
30.70 |
0.729 |
0.193 |
0.030 |
0.048 |
- |
- |
3.3 |
|
16/11/93 |
26.4 |
6.20 |
18.0 |
31.80 |
0.653 |
0.970 |
0.054 |
0.079 |
- |
6.40 |
6.7 |
|
15/02/94 |
29.4 |
7.23 |
6.0 |
32.40 |
1.401 |
0.026 |
0.110 |
0.164 |
6.20 |
5.12 |
4.8 |
|
17/03/94 |
26.6 |
7.03 |
8.0 |
30.10 |
0.300 |
0.120 |
0.030 |
0.052 |
5.50 |
4.57 |
4.8 |
|
20/04/94 |
27.0 |
7.84 |
11.0 |
30.60 |
0.547 |
0.012 |
0.046 |
0.058 |
5.80 |
4.76 |
4.8 |
|
15/09/94 |
28.8 |
6.68 |
50.0 |
11.50 |
0.215 |
0.192 |
0.036 |
0.081 |
8.20 |
1.92 |
3.9 |
|
17/10/94 |
29.6 |
6.76 |
30.0 |
20.50 |
0.108 |
0.183 |
0.044 |
0.095 |
8.60 |
2.21 |
4.1 |
|
14/11/94 |
29.2 |
7.12 |
35.0 |
30.70 |
0.700 |
0.187 |
0.025 |
0.500 |
7.80 |
3.66 |
3.3 |
|
16/12/94 |
28.4 |
7.37 |
20.0 |
31.80 |
0.651 |
0.972 |
0.050 |
0.066 |
7.60 |
3.01 |
5.2 |
Result and Discussion
Water temperature and pH during the rainy season.
Figure 5 indicates the findings of
temperature and also pH, between current and previous research. Table 1-7 show
that the current and past temperature, they were under the standard, because,
the standard of temperature and pH are 40�C and 9, respectively, therefore, the
current temperature is 28�C -31.1�C and the past temperature was
22�C in 2003 (STEA laboratory), as well as, the current pH is 5.9-6.6, and
the past pH value is 6.68 - 7.63. The pH value fluctuates under the standard range.
Figure
5. Temperature and pH
Turbidity and
Total Suspended Solid (TSS).
Figure 6 illustrates
the findings of turbidity and Total Suspended Solid, between current and
previous research, the standard of turbidity and Total Suspended Solid are 5
NTU and 80 mg/l, respectively, the Table 1-7 present that the current turbidity
was over the standard, the concentration was 42 mg/l -78 mg/l, because the
standard value is 5 NTU, but past turbidity was not available to compare, in
the meantime, the Total Suspended Solid (TSS) were under the standard.
Therefore, the current Total Suspended Solid (TSS) was 22 mg/l -78 mg/l and the
past Total Suspended Solid (TSS) was 17 mg/l -78 mg/l from the mean of three
previous study.
Figure 6. Turbidity and Total
Suspended Solid (TSS)
Electric Conductivity and Dissolve Oxygen
Figure 7 shows the findings of electric conductivity and Dissolve
Oxygen, between current and previous research, the standard of electric conductivity
and Dissolve Oxygen are 12,00 �S/cm and 4 mg/l, respectively, the Table 1-7 present
that the current and past electric conductivity was below the standard, the current
electric conductivity was 87 �S/cm -283 �S/cm and the past electric
conductivity was 162 �S/cm -512 �S/cm, meanwhile, therefore, the current Dissolved
Oxygen (DO) was 9.1 mg/l - 10.6 mg/l, it was above standard, and the
past Dissolved Oxygen (DO) was 0.91 mg/l - 9.6 mg/l ,it fluctuated
below and above the standard from the two previous study of the Chinaimo Water
Treatment Plant Laboratory (CWTPL) and Irrigation laboratory.
Figure 7. Conductivity and
Dissolve Oxygen (DO)
Phosphate (PO4---) and Nitrate ion (NO3-)
Figure 8 indicates the findings of Phosphate (PO4---)
and Nitrate ion (NO3-), between current and previous
research, the standard of Phosphate (PO4---) and Nitrate ion (NO3-)
are 2 �mg/l and 50 mg/l, respectively,
the Table 1-7 show that the current and past Phosphate (PO43-)
was below the standard, the current Phosphate (PO43-) was
0.05 mg/l - 0.25 mg/l. and the past Phosphate (PO43-) was
0.03 mg/l, simultaneously , Consequently, the current Nitrate ion (NO3-)
was 3.2 mg/l - 46 mg/l, it was above standard, and the past Nitrate ion (NO3-)
was 0.08 mg/l - 10.2 mg/l, it is below the standard from one previous study of
irrigation laboratory.
