Difference in Language Switching Cost in Language Switching between Dominant and Weak Languages in Early Adult Javanese-Indonesian Bilinguals

Authors

  • Ratih Manggarsari Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
  • Margaretha Margaretha Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v4i9.1504

Keywords:

bilingual, language switching, language switching free

Abstract

This replication experiment study examines the asymmetric cost of language code switching in bilingual Javanese-Indonesian and tests the suitability of the cost pattern with the inertial task set hypothesis. Participants consisted of 72 students (49 women, 23 men; aged 20–23 years) who were native Indonesian speakers with Javanese as a second language (L2) or vice versa. The experiment was carried out using a Microsoft Excel-based program to pronounce numbers in both languages. The response records were analyzed to measure the reaction time (in seconds) of the correct responses. Reaction times for incorrect answers were excluded from the analysis. The average reaction time was analyzed using ANOVA and paired sample t-tests with SPSS version 22. The results showed that there was no significant difference in code transfer costs in the transition from L1 to L2 and vice versa, either in the group with the dominant Indonesian language (L1?L2: M = 0.62 s, SD = 0.12; L2?L1: M = 0.62 s, SD = 0.11; t = 0.24, p = 0.98) or Javanese (L1?L2: M = 0.59 s, SD = 0.11; L2?L1: M = 0.59 s, SD = 0.11; t = 1.05, p = 0.3). However, a significant difference was found between mentions with code transfer (M = 0.61 s, SD = 0.11) and without code switching (M = 0.57 s, SD = 0.1; t = 3.88, p = 0.00). These findings do not support the task set inertia hypothesis and indicate balanced bilingual characteristics in the study subjects.

References

Anjani, I. (2021, Agustus 31). Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Asing Di SMK Perlu Diberi Ruang Dalam Kurikulum. Dipetik November 8, 2017, dari Web Direktorat Pembinaan SMK Direktorat Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan: https://psmk.kemdikbud.go.id/konten/1860/mata-pelajaran-bahasa-asing-di-smk-perlu-diberi-ruang-dalam-kurikulum

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2012). Penduduk Indonesia: Hasil Sensus Penduduk 2010. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik Indonesia.

Bathia, T. K., & Ritchie, C. W. (2021). Handbook of Bilingual. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Bialystok, E. (2010). Bilingualism. WIREs Cogn Sci, 1, 559-572.

Bialystok, E., & Craik, F. I. (2010). Cognitive and Linguistic Processing in the Bilingual Mind, 19(1). Current direction in psychological science,, 19-23.

Calabria, M., Hernández, M., Branzi, F. M., & Costa, A. (2012). Qualitative Differences Between Bilingual Language Control and Executive Control: Evidence from Task-switching. Frontiers in Psychology, 2 (399), 1-10.

Cohn, A. C., & Ravindranath, M. (2022). Local Languages In Indonesia: Language Maintenance or Language Shift? . Linguistik Indonesia, 131-148.

De Groot, A. (2011). Language and Cognition in Bilinguals and Multilinguals: An Introduction. East Sussex: Psychology Press.

Dillon, D. G., & Pizzagalli, D. A. (2021). Inhibition of Action, Thought, and Emotion: A Selective Neurobiological Review. Applied and Preventive Psychology,12(3), 99-114.

Goldstein, S., & Naglieri, J. A. (2022). Handbook of Executive Functioning. New York: Springer International Publishing.

Gross, R. (2010). Psychology: the Science of Mind and Behaviour Book One. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Gross, R. (2010). Psychology: the Science of Mind and Behaviour Book Two. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Harris, L. C. (2021). Language and Cognition. Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science.

Jackson, H., & Stockwell, P. (2011). An Introduction to the Nature and Functions of Language. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2013). Jendela Interaksi Kurikulum: Download Peraturan dan Kebijakan. Dipetik November 8, 2017, dari Website Kurikulum oleh Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia: http://kurikulum.kemdikbud.go.id/ downloads

Meuter, R. F., & Allport, A. (2021). Bilingual Language Switching in Naming: Asymmetrical Costs of Language Selection. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(1), 25-40.

Nasution, S. (2021). Metode Research (Penelitian Ilmiah). Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Pallant, J. (2021). SPSS Survival Manual, 3rd. Berkshire: McGraw Hill.

Paryono, Y. (2021, Oktober 19). Dialek-dialek Bahasa Jawa di Jawa Timur. (R. Manggarsari, Pewawancara)

Santrock, J. (2011). Life-span Development, Thirteen Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Weissberger, G. H., Gollan, T. H., Bondi, M. W., Clark, L. L., & Weirenga, C. E. (2015). Language and task switching in the bilingual brain: Bilinguals are staying, not switching, experts. Neuropsychologia, 66, 193-203.

Yusuf, M. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif & Penelitian Gabungan. Jakarta: Kencana.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-15

How to Cite

Manggarsari, R., & Margaretha , M. . (2025). Difference in Language Switching Cost in Language Switching between Dominant and Weak Languages in Early Adult Javanese-Indonesian Bilinguals . Journal of World Science, 4(9), 1233–1248. https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v4i9.1504