THE
INFLUENCE OF HUMAN RESOURCES, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY,
AND
INTERNAL CONTROL SYSTEMS ON BUDGET PREPARATION WITH
EXTERNAL
FACTORS AS MODERATING VARIABLES
Mega Arthika Dewi1,
Unggul Purwohedi2, IGKA Ulupui3�
Universitas
Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
[email protected]1,
[email protected]2,
[email protected]3
![]()
ABSTRACT
This research aims to determine the effect of Human
Resources, Information Technology, and Internal Control System on budget
preparation by considering external factors as moderating variables. The focus
of this research is the planning staff at Lemdiklat Polri and its ranks, which
include Lemdiklat Polri, 34 SPN, and 15 Pusdik. The method used in this study
is quantitative, using the SmartPLS 4.0 program. Data were collected through a
survey of 50 respondents of planning staff in Lemdiklat Polri and its ranks.
The results showed that Human Resources had no significant effect on budget
preparation. In contrast, Information Technology and Internal Control System
have a significant influence on budgeting. However, external factors do not
moderate the influence of the Internal Control System on budget preparation.
The implications of this study include providing theoretical contributions that
show that the effectiveness of Information Technology and the strength of the
Internal Control System are significant in the budgeting process. Practically,
the results of this study provide recommendations to Lemdiklat Polri to further
optimize the use of information technology and strengthen the internal control
system to improve efficiency and accuracy in budget preparation.
Keywords: Human Resources, Information Technology,
Internal Control System, Budget Preparation.
![]()
Corresponding Author: Mega Arthika Dewi
E-mail: [email protected]
INTRODUCTION
The growth of the public sector in Indonesia is an
integral part of economic dynamics and national development. The public sector
covers all economic activities undertaken by both central and local
governments, including public services, infrastructure investment, and social
spending. Various factors, including government policies, global economic
conditions, and internal challenges, such as regional inequality and poverty,
influence the growth of the public sector in Indonesia. Public sector growth in
Indonesia has a close relationship with public sector accounting.
Public sector accounting is an accounting practice
applied by government entities, including the central government, local
governments, and other public bodies. The growth of public sector accounting in
Indonesia has accelerated with the Reformation Era in the early 2000s; this is
evidenced by the demand for accountability for public institutions at the
central and regional levels. The success or failure of an organization's
mission implementation in reaching predefined goals and objectives through a
periodically implemented accountability medium-state financial management, for
example-is measured by accountability.
State financial management in Indonesia is one of the
main functions of government that aims to ensure the availability of resources
needed to carry out development and public services. State financial management
includes the planning, use, and supervision of state funds. Several national
laws regulate state financial management in Indonesia. Law Number 15 of 2004
about Amendments to Law Number 17 of 2003 concerning State Finance, Law Number
24 of 2007 concerning Regional Financial Administration and Management, and Law
Number 1 of 2004 concerning Treasury are a few significant laws pertaining to
state financial management.�
State financial management and budgeting have a very
close and interrelated relationship. Budgeting is one of the main components of
state financial management, and both aim to ensure the efficient, effective and
responsible use of state resources.
The demand for the importance of implementing
performance-based budgeting has brought consequences that must be prepared as a
trigger factor for the successful implementation of the use of
performance-based budgeting, namely: 1) Emphasis on continual administrative
improvement; 2) Leadership and commitment from all organisational components;
and 3) Adequate resources (cash, labour, and people) for such improvement
initiatives; 4) Explicit incentives and penalties; 5) A burning ambition for
success (BPKP, 2005).
A budget is a financial plan for the future that
includes revenues, costs, and other financial transactions within one year. In
public sector organizations, the budget includes plans about the costs of the
plans that have been prepared by the organization/work unit and how to obtain a
budget to fund the activities that have been prepared. Budgeting is a principle
of accountability in the budgeting process, which starts with planning,
preparation, and implementation (Manik & Sari,
2022).
Budgeting begins with the identification of goals,
objectives, and strategies. Consensus among all parties or divisions on the
objectives to be achieved is a key factor in planning the budget. The budgeting
process is long and involves gruelling stages, often resulting in problems such
as inaccuracies and a lack of insight into how to develop an effective budget (Manik & Sari,
2022).
In addition to being in charge of preparing the budget
in its work units, Lemdiklat Polri also has a role as the bearer of the Polri
HR professionalism program, which is in charge of preparing the entire Polri
Education budget in Indonesia, starting from the formation of education,
vocational education, development education, to higher education. A phenomenon
that occurs in Lemdiklat Polri is that in the current budget year, Lemdiklat
Polri often revises its budget. In 2022, Lemdiklat Polri revised its budget six
times, including due to 1) Changes in Education Quota, 2) Changes in budget
nomenclature, 3) Addition of Priority Program Activities, 4) Additional
activities, 5) Changes in the budget for student meals at SPN, Pusdik and
Schools; and 6) Budget reductions, as a result of Automatic Adjustment from the
Ministry of Finance. Then, in 2023, Lemdiklat Polri revised the budget five
times, including due to 1) Changes in Education Quota, 2) Changes in budget
nomenclature, 3) Addition of activities, 4) Changes in the budget for student
meals at SPN, Pusdik and Schools; and 5) Budget reductions as a result of
Automatic Adjustment from the Ministry of Finance.