Figure
8. Phosphate and Nitrate ion (NO3)
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD)
and Chemical Oxygen Demand
Figure
9 shows the findings of Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) and Chemical Oxygen
Demand, between current and previous research, the standard of Biochemical
Oxygen Demand (BOD) and Chemical Oxygen Demand are 2 mg/l and 10 mg/l,
respectively, the Table 1-7 show that the current BOD5 was 4.5 mg/l
- 9.1 mg/l was above the standard and the past BOD5 was 18 mg/l - 35
mg/l, meanwhile, Hence, the current CODMn was 5.5 mg/l -10.9 mg/l,
it was below standard, and the past CODMn was 1.8 mg/l - 130 mg/l
,it is below the standard from three previous study .
Figure 9. Biochemical Oxygen
Demand and Chemical Oxygen Demand
Conclusions
In conclusion, the water quality assessment of the Hong Xeng
channel revealed that the concentrations of temperature, nitrate ion (NO3-),
pH, electric conductivity, total suspended solids (TSS), and CODMn were within
acceptable limits and met the standard. However, parameters such as turbidity,
BOD5, dissolved oxygen (DO), and phosphate (PO43-) exceeded the standard,
mainly due to urban runoff and stormwater inputs during the rainy season. These
elevated concentrations pose risks to the ecological system, biological life,
and nearby communities in terms of water pollution in the short and long term.
Measures should be taken to address the pollution sources and mitigate the
potential impact on the environment and human health..
REFERENCES
Abdelbaki, A. M. (2022). Suggested solutions for the problems
of salinity increase and cumulated pollution in Lake Qarun, Egypt: present and
future (A review). Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 13(3), 101588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.09.015
Cheng, D., Ngo, H. H., Guo, W., Chang, S. W., Nguyen, D. D.,
Liu, Y., Wei, Q., & Wei, D. (2020). A critical review on antibiotics and
hormones in swine wastewater: Water pollution problems and control approaches. Journal
of Hazardous Materials, 387, 121682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121682
Citaristi, I. (2022). Asian Development Bank�ADB. In The
Europa Directory of International Organizations 2022 (pp. 453�457).
Routledge.
Flow, P. O. (2013). Chinaimo Water Treatment Plant
Vientiane City, Lao PDR.
Gorde, S. P., & Jadhav, M. V.
(2013). Assessment of water
quality parameters: a review. J Eng Res Appl, 3(6), 2029�2035.
Hayward, D. (2017). Understanding institutional challenges
for urban planning in Vientiane capital, Lao PDR.
McCartney, M. P., Rebelo, L.-M., & Sellamuttu, S. S.
(2015). Wetlands, livelihoods and human health. Wetlands and Human Health,
123�148. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9609-5_7
Oraboune, S. (2013). Lao PDR and its North East Asian
development partners: China, Japan and Korea. Japan and Korea with the
Mekong River Basin Countries, 164�205.
Phanutda, I., & Ho, N. A. D. (2019). Removal of natural
organic matter from water by coagulation and flocculation to mitigate the
formation of chlorine-disinfection by-products: a case study at Chinaimo water
treatment plant, Vientiane capital, Laos. Vietnam Journal of Science,
Technology and Engineering, 61(4), 40�47. https://doi.org/10.31276/VJSTE.61(4).40-47
Rafique, H. M., Abbas, I., Sohl, M. A., Shehzadi, R., Ramay,
S. M., Imran, M., Al-Zaghayer, Y., Mahmood, A., & Sohl, M. N. (2014).
Appraisal of drinking water quality of tehsil Jampur, Pakistan. Desalination
and Water Treatment, 52(25�27), 4641�4648.
https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2013.803936
Roy, K., Akter, S., & Islam, M. (2018). Assessment of
Supplied Water Quality of Rajshahi Wasa (RWASA) in Bangladesh. Proceedings
of the 4th International Conference on Civil Engineering for Sustainable
Development (ICCESD 2018), KUET, Khulna, Bangladesh.
Sims, K. (2015). Uneven geographies of transnational
capitalism in Laos. In Globalization and transnational capitalism in Asia
and Oceania (pp. 213�227). Routledge.
Sivongxay, A., Greiner, R., & Garnett, S. T. (2017).
Livelihood impacts of hydropower projects on downstream communities in central
Laos and mitigation measures. Water Resources and Rural Development, 9,
46�55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wrr.2017.03.001
Sychareun, V., Hansana, V., Phengsavanh, A., Chaleunvong, K.,
& Tomson, T. (2015). Perceptions and acceptability of pictorial health
warning labels vs text only-a cross-sectional study in Lao PDR. BMC Public
Health, 15, 1�10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2415-9
Vongpraseuth, T., Song, E. Y., & Choi, C. G. (2022). Mode
of Transport and Inequity in a Least Developed Country: The Case of Vientiane,
Lao PDR. Sustainability, 14(10), 5959. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105959
|
|
� 2023 by
the authors. Submitted for possible open-access publication under the terms
and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY SA) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). |