Authority of Taping as A Tool of Evidence in Criminal Acts of Corruption in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v1i11.135Keywords:
Wiretapping, Corruption, CrimeAbstract
Introduction: On the side of corruption crime, law enforcers are given special rights to obtain and access electronic information to strengthen evidence of corruption cases. The range of wiretapping on privacy related to human rights and its importance as electronic evidence in criminal acts of corruption, the purpose of this study is to examine wiretapping as evidence in criminal acts of corruption in Indonesia without violating constitutional rights. Methods: This research method uses normative jurisprudence with secondary data sources obtained through library research, including primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials, both in the form of documents and regulations relating to wiretapping on corruption. At the same time, the data analysis technique used descriptive qualitative. Result: The principle of wiretapping is the legal basis of Law Number 19 of 2019; the law further explains legal certainty regarding granting permits to the Supervisory Board so that the KPK leadership can take immediate action. However, giving special keys to the apparatus must be balanced with caution to avoid misusing. Because the privileges granted intersect with the personal rights of every community, it is prone to human rights violations if it exceeds the limit / outside the problem of corruption. Conclusion: Law enforcement action against corruption gives special powers to law enforcers to obtain and use electronic information. The range of wiretapping on privacy related to human rights and the importance of such information as evidence of corruption must consider the applicable laws without violating constitutional rights.
References
Asikin, Z. (2004). Amirudin. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Awaluddin, I., & Mukaddimah, A. (n.d.). Korupsi Sebagai Permasalahan Teologis.
Azhar, A. (2018). Upaya Pemberantasan Korupsi Seiring Kemajuan Teknologi Informasi. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 5(4), 12–18.
Eddyono, S. W. (2014). Mengurai Pengaturan Penyadapan dalam Rancangan KUHAP. Teropong, 22.
Fachrunisa, S. (2021). Penyadapan sebagai Bentuk Upaya Paksa dalam Hukum Acara Pidana di Indonesia. Jurnal Studi Hukum Pidana, 1, 37–50.
Fitria, R. A. (2017). Penyadapan Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Tindak Pidana Umum Berdasarkan Hukum Acara Pidana. Mimbar Keadilan, 160–182.
Hertanto, H. (2020). Penyidikan dan Penuntutan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Masyarakat Pemantau Peradilan Indonesia, Jakarta.
Indonesia, Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik. (2020). Penyidik KPK Nilai Izin Dewan Pengawas Hmabat Proses Penegakan Hukum. https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=16203
Indonesia, Makmahamah Konstitusi Republik. (2020). Kewenangan Penyadapan KPK Harus Dilakukan Hati-Hati. https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=16203
Natamiharja, R., Sabatira, F., Banjarani, D. R., Davey, O. M., & Setiawan, I. (2022). Balancing Two Conflicting Perspectives on Wiretapping Act: Rights to Privacy and Law Enforcement. Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 22(1), 18–30.
Rachmad, A. (2016). Legalitas Penyadapan Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 11(2), 239–249.
Savitri, A. (2019). Revolusi industri 4.0: mengubah tantangan menjadi peluang di era disrupsi 4.0. Penerbit Genesis.
Soekanto, S. (2007). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat.
Soemitro, R. H. (1994). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri, Cetakan Kelima, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.
Utami, A. D. (2020). Peran Alat Bukti Penyadapan Dalam Percepatan Pemberantasan Korupsi. Ensiklopedia of Journal, 3(1), 131–139.
Waluyo, B. (2022). Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Strategi dan Optimalisasi. Sinar Grafika.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of World Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