The time and preparation required to revise the budget
at Lemdiklat Polri is longer than that of other work units within the National
Police. This is due to the need to revise not only the Budget Implementation
List (DIPA) of Lemdiklat Polri but also the DIPAs of the State Police Schools,
Education Centers and Schools. The Budget Preparation Section in Lemdiklat
Polri and its ranks play a vital role as a public service that emphasizes the
budget aspect. Effective budget management will provide strong support for the
bureaus/bags within the work units to carry out their functions and tasks
properly, as budgetary needs are met and supported by skilled human resources.
According to Suyanto (2012), two factors influence budget preparation:
system factors and people factors. The system in question concerns the rules in
the organization or work unit, while the people factor concerns human
resources.
Research conducted by (Wahyuni et al., 2023) the quality of human resources and leadership style
have a positive impact on budget preparation capability, according to the study
titled The Effect of Commitment, Quality of Human Resources, and Leadership
Style on Budget Preparation Capability at the Government Education and Culture
Office in Buleleng Regency. Commitment, however, has little bearing on
budgetary capability.�
Research results (Wahyuni et al., 2023) supported by (Ismid et al., 2020) examine the Factor Analysis Affecting the Regional
Budgetary Preparation (Case Study on the Regional Asset, Revenue, and Financial
Management Agency of Karo Regency). The results of the multiple regression
analysis indicate that Human Resources, Organizational Commitment, and
Administrative System Improvement positively influence the preparation of the
Regional Expenditure Revenue budget. This finding is consistent with previous
research (Syamsuddin, 2022) regarding the Effect of Organizational Commitment,
Administrative System Improvement, and Human Resources on Performance-Based
Budgeting of the Education Office in Pohuwati Regency. From multiple regression
analysis, the results of organizational Commitment, administrative system
improvement, and human resources have a positive effect on performance-based
budgeting in the education office. From the above results, if the quality of
human resources is further improved, it will affect the preparation of a better
budget.
Earlier studies investigated the impact of Human
Resources Competence, Transparency, and Information Technology Utilization on
the preparation of Regional Revenue and Expenditure Budgets in Medan City (Lubis & Shara,
2021). From Multiple Regression analysis, the result is
that Human Resources Competence, Transparency and Information Technology
Utilization have a positive effect on the preparation of Regional Revenue and
Expenditure Budgets in Medan City. The results of this study are supported by
research (Ismid et al., 2020) concerning the Analysis of Factors Influencing the
Preparation of Performance-Based Regional Revenue and Expenditure Budgets in
the Aceh Singkil District Government. From the results of multiple regressions,
organizational Commitment, organizational system improvement, quality of human
resources, reward, and punishment have a positive effect on performance-based
regional budgeting. From the above results, if the quality of information
technology in the budget preparation process is sufficient and supportive, it
will affect the preparation of a better budget.
Previous research on the Effect of Human Resource
Quality, Internal Control System and Performance-Based Budget System at Ganesha
University of Education reveals that the quality of Human Resources, Internal
Control System, and Performance-Based Budget System positively influence DIPA
Budget Absorption (Anggeadi et al., 2023).
Previous research on the effect of external
information on the preparation of the company's budget that has gone public has
shown that external information has a positive effect on the preparation of the
company's budget (AMIN, 2013). The results of this study are supported by research (Proverra, 2003) The results of this study are supported by research
(Proverra, 2003) on the Influence of External Information on Corporate
Budgeting in West Sumatra have the results that the Influence of External
Information has a positive effect on Corporate Budgeting in West Sumatra.
Research (Yendrawati, 2013) on the Influence of the Internal Control System and
Human Resource Capacity on the Quality of Financial Statement Information,
considering External Factors as Moderating Variables, finds that external
factors moderate the impact of the internal control system on the quality of
financial statement information.
Based on the description above, only research (Anggeadi et al., 2023) uses the Internal Control System as an Independent
variable but is associated with Budget Absorption. Meanwhile, no one uses it as
an independent variable in Budget Preparation Research. The Internal Control
System in the Budget Preparation Process is essential. Internal control serves
to direct, supervise, and measure an organization's resources. It is crucial
for preventing and detecting fraud. When the internal control system is weak,
it can lead to numerous instances of regional asset embezzlement, ultimately
causing significant harm to the country. A stronger Internal Control System in an
Institution/agency will increase the accountability and transparency of an
agency's budget management. On the contrary, if the Internal Control System in
an institution/agency is weak, it will allow abuse of power so that budget
irregularities occur.
