Corresponding Author: Gadang Wardono
E-mail: [email protected]
INTRODUCTION
The
company is the place for produce something goods gana
produce decent product _ sell in the middle competition rampant business . _
Amount competition business enough make complexity (Sembiring & Trisnawati, 2019) in the corporate
world . Then , every company must could maintain or increase quality .
Enhancement quality of course relate with source power man (Scientific, 2019) which
he has , because they will give performance for the company they follow .
Performance
is description on implementation something activity or work program based on
with applicable policy _ for reach target or desired goal _ as vision and
mission something organization company (Kartikawaty et al., 2021) .
This
thing due to , impact from something performance relate with quality product
produced in a _ company including the cement industry in the Bogor area. So
from that , source power man must developed with good because is one _
important element _ in increase quality company (Ariana & Mujiati, 2018) .
So
from that , company must capable increase quality employees . However , the
challenge no easy reverse palm hand . This thing because , quality source power
man relate with level intellectual , social and emotional employees . one _
quite a challenge intensive is will employee for involved in various affairs
company with the commitment they have .
Employees
who do n't have commitment so goods of course no will
have good employee engagement also has desire for leave company so that
if company experience deficiency personnel will caused bad to progress
something organization or company .
With
employee engagement then the employees will have a sense of
responsibility answer and have to the company he Use for work so that attitude
for work more from the job description will used to he do with happy and
without pressure from anybody so that goals and objectives company could
achieved (Ulfa & Mulyana, 2019) .
Employee
engagement enough take effect to progress organization
because he related with variety related value _ with interaction Among one
person with another in a company and consider that level the performance he
have is important thing _ for herself alone .
If
employee engagement formed so Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB)
can implemented . Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) is a form
behavior employees with _ happy heart To do profession more from what be _ not
quite enough the answer is , so the time that he Use for work have high
effectiveness and efficiency , because _ employee always involve self in
variety job .
Sustainability
something company depend how they have strength for build return the company
through fun and exciting atmosphere _ satisfaction (Thufailah & Abdurrahman, 2020) .
Moreover , when this has is at in the digitization zone or called as revolution
where is industry 4.0 ? company must capable create success through technology (Mukti & Puspitadewi, nd) so
that capable compete in the realm International (Ansari et al., 2018) ,
even capable beat its competitors with easy (Mukti & Puspitadewi, nd) .
The
corporate world is very competitive , then investation
best is at source power the human he has so that capable maintain variety the
advantages of having company for compete . Employees who haven't invested with
ok , they will have low feeling _ spirit in work and create desire for go out
from company or what is called as turnover
intention (Budiyono & Haryati, 2016) .
Climate
organization is important thing _ for create atmosphere comfortable , safe and
happy in a company so that employees feel happy and peaceful in doing variety
her job . Climate organization can also be interpreted as corner look every
member about variety things that exist and occur in the internal environment of
a organization company .
Besides
that , climate organization can also used for knowing
is somebody To do his job in accordance with not quite enough responsibilities
and procedures that have been determined or jutsu no
capable To do his job with good (Ukkas & Latif, 2017)� so that no accepted by members another
organization .
Need
is known that every company have climate different organizations , because _
leader different so style leadership is different so that the climate formed no
can equated Among one company with company other . There is a number of
dimensions in climate organization that is trust , manufacture decision with
the support of employees dlama every level , honesty
, communication , flexibility , and risk profession (Ukkas & Latif, 2017) .
Climate
organization This is also formed in the cement industry in Bogor district ,
where they move to production substance used _ for gluing stones, bricks ,
bricks , ceramics or ingredient building other for built so appearance .
