The Urgency of the Asset Confiscation Law in on Effort to Restore State Losses Due to Corruption

Authors

  • Mela Agustina Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati, Cirebon
  • Nurfadilah Dwinanda Pertiwi Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati, Cirebon
  • Angelica Angelica Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati, Cirebon
  • Waluyadi Waluyadi Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati, Cirebon
  • Ari Nurhaqi Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati, Cirebon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v4i5.1409

Keywords:

asset forfeiture, loss restoration, corruption laws

Abstract

Corruption in Indonesia continues to cause significant state financial losses and erode public trust in governance. Traditional criminal sanctions such as imprisonment and fines have proven insufficient to deter corrupt actors, particularly due to the absence of a clear legal framework allowing asset confiscation without requiring a criminal conviction. This study examines the urgency of ratifying the Asset Forfeiture Law as a strategic tool to recover state losses resulting from corruption crimes. Employing a normative juridical approach, the study analyzes relevant laws, literature, and documentation using qualitative and prescriptive methods. Findings reveal that the Asset Forfeiture Law, through its in rem-based asset confiscation mechanism, addresses critical gaps by enabling the state to seize assets suspected of being derived from criminal acts regardless of the perpetrator’s criminal conviction. This progressive legal reform not only enhances law enforcement effectiveness but also reinforces social justice by preventing corrupt individuals from benefiting from illicit gains. The study underscores the need for coherent, comprehensive regulations aligned with international standards, facilitating more efficient asset recovery and strengthening public confidence in the legal system. The implications highlight the Asset Forfeiture Law’s role in advancing Indonesia’s anti- corruption framework and promoting good governance.

References

Agustine, O. V. (2019). RUU perampasan aset sebagai peluang dan tantangan dalam pemberantasan korupsi di Indonesia. Hukum Pidana Dan Pembangunan Hukum, 1(2).

Anggraini, N. S. (2024). Rancangan Undang-Undang (RUU) Perampasan Aset: Impian atau solusi? Journal of Social Science Research, 3772–3783.

Dimant, E., & Tosato, G. (2018). Causes and effects of corruption: what has past decade’s empirical research taught us? A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 32(2), 335–356.

Divania, C. N. (2023). Analisis perkembangan kasus korupsi dan peran Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi dalam pemberantasan kasus korupsi di Indonesia serta studi kasus Firli Bahuri. Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Sosial, Dan Humaniora.

Faridzi, M. A., & Nachrawi, G. (2022). Kualifikasi kejahatan luar biasa terhadap tindak pidana korupsi (Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 301 K/Pid.Sus/2021). Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 6(2).

Ferdian, R. B. (2018). Penetapan kerugian negara dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi. Syiah Kuala Law Journal.

Fernanda, A. (2023). Korupsi dan pembangunan berkelanjutan: Evaluasi terhadap dampak korupsi terhadap pembangunan ekonomi, sosial dan lingkungan. Gudang Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu.

Fisman, R., & Golden, M. A. (2017). Corruption: What Everyone Needs to Know®. Oxford University Press.

Hafid, I. (2021). Perampasan aset tanpa pemidanaan dalam perspektif economic analysis of law. Lex Renaissance.

Hidayat, T. A. (2023). Reformasi pemidanaan bagi pelaku tindak pidana korupsi dalam perspektif absolute theory di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8329976

Ilahi, A. H. (2021). The optimization of corruption deterrence during the COVID-19 pandemic. PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law), 71–91.

Jannah, L. M., Sipahutar, M. Y., & Hariyati, D. (2020). Public information disclosure: Mapping the understanding of multiple actors in corruption-prone Indonesian provinces. Policy & Governance Review, 4(3), 167.

Leasa, E. Z. (2020). Eksistensi ancaman pidana mati dalam tindak pidana korupsi pada masa pandemik COVID-19. Jurnal Belo, 73–88.

Listiowati, E. (2023). Engaging patients for patient safety: A qualitative study on healthcare recipients’ perspectives. Indonesian Journal of Health Administration, 67–80.

Olken, B. A., & Pande, R. (2012). Corruption in developing countries. Annu. Rev. Econ., 4(1), 479–509.

Pratiwi, B. A. (2023). Partner’s role in breastfeeding continuity: A systematic review of qualitative study. Amerta Nutrition, 336–343.

Sanjaya, L. L. (2023). Genetic relationship analysis of chrysanthemum genotypes based on quantitative and qualitative characters. Sains Malaysiana, 2175–2190.

Simatupang, D. P. (2022). Keuangan negara dan kerugian negara: Perspektif fenomenologi dan rekonsiliasi hukum. Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia.

Suriyadinata, A. P. S. (2023). Kedudukan dan kewenangan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi dalam pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi ditinjau dari perspektif hukum ketatanegaraan. Riset Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia.

Syarafi, T. (2024). Confiscation of corruption asset in the Indonesian legal system: A study of criminal law in Aceh. Samarah, 665–686.

Trinchera, T. (2020). Confiscation and asset recovery: Better tools to fight bribery and corruption crime. Criminal Law Forum, 49–79.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-31

How to Cite

Agustina, M., Pertiwi, N. D. ., Angelica, A., Waluyadi, W., & Nurhaqi, A. . (2025). The Urgency of the Asset Confiscation Law in on Effort to Restore State Losses Due to Corruption. Journal of World Science, 4(5), 490–502. https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v4i5.1409