In previous research, no
research has been found that uses external factors, namely inflation,
Information Technology, Policy and Force Majeure, as moderating variables in
budget preparation research (Dwiyanthi, 2022). Inflation can affect the
budgeting process because the state of the country's economy, which is going up
or down, certainly affects the supply of products or services created by the
company. These economic conditions can be seen from the monthly or annual
inflation rate in general or specifically seen from the classification of
products and services. The role of technology in budget preparation Such
application services can help employees in the budget preparation process and
minimize errors. However, the development of technology is getting higher, and
it must be harmonized with the ability of human resources to manage
applications. So that technological developments do not become a boomerang for
institutions/agencies. Policy in the budgeting process is critical if there is
a change in policy by the leadership in the current fiscal year. Then, there
will be adjustments to the budget of a related institution/agency. In the preparation of the budget, Force Majeure has an
important role, for example, when COVID-19 occurred in Indonesia. The National
Police must readjust its budget in order to meet the needs for masks, hand
sanitizers, vitamins, and swabs that were not previously allocated. The
existence of external factors as moderating variables in research can
strengthen or otherwise weaken the influence of the Internal Control System on
Budget Preparation.
Based on the background above, this study aims to
determine the effect of Human Resources, Information Technology, and Internal
Control Systems on budget preparation by considering external factors as
moderating variables. This research provides significant benefits both
theoretically and practically. Theoretically, it contributes to the academic
field by expanding the existing literature on the interaction between
organizational resources and external factors in budget preparation processes.
Practically, the findings of this study can help organizations enhance their
budgeting accuracy and efficiency by highlighting the critical roles of human
resources, information technology, and internal control systems. Additionally,
policymakers and management professionals can utilize these insights to develop
better strategies and frameworks for effective budget management, ensuring that
external influences are adequately accounted for.
METHOD
This study uses a
quantitative method with a survey approach. The population in this study were
50 work units under the auspices of the National Police Training Headquarters.
The sample was taken using the purposive sampling technique, which is the
selection of samples based on specific criteria. The respondents selected were
planning staff who were directly involved in the preparation of budgets in
these work units. The data collection technique used was a questionnaire
distributed to selected respondents. Data analysis was carried out using the
SmartPLS 4.0 program to test the effect of independent variables (Human
Resources, Information Technology, Internal Control System) on the dependent
variable (Budget Preparation) with moderating variables (External Factors). The
conceptual framework in this study is:

Figure 1. Conceptual Framework
Thus, the
hypothesis in this study:
|
H1 |
: |
Human Resources
has a positive effect on the budget preparation of Lemdiklat Polri and its
ranks. |
|
H2 |
: |
Information
technology has a positive effect on the budget preparation of Lemdiklat Polri
and its ranks. |
|
H3 |
: |
Internal Control
System has a positive effect on the budget preparation of Lemdiklat Polri and
its ranks. |
|
H4 |
: |
External factors
moderate the influence of the Internal Control System on budget preparation. |
RESULTS
AND DISCUSSION
The research results are a process of data collection
that has been carried out by researchers in which data processing and research
analysis are carried out systematically and objectively to obtain the results
of hypothesis testing. To get the results of this study, researchers used the
Partial Least Suqare-Structural Equation Model (PLS-SEM) and the following
stages of data processing in SmartPLS 4.0, which consists of Outer Model
Analysis, Inner Model Analysis and Hypothesis Testing.
Evaluation
of Measurement Model (Outer Model)
Evaluation measurement, or what is called the outer
model, is interpreted as a measurement model that can see the relationship
between indicators and other variables. This outer model is a test of validity
and reliability. The outer model test begins with estimating parameters, namely
by calculating the PLS algorithm with the following results.

Figure 1. PLS Algorithm Calculation Output Display
Source: PLS Output
From the analysis output, the measurement model (outer
model) can be evaluated by testing convergent validity, discriminant validity
and reliability.
Convergent Validity Test Results
Convergent validity seeks to verify the validity of each
relationship between indicators and their corresponding constructs or latent
variables. In the measurement model with reflective indicators, convergent
validity is evaluated by examining the correlation between item scores or
component scores and the scores of latent variables or constructs as estimated
by the PLS program. Convergent validity is examined by the outer loadings
value, where an item is said to be valid if it has an outer loadings value> 0.7.
