Decentralization and Citizen Participation in the Provision of Local Public Services
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v5i3.1641Keywords:
Decentralization, road infrastructure, local public services, citizen participation, Timor-LesteAbstract
This research analyzes the impact of decentralization policies on the quality of local public services in the road infrastructure sector and evaluates the role of citizen participation in improving road accessibility in Ermera Municipality, Timor-Leste. Decentralization is viewed as a strategy to enhance service delivery and democratic legitimacy through community involvement, yet its effectiveness is often limited by institutional capacity, fiscal dependence on the central government, and weak citizen participation mechanisms. A qualitative case study approach was employed, with data collected through in-depth interviews with local officials, community leaders, and residents, as well as field observations and document analysis. Thematic analysis was used to process the data, ensuring validity through triangulation. The findings show that while decentralization has increased local government authority in road planning and implementation, fiscal constraints, lack of transparency, and weak coordination limit its effectiveness. Citizen participation has a positive impact on identifying needs and supporting project execution, but it remains largely consultative and insufficiently institutionalized, particularly in monitoring and evaluation. In conclusion, decentralization and citizen participation complement each other in improving local public services. Strengthening the technical and fiscal capacity of local governments and institutionalizing citizen involvement at all stages is crucial for achieving inclusive, responsive, and sustainable road infrastructure. The study offers strategic implications for decentralization reforms in developing countries.
References
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2018). Collaborative platforms as a governance strategy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(1), 16–32.
Bardhan, P., & Mookherjee, D. (2020). Decentralization, corruption, and government accountability. In R. Rose-Ackerman & P. Lagunes (Eds.), Greed, corruption, and the modern state (pp. 53–75). Edward Elgar.
Cornwall, A. (2008). Unpacking "participation": Models, meanings and practices. Community Development Journal, 43(3), 269–283.
Dick-Sagoe, C. (2021). Decentralization for improving the provision of public services in developing countries: A critical review. Cogent Economics & Finance, 8(1), Article 1804036.
Diaz-Serrano, L., & Meix-Llop, E. (2019). Decentralization and the quality of public services: Cross-country evidence from educational data. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 37(7), 1296–1316.
Faguet, J.-P. (2020). Decentralization and governance. World Development, 53, 2–13.
Gaventa, J., & Barrett, G. (2012). Mapping the outcomes of citizen engagement. World Development, 40(12), 2399–2410.
Holzhacker, R. L., Wittek, R., & Woltjer, J. (2016). Decentralization and governance in Indonesia. Springer.
Kim, S., & Kang, M. (2022). Linking local collaborative governance and public service delivery: Mediating role of institutional capacity building. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9, Article 421.
Kohtamäki, V., & Pekkola, E. (2021). Decentralization, institutional capacity, and performance in public sector organizations: A systematic review. Public Management Review, 23(9), 1358–1380.
McNaught, R. (2024). The application of collaborative governance in local level climate and disaster resilient development: A global review. Environmental Science & Policy, 151, Article 103627.
Mgomba, E. J. (2020). Decentralization of public services and the role of local government in rural development: Findings from Bangladesh. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 10(1), 249–261.
Muhwezi, M., & Byarugaba, F. K. (2022). Determinants of local government public service quality: Evidence from the developing economy. Public Administration Research, 11(2), 1–18.
Naher, N., et al. (2020). The influence of corruption and governance in the delivery of frontline health care services in the public sector. BMC Public Health, 20, Article 863.
Osei-Kojo, A., & Andrews, N. (2023). Public support for participation in local development. World Development, 176, Article 106228.
Pinto, A. D., & Yates, S. (2022). Citizen engagement in public services in low- and middle-income countries. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 17(3), Article e1254.
Simanjuntak, N., & Tampubolon, M. (2024). Violations of community participatory rights: Testing the ladder of public participation model on the road development program in Indonesia. Springer.
Sintomer, Y., Herzberg, C., & Röcke, A. (2016). Participatory budgeting in Europe: Democracy and public governance. Public Administration and Development, 28(3), 164–175.
Swapan, M. S. H. (2016). Who participates and who doesn't? Adapting community participation model for developing countries. Cities, 53, 70–77.
van Zyl, A. (2021). How civil society organizations close the gap between transparency and accountability. Governance, 27(2), 347–356.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Adelaide de Vasconcelos, Erwin Erwin, Widya Fitriana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