Based
on results observations in the Bogor Regency cement industry accompanied by
with Focus Group Discussion (FGD) is known that many employees who feel feel at home work in Industry the so that they feel
comfortable and willing work more active and more good again even beyond their
job description _ have . state this of course different with cement industry or
company other . because of that , researcher want to knowing more carry on
about�� influence Organizational
Climate on OCB and Employee Engagement with studies case / place :
Employee Cement Industry in Bogor Regency . Destination from research this that
is for knowing level influence Organizational Climate ( Climate
Organization ) with OCB and employee engagement so that could made as
ingredient reference for manage company for cement industry or industry others
can also made as base analysis for increase repair for the cement industry in
Bogor Regency alone .
With increase quality cement industry then expected
more and more products are issued quality for create sturdy and suitable
building _ with the dreams of consumers are also ready compete in the realm
national or International . Progress the cement industry can also give
influence enough good for countries like increase well-being people through
vacancy open job _ wide . For that , research this important for conducted so
that OCB and employee engagement could Keep going improved .
METHOD
Study this use method
studies empirical where study this conducted based on the evidence obtained by real
that is through information obtained _ moment To do observation or experiment
shape climate desired organization . _ Respondent in research this there are 40
people and they are chosen based on the purpose of sampling that is customized
with destination research To use knowing influence climate organization on OCB
and employee engagement . Besides use studies empirical , data
acquisition is also carried out through technique Focus Group Discussion (FGD)
or discussion group .
FGD method is
sufficient often used for To do research in the field of social , data
acquisition is done through the process of interaction Among one respondent
with other respondents based on results discussion carried out with focus on
the discussion problem research .
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Data Normality Test
Before results and discussion study this be delivered more go on ,
then will conducted more formerly normality test To use knowing score
distribution of data on the cement industry .
Table 1
Data
Normality Test
|
One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
|
|
|
|
X1
|
X2
|
X3
|
|
N
|
40
|
40
|
40
|
|
Normal Parameters a ,, b
|
mean
|
70.4000
|
83.1000
|
88,8250
|
|
Std. Deviation
|
7.41724
|
7.38953
|
6.65597
|
|
Most Extreme Differences
|
Absolute
|
.232
|
.188
|
.167
|
|
Positive
|
.192
|
.188
|
.167
|
|
negative
|
-.232
|
-.150
|
-148
|
|
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
|
1,470
|
1.186
|
1.058
|
|
Asymp . Sig. (2-tailed)
|
.027
|
.120
|
.213
|
|
a. Test distribution is Normal.
|
|
b. Calculated from data.
|
The data explain that whole
variable both X 1 , X 2 and X 3 has normally
distributed , because Asymp.Sig . (2-tailed
)>0.01. If summed up , then will generate the following data this :
Table 2
Summary of
Data Normality Test
|
|
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
|
Asymp . Sig. (2-tailed)
|
|
X1
|
1,470
|
.027
|
|
X2
|
1.186
|
.120
|
|
X3
|
1.186
|
.213
|
Actually
, with amount respondent 40 no bullet using the normality test , because
distribution on sampling error item has close to normal. However , in
research this permanent conducted as one _ proof empirical that research this
has normally distributed to whole respondents .
1. Significance
Test Coefficient Correlation
Based
on FGD results are known that OCB and employee engagement in the cement
industry in Bogor Regency have walk with 75% percentage . with this is known
that majority employee has agree that OCB and employee engagement has
done with good . They also stated that climate organization influence level
second variable the because however they is a
employee where performance customized with climate from company that . For
knowing more go on , then carried out a significance test coefficient
correlation To use test is relationship that happened that apply for whole
population or only on certain people .
Table 3
Significance Test Results Coefficient Correlation
|
Correlations
|
|
|
|
X1
|
X2
|
X3
|
|
X1
|
Pearson Correlation
|
1
|
.774 **
|
.720 **
|
|
Sig. (2-tailed)
|
|
.000
|
.000
|
|
N
|
40
|
40
|
40
|
|
X2
|
Pearson Correlation
|
.774 **
|
1
|
.962 **
|
|
Sig. (2-tailed)
|
.000
|
|
.000
|
|
N
|
40
|
40
|
40
|
|
X3
|
Pearson Correlation
|
.720 **
|
.962 **
|
1
|
|
Sig. (2-tailed)
|
.000
|
.000
|
|
|
N
|
40
|
40
|
40
|
|
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
|
Based on
these data is known that sig.(2- tailed) <
0.01 then the data has significant , meaning relationship that happened no only
pda scale minority but on a scale population cement industry
in Bogor Regency .