Based on Table 1, it can be seen that the most dominant
indicators contributing to their respective latent constructs are as follows:
1. The best indicator in forming the Human Resources
variable (X1) is X1.4, which has an outer loadings value of 0.945 and is owned
by item X1.4, namely "The Human Resources Involved Have Understood the
Policies and Procedures Related to Budget Preparation."�
2. The best indicator in forming the Information Technology
variable (X2) is X2.3, which has an outer loadings value of 0.900 and is owned
by item X2.3, namely, "I am satisfied with the performance and
functionality of the information technology used in budget preparation."
3. The best indicator in forming the Internal Control System
variable (X3) is X3.3, which has an outer loadings value of 0.956 and is owned
by item X3.3, namely "Increasing control activities can improve
performance."�
4. The best indicator in forming the External Factors (Z)
variable is Z.2, which has an outer loadings value of 0.960 and is owned by
item Z.2, namely "Changes in government regulations and policies require
adjustments in budget preparation."�
5. The best indicator in forming the Budget Preparation
variable (Y) is Y.6, which has an outer loadings value of 0.944 and is owned by
item Y.6, namely, "Budget preparation uses not too many resources but
maximizes."
Table 1. Loading Factor Value Before Reduction
|
Variables |
Item |
Cut Off |
Outer Loadings |
Conclusion |
|
Human
Resources |
X1.1 |
0.7 |
0.485 |
Invalid |
|
|
X1.2 |
0.7 |
0.576 |
Invalid |
|
|
X1.3 |
0.7 |
0.835 |
Valid |
|
|
X1.4 |
0.7 |
0.936 |
Valid |
|
|
X1.5 |
0.7 |
0.925 |
Valid |
|
|
X1.6 |
0.7 |
0.891 |
Valid |
|
|
X1.7 |
0.7 |
0.884 |
Valid |
|
Information
Technology |
X2.1 |
0.7 |
0.585 |
Invalid |
|
|
X2.2 |
0.7 |
0.862 |
Valid |
|
|
X2.3 |
0.7 |
0.878 |
Valid |
|
|
X2.4 |
0.7 |
0.858 |
Valid |
|
|
X2.5 |
0.7 |
0.823 |
Valid |
|
|
X2.6 |
0.7 |
0.695 |
Invalid |
|
Internal
Control System |
X3.1 |
0.7 |
0.915 |
Valid |
|
|
X3.2 |
0.7 |
0.916 |
Valid |
|
|
X3.3 |
0.7 |
0.956 |
Valid |
|
|
X3.4 |
0.7 |
0.932 |
Valid |
|
|
X3.5 |
0.7 |
0.928 |
Valid |
|
External
Factors |
Z.1 |
0.7 |
0.938 |
Valid |
|
|
Z.2 |
0.7 |
0.960 |
Valid |
|
|
Z.3 |
0.7 |
0.822 |
Valid |
|
|
Z.4 |
0.7 |
0.880 |
Valid |
|
|
Z.5 |
0.7 |
0.944 |
Valid |
|
Budget Preparation |
Y.1 |
0.7 |
0.828 |
Valid |
|
|
Y.2 |
0.7 |
0.720 |
Valid |
|
|
Y.3 |
0.7 |
0.832 |
Valid |
|
|
Y.4 |
0.7 |
0.888 |
Valid |
|
|
Y.5 |
0.7 |
0.938 |
Valid |
|
|
Y.6 |
0.7 |
0.942 |
Valid |
Source:
PLS Output Results
Based on the figure and table above, four
items have an outer loading value of less than 0.7, so they must be removed.
After the items are removed or excluded, the data is run again, and the results
are as follows.

