Due Process of Law in Verification and Validation of Electronic Evidence on The Use of Fake Motor Vehicle Registration Numbers in The Enforcement of Etilang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v4i7.1467Keywords:
Verification, Validation, Fake TNKB, Electronic Evidence, Legal Certainty, E-Tickets.Abstract
The implementation of the electronic ticketing system (Electronic Traffic Law Enforcement/ETLE) represents a modernization of traffic law enforcement based on information technology. This study aims to analyze the verification and validation mechanisms of electronic evidence within the ETLE system and assess its compliance with the principles of criminal procedure law, particularly the due process of law, the principle of legal certainty, and the protection of violators' rights. This study employs a normative juridical approach, analyzing laws and regulations and legal doctrine, further strengthened by interview results from Cirebon Resort Police officers. The study's findings indicate that the verification and validation mechanisms for electronic evidence in the ETLE system currently lack standard operating procedures, are conducted entirely internally, and have not been supervised by an independent institution. Furthermore, the use of fake TNKB by perpetrators of violations cannot be effectively detected, leading to errors in identifying legal subjects and potentially infringing upon citizens' constitutional rights. Therefore, the ETLE system necessitates legal and technical reforms, including the establishment of an independent verification agency and strengthened regulations to ensure that electronic evidence can be legally, accurately, and objectively tested. Moreover, bolstering the integration of vehicle data with digital identification systems is crucial to ensure legal certainty and prevent the criminalization of innocent parties.
References
Arshad, H., Jantan, A. Bin, & Abiodun, O. I. (2018). Digital forensics: review of issues in scientific validation of digital evidence. Journal of Information Processing Systems, 14(2), 346–376.
Antara. (2023, Oktober). Hati-hati Penipuan, Polisi Kirim Surat Tilang ETLE Ke Rumah Bukan Via WhatsApp. Media Surat Kabar Online Tempo: https://www.tempo.co/hukum/hati-hati-penipuan-polisi-kirim-surat-tilang-etle-ke-rumah-bukan-via-whatsapp-207534, diakses pada 17 April 2025 pukul 20.19 WIB.
Aribowo, R. I., & Sudarto. (2024). Analisis Pelaksanaan E-Tilang Dalam Upaya Pencegahan Praktik Pungutan Liar Yang Dilakukan Oleh Oknum Polisi Lalu Lintas Di Wilayah Hukum POLRES METRO Jakarta Timur. Jurnal Lex Progressium, 1(1), 150.
Halid, M. Y., Pinasang, R., & Nachrawy, N. (2024). Tilang Elektronik (E-TLE) Terhadap Pelanggaran Lalu Lintas Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2009 Tentang Lalu. Jurnal Lex Privatum, 13(5), 8.
Hartono, B. (2021). Tantangan Implementasi E-Tilang Dalam Perspektif Hukum Acara Pidana. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 10(2), 202.
Jonathan, A. A., & Faozi, S. (2024). Penyelesaian Hukum Pidana Terhadap Pelanggar Lalu Lintas Melalui Sistem E-Tilang Di Kabupaten Batang. Jurnal Yustisi Hukum dan Hukum Islam, 11(2), 324.
Komalasari, R., & Mustafa, C. (2023). Electronic Evidence in The Healthy Justice System: Reimagined. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 12(3), 547–580.
Kusuma, H. (2022). Modernisasi Penegakan Hukum Lalu Lintas Melalui ETLE. Jurnal Yudisial, 15(1), 88.
Mahendara, I. G. A. P. (2022). Upaya Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Dalam Menanggulangi Tindak Pidana Pencurian Yang Dilakukan Pelaku Di Bawah Umur Dengan Penerapan Asas Restorative Justice. Jurnal Hukum Media Justita Nusantara, 12(1), 102.
Mertokusumo, S. (2009). Penemuan Hukum: Sebuah Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Nanda, A. (2022). Hak Terdakwa Dalam Perspektif Fair Trial: Analisis Normatif Terhadap Proses Pembuktian. Jurnal Konstitusi dan HAM, 7(2), 59.
Suratno, D. M. (2018). First Respond Framework Untuk Forensik CCTV. UII: file:///C:/Users/Windows10/Downloads/14917113-Danang%20Mulyadipa-FD-First%20Respond%20Framework.pdf, diakses pada 24 April 2025 pukul 19.00 WIB.
Trisnawati, A. P., Prakoso, A., & Prihatmini, S. (2015). Kekuatan Pembuktian Transaksi Elektronik Dalam Tindak Pidana Perjudian Online Dari Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik (Putusan Nomor 140/Pid.B/2013/PN-Tb). Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Universitas Jember, 1(1), 1.
Wang, X., Wu, Y. C., & Ma, Z. (2024). Blockchain in the courtroom: exploring its evidentiary significance and procedural implications in US judicial processes. Frontiers in Blockchain, 7, 1306058.
Wiguna, H., Fahrozi, & Syafiq, M. I. (2023). Persepsi Masyarakat Tentang Penerapan Tilang Elektronik (Studi Di Wilayah Kota Batam). Jurnal Sosial Politik dan Humaniora, 1(1), 135.
Wulandari, S. A. (2020). Inovasi Penerapan Sistem E-Tilang Di Indonesia. Jurnal Studi Islam dan Sosial Al-Mabsut, 14(1), 2.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Farhan Nabil Wijaya, Wibi Saputro, R. Henda, Agus Dimyati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