This thing as
Where are the FGD results ? they by compact state that existence climate
organization that causes increase in OCB and employee engagement has
implemented by the majority employee no by partial . because employees in the
Bogor Regency cement industry have set so appearance so that have a sense of
kinship , a sense of belonging and mutual understand the meaning of not quite
enough responsibility borne by each employee . However , in Thing this they no
Act selfish , when his job already done so he will complete another job so that
the time he has no wasted in vain .
Significance Test Regression
Based on spread questionnaire get data as following :
Table 4
Influence
Climate Organization on OCB and Employee Engagement through
Questionnaire and FGD
|
No
|
Statement
|
Percentage
|
Information
|
|
1
|
Difference
climate organization impact on OCB culture in the environment company
|
89%
|
Very
Influential
|
|
2
|
OCB
and employee engagement have mutual relationship _ related
|
76%
|
Very
Influential
|
|
3
|
Climate
organization could affect OCB and employee engagement
|
85%
|
Very
Influential
|
|
4
|
If
the climate organization bad then OCB and employee engagement are also
bad even company could experience roll mat
|
78%
|
Very
Influential
|
����� data is also
corroborated with significance test results regression as following :
a.
Variable X 2 top X 1
Significance test results regression on variable X 2
top X 1 is as following :
Table 5
Significance
Test Results regression on variable X 2 top X 1
|
ANOVA b
|
|
Model
|
Sum of Squares
|
df
|
Mean Square
|
F
|
Sig.
|
|
1
|
Regression
|
1277,195
|
1
|
1277,195
|
56,937
|
.000 a
|
|
Residual
|
852.405
|
38
|
22,432
|
|
|
|
Total
|
2129,600
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
a. Predictors: (Constant), X1
|
|
b. Dependent Variable: X2
|
�����
Based on these data is known that Sig value =
0.000 < 0.01 then regression variable X 2 top X 1 is
significant or Climate Organization have significant influence _ to Organizational
Citizenship Behavior (OCB).
b.
Variable X 3 top X 1
Significance test results regression on the variable X 3
over X 1 is as following :
Table 6
Significance
test results regression on the variable X 3 top X 1
|
ANOVA b
|
|
Model
|
Sum of Squares
|
df
|
Mean Square
|
F
|
Sig.
|
|
1
|
Regression
|
896,353
|
1
|
896,353
|
40,968
|
.000 a
|
|
Residual
|
831,422
|
38
|
21,880
|
|
|
|
Total
|
1727,775
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
a. Predictors: (Constant), X1
|
|
b. Dependent Variable: X3
|
The data
state that score Sig .=0.000<0.01 then regression variable X 3
above X 1 is significant or Climate Organization have significant
influence _ to Employee Engagement .
Linearity Test regression
Test this
addressed for know existence connection between
variable by significant or no . Based on FGD results and dissemination questionnaire
is known that 75% of respondents state there is connection significant Among
climate organization ( Organizational Climate) with OCB and employee
engagement . It can also _ proven with linearity
test results regression following this :
a.
Variable X 2 top X 1
Linearity test results regression variable X 2 over X 1
is as following :
Table 7
Linearity
test results regression variable X 2 top X 1
|
ANOVA Table
|
|
|
|
|
Sum of Squares
|
df
|
Mean Square
|
F
|
Sig.
|
|
X2*X1
|
Between Groups
|
(Combined)
|
1387,204
|
4
|
346,801
|
16,350
|
.000
|
|
linearity
|
1277,195
|
1
|
1277,195
|
60,213
|
.000
|
|
Deviation from Linearity
|
110,0009
|
3
|
36,670
|
1,729
|
.179
|
|
Within Groups
|
742,396
|
35
|
21,211
|
|
|
|
Total
|
2129,600
|
39
|
|
|
|
����� Based on the above data
is known that score Sig. (Deviation from Linearity) = 0.179> 0.01
then concluded that regression variable X 2 above X 1 is
linear regression .
b.