Figure 2. PLS Algorithm Calculation Output Display after
Reduction
Source: PLS Output Results
Based on this output, the outer loadings value of each
indicator after reduction can be found in Table 2 below:
Table 2. Loading Factor Value after Reduction
|
Variables |
Item |
Cut Off |
Outer
Loadings |
Conclusion |
|
Human Resources |
X1.3 |
0.7 |
0.854 |
Valid |
|
|
X1.4 |
0.7 |
0.945 |
Valid |
|
|
X1.5 |
0.7 |
0.942 |
Valid |
|
|
X1.6 |
0.7 |
0.903 |
Valid |
|
|
X1.7 |
0.7 |
0.892 |
Valid |
|
Information Technology |
X2.2 |
0.7 |
0.843 |
Valid |
|
|
X2.3 |
0.7 |
0.900 |
Valid |
|
|
X2.4 |
0.7 |
0.885 |
Valid |
|
|
X2.5 |
0.7 |
0.875 |
Valid |
|
Internal Control System |
X3.1 |
0.7 |
0.915 |
Valid |
|
|
X3.2 |
0.7 |
0.916 |
Valid |
|
|
X3.3 |
0.7 |
0.956 |
Valid |
|
|
X3.4 |
0.7 |
0.932 |
Valid |
|
|
X3.5 |
0.7 |
0.928 |
Valid |
|
External Factors |
Z.1 |
0.7 |
0.938 |
Valid |
|
|
Z.2 |
0.7 |
0.960 |
Valid |
|
|
Z.3 |
0.7 |
0.821 |
Valid |
|
|
Z.4 |
0.7 |
0.880 |
Valid |
|
|
Z.5 |
0.7 |
0.944 |
Valid |
|
Budget Preparation |
Y.1 |
0.7 |
0.829 |
Valid |
|
|
Y.2 |
0.7 |
0.715 |
Valid |
|
|
Y.3 |
0.7 |
0.831 |
Valid |
|
|
Y.4 |
0.7 |
0.888 |
Valid |
|
|
Y.5 |
0.7 |
0.939 |
Valid |
|
|
Y.6 |
0.7 |
0.944 |
Valid |
Source: PLS Output Results
Discriminant Validity Test Results
Discriminant validity can be assessed by examining the
AVE value for each construct or latent variable. A model demonstrates stronger
discriminant validity when the square root of the AVE for each construct is
greater than the correlation between any two constructs within the model. The
rule of thumb is said to be valid if the AVE value is more than 0.5. The
variable AVE values in this study are:
Table 3. Loading Factor Value after Reduction
|
Variables |
AVE |
Conclusion |
|
Human Resources |
0.825 |
Valid |
|
Information Technology |
0.768 |
Valid |
|
Internal Control System |
0.864 |
Valid |
|
External Factors |
0.828 |
Valid |
|
Budget Preparation |
0.742 |
Valid |
Source: PLS Output Results
Based on the table, it can be seen that the AVE value for
all variables is more significant than 0.5. Thus, the constructs in this
research model have good discriminant validity.
Reliability Test
Besides assessing validity, the outer model also evaluates
the reliability of the construct or latent variable. This is done by examining
the composite reliability value and Cronbach's alpha of the indicator block
measuring the construct. A construct is considered reliable if the composite
reliability value exceeds 0.7 and the Cronbach's alpha value is above 0.6. The
reliability test results are as follows.
Table 4. Composite Reliability Value
|
Variables |
Composite
Reliability |
Cronbach
Alpha |
Conclusion |
|
Human Resources |
0.953 |
0.947 |
Reliable |
|
Information Technology |
0.903 |
0.899 |
Reliable |
|
Internal Control System |
0.961 |
0.961 |
Reliable |
|
External Factors |
0.993 |
0.950 |
Reliable |
|
Budget Preparation |
0.937 |
0.928 |
Reliable |
Source: PLS Output Results
Test Coefficient of Determination (R-Square)
The R-Square
(R�) value indicates the extent to which exogenous variables explain the
variation in endogenous variables. The greater the R2 value, the better the
level of determination.
Table 5. R-Square
|
Variables |
R2 |
|
Budget Preparation |
0.836 |
The results of the calculation of R2 for each endogenous
latent variable in the table above show a value of 0.836, which means that the
value variable in budget preparation can be explained or influenced by human
resource variables, information technology and internal control systems by
83.6%. Meanwhile, the remaining 16.4% is influenced by other factors outside
the modelling of this study.
Predictive Relevance Test (Q2)
The Q� value assesses how effectively the model generates
observed values and parameter estimates. A Q� value greater than 0 suggests
that the model performs well, and a higher Q� indicates that the model's
predictions are deemed relevant.
Q2 = 1
- (1-R2)
Q2 = 1
- (1-0.836)
Q2 =
0.836
The results of the Q2 calculation above show that the
research model has a Q2 value of 0.836 or 83.6%, where the independent
variables in this study can predict the budget preparation variable. At the
same time, the rest is the contribution of other variables that are not
included in this research model. Based on the calculation with the Q2 equation,
this model also has a very high predictive relevance because the value is
greater than 0 (zero).
Hypothesis Test Results
Hypothesis testing is conducted by examining the
t-statistic value obtained from the bootstrapping process. A hypothesis is
considered accepted (supported) if the t-statistic exceeds 1.96 at a 5%
significance level (two-tailed). The results of the SmartPLS program
bootstrapping process can be seen in Table 6 below:
Table 6. Value of t-statistics
|
Hypothesis |
Influence |
Path Coefficient |
T- Statistics |
P- Value |
Hypothesis Conclusion |
|
H1 |
HR
→ Budgeting |
0.081 |
0.507 |
0.613 |
Rejected |
|
H2 |
Information
technology → budgeting |
0.367 |
3.647 |
0.000 |
Accepted |
|
H3 |
Internal
control system → budgeting |
0.399 |
2.827 |
0.005 |
Accepted |
Source: PLS Output Results
Based
on the test results in Table 6, the effect of each variable is described as
follows:
1. H1: Human Resources has a positive effect on the
preparation of the budget of the Police Training Center and its ranks (DENIED).
This is because the T statistic value is smaller than the T table (1.96), and
the P value is more significant than 0.05 (0.05 < 0.613) with a positive
coefficient value. Human resources have a positive but insignificant effect on
the preparation of the budget of the Police Training Center and its ranks.
2. H2: Information Technology has a positive effect on the
preparation of Lemdiklat Polri's budget and its ranks (ACCEPTED). This is
because the T statistic value is greater than the T table (1.96), and the P
value is less than 0.05 (0.05> 0.000) with a positive coefficient value. So,
information technology has a positive and significant effect on the preparation
of the budget of the Police Training Center and its ranks.
3. H3: The Internal Control System has a positive effect on
the budget preparation of the Polri Training and Training Center and its ranks
(ACCEPTED). This is because the T statistic value is greater than the T table
(1.96), and the P value is less than 0.05 (0.05> 0.005) with a positive
coefficient value. So, the internal control system has a positive and
significant effect on the budget preparation of the National Police Training
Center and its ranks.
Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA) Test Results
To test External Factors as a moderating variable for the
relationship between the internal control system and budget preparation. The
criteria used as a basis for comparison are as follows:
The
hypothesis is rejected if the t-statistic < 1.96 or the p-value> 0.05.
The hypothesis is accepted if the t-statistic > 1.96 or the p-value <
0.05.
Table 6. MRA Results
|
Hypothesis |
Influence |
T - Statistics |
P - Value |
Hypothesis
Conclusion |
|
H4 |
External
factors X internal control system →
budget preparation |
0.107 |
0.915 |
Rejected |
Based on the test results in Table 6, the results of
hypothesis H4: External Factors moderate the influence of the Internal Control System
on Budgeting (DENIED). This is because the t-statistic value is 0.107 <
1.96, and the p-value is 0.915> 0.05. Thus, external factors cannot moderate
the effect of the internal control system on the preparation of the Polri
Lemdiklat budget and its ranks.
The Effect of Human Resources on Budget Preparation
Human Resources is a crucial internal factor that
significantly impacts an organization's success or failure in reaching its
goals, making it essential to manage HR effectively and efficiently (Sholihah et al., 2015). The existence of good-quality human resources will
undoubtedly encourage the achievement of predetermined targets. The results and
testing of the first hypothesis (H1) show that the human resource variable has
a positive but insignificant effect on budget preparation. Human resources have
dominant indicators in budget preparation, such as the expertise of each
employee. However, with an excellent level of respondent achievement, more is
needed to prove that human resources have a significant effect on budget
preparation. This is likely because budget preparation only depends partially
on human resources; there are other resources such as budget resources, information
in the form of data, equipment and technology, and other supporting facilities (Rumenser, 2014). The results of this study are not in line with the
research (Wahyuni et al., 2023), (Ismid et al., 2020), (Lubis & Shara, 2021). However, the results that have no effect are in line
with several previous studies, including those conducted (Kartini, 2019), (Rumenser, 2014).
The Effect of Information Technology on Budgeting
The definition of information technology can vary even
though each definition has the same core (Sabaruddinsah, 2011) information technology is described as a blend of
computer and telecommunications technologies, incorporating hardware, software,
databases, network technology, and other telecommunications equipment. It is
employed to process, acquire, organize, store, and manage data in various forms
to generate relevant, accurate, and timely information for personal, business,
and government purposes. It is strategic information that determines
decision-making (Indrayani, 2012).
The results and testing of the second hypothesis (H2)
show that information technology variables have a positive and significant
effect on Budget Preparation. The effective use of Information Technology can
improve the efficiency of the budgeting process by providing sophisticated
tools for data collection, analysis and reporting. Sophisticated budget
software can provide additional support to estimate and monitor budgets more
effectively. The results of this study are in line with those conducted by (Lubis &
Shara, 2021), who stated that Information Technology affects the
Preparation of Regional Revenue and Expenditure Budgets in Medan City.
Effect of Internal Control System on Budget Preparation
According to (Single, 2013), every activity in implementing the budget has two
levels. The first is the operating system, which is designed to meet
predetermined objectives. The second is a control system designed to ensure
that the objectives of the operating system will be achieved. The existing
components of the government's internal control system are a form of internal
control system components adopted from COSO. According to COSO, five components
of the internal control system are described according to Government Regulation
No. 60 of 2008 concerning internal control systems, namely the control
environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and
communication, and monitoring.
The results and testing of the third hypothesis (H3) show
that the internal control system variable has a positive and significant effect
on Budget Preparation. A robust Internal Control System plays a vital role in
ensuring that the budget preparation process runs in accordance with applicable
policies and procedures. This helps reduce the risk of error and abuse and
improves compliance with established standards. Thus, budgeting can be improved
overall, allowing organizations to make better and more sustainable decisions.