Variable X 3 top X 1
Linearity Test Results regression variable X 3 over X 1
are as follows :
Table 8
Linearity Test
Results Regression variable X 3 top X 1
|
ANOVA Table
|
|
|
|
|
Sum of Squares
|
df
|
Mean Square
|
F
|
Sig.
|
|
X3*X1
|
Between Groups
|
(Combined)
|
946,191
|
4
|
236,548
|
10,593
|
.000
|
|
linearity
|
896,353
|
1
|
896,353
|
40139
|
.000
|
|
Deviation from Linearity
|
49,838
|
3
|
16,613
|
.744
|
.533
|
|
Within Groups
|
781,584
|
35
|
22,331
|
|
|
|
Total
|
1727,775
|
39
|
|
|
|
Based on the
data above is known that Sig. (Deviation from Linearity) = 0.533>0.01
then concluded that regression variable X 3 over X 1 is
linear regression
The result
will also tested with significance test coefficient track To use knowing
coefficient direction based on empirical data or data obtained by real through
supporting evidence _
2. Significance
test coefficient track
Calculation result coefficient track could seen
in the following data this :
����� P 21
����� P 31
Figure
2: Path Diagram
The method of testing the path coefficient in this
research uses SPSS with two stages, namely the first , the step of
calculating the path coefficient, and the second stage of testing the
hypothesis and making conclusions.
a.
Counting significance Path coefficient
At stage this refers to the following data this
Model 1
Table 9
Regression
Test variable X 2 top X 1
|
Model Summary
|
|
Model
|
R
|
R Square
|
Adjusted R Square
|
Std. Error of the Estimate
|
|
1
|
.774 a
|
.600
|
.589
|
4.73621
|
|
a. Predictors: (Constant), X1
|
Table 10
Regression test coefficient variable X 2 top X 1
|
Coefficients a
|
|
Model
|
Unstandardized Coefficients
|
Standardized Coefficients
|
t
|
Sig.
|
|
B
|
Std. Error
|
Beta
|
|
1
|
(Constant)
|
28,784
|
7.237
|
|
3.977
|
.000
|
|
X1
|
.772
|
.102
|
.774
|
7.546
|
.000
|
|
a. Dependent Variable: X2
|
Model 2
Table 11
Regression
Test variable X 3 top X 1
|
Model Summary
|
|
Model
|
R
|
R Square
|
Adjusted R Square
|
Std. Error of the Estimate
|
|
1
|
.720 a
|
.519
|
.506
|
4.67756
|
|
a. Predictors: (Constant), X1
|
Table 12
Regression test coefficient variable X 3 top X 1
|
Coefficients a
|
|
Model
|
Unstandardized Coefficients
|
Standardized Coefficients
|
T
|
Sig.
|
|
B
|
Std. Error
|
Beta
|
|
1
|
(Constant)
|
43,322
|
7.148
|
|
6.061
|
.000
|
|
X1
|
.646
|
.101
|
.720
|
6,401
|
.000
|
|
a. Dependent Variable: X3
|
Based
on the data of the 2 models above is known that score significance of X 2 =
0.00 and X 3 = 0.00 means more small of
0.05. This thing give conclusion that on regression the� that is variable X 1 have
influence to variables X 2 and X 3 . In model 1 it is
known that influence X 1 against X 2 of 0.774 which shows
that influence X 1 against X 2 of 77.4% while the rest ie 22.6% is influenced by other variables that do not
entered into the research . Temporary that for P value 21 can is
known with the formula P 21 = ( 1 - 0.774)=
0.475.