The results of this study are in line with previous research (Suryani & Pujiono,
2020).
External Factors moderate the influence of the Internal Control System on
Budget Preparation.
The external environment is an environmental condition
that is outside the control of the organization and has a significant effect on
strategic plans and operational plans so that it directly or indirectly affects
the quality of output; in this case, what is meant is financial statements (Kolit et al., 2023). The internal control system covers many aspects of the
internal management of an organization or company. Internal control is a
framework consisting of procedures that are interrelated in carrying out a
habit within the company to control the running of the company, which includes
and secures assets, checks the accuracy and correctness of administration or
accounting, promotes efficiency in operations and helps maintain company
policies to be obeyed (Supit, 2015).
The results and testing of the fourth hypothesis (H4)
show that in this study, the External Factors variable does not moderate the
influence of the Internal Control System on Budget Preparation. This is likely
because implementing a change usually cannot be done quickly but through
bureaucracy first and through several stages, such as waiting for the Ministry
/ Institution Work and Budget Plan (RKA) revision process in the current fiscal
year or having to wait for the preparation of a needs plan in the next fiscal
year. Budget preparation documents sometimes change when a leadership
instruction is issued.
External factors in this study are Application updates,
Regulatory changes, Geopolitical changes, Pandemics and Inflation rates.
External factors themselves can be a threat to the internal control system that
affects budgeting, such as a lack of risk management against geopolitical
changes or rising inflation if you have good risk management in the internal
control system. Then, the budget preparation document can be easily adjusted if
external factors arise. The results of this study are not in line with previous
research (Yendrawati, 2013). However, the results that have no effect are in line
with research (Untary & Ardiyanto,
2015).
CONCLUSION
This research was
conducted to determine whether human resources, information technology, and
internal control systems influence budget preparation with external factors as
moderating variables. Data was obtained from planning staff at Lemdiklat Polri
and its jurisdictions (Lemdiklat Polri, 34 SPNs, and 15 Pusdik Schools). This
study aims to test the effect of Human Resources on Budget Preparation, the
effect of Information Technology on Budget Preparation, the effect of the
Internal Control System on Budget Preparation, and whether External Factors
moderate the effect of the Internal Control System on Budget Preparation. Based
on the results of test analysis and research with the SmartPLS 4.0 program that
has been carried out in the previous chapter, the following conclusions can be
obtained: (1) Human Resources have no effect on Budget Preparation, (2)
Information Technology affects Budget Preparation, (3) Internal Control System
affects Budget Preparation, and (4) External Factors do not moderate the effect
of the Internal Control System on Budget Preparation. The results of this study
provide implications for Lemdiklat Polri and its ranks that need to optimize
the importance of Information Technology. Effective use of information
technology can improve the efficiency of the budget preparation process by
providing sophisticated tools for data collection, analysis and reporting.
Sophisticated budget software can provide additional support to forecast and
monitor budgets more effectively. The results of this study also provide
implications for the National Police Training Agency and its ranks that need to
optimize the importance of the Internal Control System. A robust internal
control system plays a vital role in ensuring that the budget preparation
process is in accordance with applicable policies and procedures. This helps to
reduce the risk of error and abuse and improve compliance with established
standards. As such, budgeting can be improved overall, enabling the
organization to make better and more sustainable decisions.
REFERENCES
Amin, M. (2013). Pengaruh Informasi
Eksternal Terhadap Penyusunan Anggaran Pada Perusahaan Finance Di Pekanbaru.
Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau.
Anggeadi, I. B., Diatmika, I. P. G.,
& Sujana, E. (2023). Pengaruh Kualitas Sumber Daya Manusia, Sistem
Pengendalian Internal Dan Sistem Anggaran Berbasis Kinerja Terhadap Penyerapan
Anggaran DIPA Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha. JIMAT (Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa
Akuntansi) Undiksha, 14(04), 920�933.
Dwiyanthi, H. (2022). Pengaruh Biaya
Ekuitas, Pertumbuhan Aset, Kebijakan Dividen, Dan Tingkat Inflasi Terhadap
Nilai Perusahaan Dengan Tata Kelola Teknologi Informasi Sebagai Variabel
Moderating (Studi Kasus Pada Perusahaan Sektor Pertambangan yang Terdaftar di
Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2016-2020). Nusa Putra.
Indrayani, H. (2012). Penerapan
teknologi informasi dalam peningkatan efektivitas, efisiensi dan produktivitas
perusahaan. Jurnal El-Riyasah, 3(1), 48�56.
Ismid, F., Kusmanto, H., & Lubis, M.
(2020). Analisis Faktor�Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penyusunan Anggaran Pendapatan
dan Belanja Daerah Berbasis Kinerja Pada Pemerintah Kabupaten Aceh Singkil. Strukturasi:
Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Administrasi Publik, 2(2), 129�140.
Kartini, R. (2019). Faktor-Faktor
Yang Mempengaruhi Penyusunan Anggaran Pendapatan Dan Belanja Daerah Berbasis
Kinerja (Studi Empiris di Pemerintah Kabupaten Barito Kuala). STIE
Indonesia Banjarmasin.
Kolit, Y. A. D. D., Wahidahwati, W.,
& Mildawati, T. (2023). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kualitas Laporan
Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah Yang Dimoderasi Lingkungan Eksternal. Owner: Riset Dan Jurnal Akuntansi, 7(3), 2072�2082.
Lubis, I. T., & Shara, Y. (2021). Analisis Pengaruh
Kompetensi Sumber Daya Manusia, Transparansi Dan Pemanfaatan Teknologi
Informasi Terhadap Penyusunan Anggaran Pendapatan Dan Belanja Daerah Di Kota
Medan. Jurnal Ilmiah Simantek, 5(3), 144�153.
Manik, L. F., & Sari, E. N. (2022). Pengaruh Kompetensi,
Akuntabilitas Terhadap Penyusunan Anggaran Dengan Komitmen Organisasi Sebagai
Variabel Moderating Pada SMA Swasta Bagian Medan Utara. JRAK (Jurnal Riset
Akuntansi Dan Bisnis), 8(2), 19�29.
Proverra, T. (2003). Pengaruh Informasi Eksternal terhadap
Penyusunan Anggaran Perusahaan di Sumatra Barat. Universitas Bung Hatta.
Rumenser, P. (2014). Pengaruh komitmen, kualitas sumber daya
manusia, gaya kepemimpinan terhadap kemampuan penyusunan anggaran pada
pemerintah Kota Manado. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Auditing"
Goodwill", 5(2).
Sholihah, R. A., Rosidi, R., & Purnomosidhi, B. (2015).
Pengaruh Kualitas Sumber Daya Manusia Dan Komitmen Tujuan Terhadap Implementasi
Anggaran Berbasis Kinerja Dengan Budaya Organisasi Sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi
(Studi Pada�. EL DINAR: Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan Syariah, 3(1),
41�81.
Supit, M. (2015). Prakteksistem Pengendalian Intern
Terhadap Kredit Macet Pada PT. Bank BTPN KCP Tomohon TBK. Politeknik Negeri
Manado.
Suryani, F., & Pujiono, P. (2020). Pengaruh Partisipasi
Anggaran, Kejelasan Sasaran Anggaran, Desentralisasi, dan Akuntabilitas Publik
terhadap Kinerja Manajerial. Journal of Economic, Bussines and Accounting
(COSTING), 4(1), 167�181.
Suyanto, S. (2012). Dasar-dasar
Pendidikan Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Hikayat Publishing.
Syamsuddin, S. (2022). Pengaruh Komitmen
Organisasi, Penyempurnaan Sistem Administrasi, dan Sumber Daya Manusia terhadap
Penyusunan Anggaran Berbasis Kinerja Dinas Pendidikan di Kabupaten Pohuwato. YUME: Journal of Management, 5(3), 139�147.
Tunggal, A. (2013). Peran DPRD Dalam Pengawasan Terhadap
Pelaksanaan Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah Di Kabupaten Sleman.
UAJY.
Untary, N. R., & Ardiyanto, M. D. (2015). Pengaruh
sistem informasi akuntansi, sistem pengendalian intern dan kompetensi sumber
daya manusia terhadap kualitas laporan keuangan Daerah dengan faktor eksternal
sebagai pemoderasi (studi kasus pada Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Magelang).
Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis.
Wahyuni, S., Maryadi, M., & Sjarlis, S. (2023). Pengaruh
Komitmen, Kualitas Sumber Daya Manusia Dan Gaya Kepemimpinan Terhadap Kemampuan
Penyusunan Anggaran Pada Dinas Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Pemerintah Kabupaten
Bantaeng. The Manusagre Journal, 1(4), 574�582.
Yendrawati, R. (2013). Pengaruh sistem pengendalian intern
dan kapasitas sumber daya manusia terhadap kualitas informasi laporan keuangan
dengan faktor eksternal sebagai variabel moderating. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan
Auditing Indonesia, 17(2), 166�175.
Yunita, E. N., & Sabaruddinsah, F. E. (2011). Pengaruh
Partisipasi Anggaran dan Teknologi Informasi terhadap Kinerja Manajerial (Studi
Empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur di Bogor). JRAK: Jurnal Riset Akuntansi
& Komputerisasi Akuntansi, 2(01), 4457.
|
� 2024 by
the authors. It was submitted for possible open-access publication under the
terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY SA) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). |