Whereas
for coefficient model 2 path is known that influence X 1 against X 3
of 0.720 which means influence X 1 against X 3 by 72%
while the rest by 28% influenced by other variables that do not entered to in
study this . Temporary that for P value 31 could known
with the formula P 31 = ( 1 - 0.720)= 0.530.
With
thereby could depicted as following :
����� 0.475
����� 0.530
��������������� Figure 3: Significance Results
Path Coefficient
b. Hypothesis
Test and make conclusion
Based on that data so is known that if score p value 21 >
0.05 and P value 31 > 0.05 H 0 rejected and H1
accepted . That is , Organizational Climate has influence positive
to OCB and Employee Engagement.
With thereby could concluded that Organizational Climate has
influence significant positive _ on OCB and employee engagement in the
Cement Industry in Bogor Regency .
CONCLUSION
Based on results the discussion above so
could is known that Organizational Climate have influence positive to Organizational
Citizenship Behavior (OCB) and Employee Engagement . So that company
must have attention special to climate organization built _ so that employees
could feel safe , comfortable and happy in work that has an impact on
commitment volunteer employee for work more from duties and functions as well
as he always want to involved by active in increase quality cement production
in the cement industry of Bogor regency .
Through the conclusion above , then
researcher want to give some advice to whole company whether engaged in the
cement industry or others _ for capable develop climate good organization _ so
that OCB and employee engagement in managed companies could increase and
have an impact on increasing sales volume company . Besides that , research
this can also used as base thoughts and considerations
for readers and researchers _ for To do study next
REFERENCES
Ansari, F., Erol, S., & Sihn, W. (2018). Rethinking
human-machine learning in industry 4.0: how does the paradigm shift treat the
role of human learning? Procedia Manufacturing , 23 , 117�122.
Ariana, IGR, & Mujiati, NW (2018). The Effect of Job
Involvement, Organizational Climate, and Job Satisfaction on Organizational
Commitment. E-Journal of Management , 7 (10), 5314�5342.
Budiyono, R., & Haryati, T. (2016). Analysis of the
Effect of Job Satisfaction, Job Stress, and Organizational Commitment on
Turnover Intention (Study at Pt. Duta Service Semarang). Journal of STIE
Semarang , 8 (1), 37�53.
Scientific, AA (2019). The Role of Organizational Citizenship
Behavior (OCB) and Organizational Culture in Improving Employee Performance at
UKM Snak Makroni Cap Bintang, Mutih Wetan Village, Demak Regency. BUSINESS:
Journal of Islamic Business and Management , 6 (2), 17�29.
Kartikawaty, E., Yustini, T., & Zamzam, F. (2021). The
effect of work discipline, compensation, and the covid 19 pandemic on the
productivity of PT. Beautiful Palembang Radiant Bread. Journal of
Professional Management Integrity (IJMPRO) , 2 (2), 277�290.
Mukti, JN, & Puspitadewi, NWS (nd). RELATIONSHIP
BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATE AND ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR (OCB) IN
EMPLOYEES OF PT. X .
Sembiring, S., & Trisnawati, I. (2019). Factors Affecting
Company Value. Journal of Business And Accounting , 21 (1a-2),
173�184.
Thufailah, DQ, & Abdurrahman, D. (2020). The influence of
Employee Engagement on Organizational Citizenship Behavior and its impact on
Turnover Intention on employees of PT. PLN Pusharlis (Persero). Management
Proceedings , 6 (2), 1039�1049.
Ukkas, I., & Latif, D. (2017). The effect of
organizational climate and organizational commitment on organizational
citizenship behavior (OCB). Equilibrium: Scientific Journal of Economics,
Management and Accounting , 6 (1).
Ulfa, C., & Mulyana, OP (2019). The relationship between
organizational climate and employee morale. Character: Journal of
Psychological Research. , 6 (3).
