Analysis of the Benefits of Product Recommendation Features in E-Commerce in Increasing Public Spending
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v5i4.1659Keywords:
recommendations, swot, balance scorecard, community assessmentAbstract
Product recommendations generally appear when users search through search engines such as Google or directly on e-commerce platforms. The platform not only displays one option but also presents several alternatives from various sellers, allowing consumers the convenience of determining the best option according to their needs. Consumers generally expect a variety of product choices because they consider quality, price, and service simultaneously. Therefore, the presence of multiple recommendations is indispensable in today’s digital shopping ecosystem. Based on research conducted through surveys and supported by SWOT and Balanced Scorecard methods, it was concluded that the use of product recommendations in search received a high score, ranging from 4 to 5. These results suggest that product recommendations have the potential to increase public purchasing power; however, they may also encourage unplanned purchases by consumers. The problem previously faced was related to the lack of comprehensive product information on the platform. Platforms that are able to present the most complete and timely information tend to become the primary choice for consumers when shopping. This research identifies the function of product recommendations as a foundation for changing consumer mindsets while providing a wide variety of choices. With a neutral recommendation system, no seller can dominate the market unilaterally. This condition promotes fair pricing and encourages every seller to offer the best products to consumers.
References
Al-Omoush, K. S., de Lucas Ancillo, A., & Gavrila, S. G. (2022). The role of cultural values in social commerce adoption in the Arab world: An empirical study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 176, 121440.
Amelia, L. T. D., & Balqis, N. R. (2023). Changes in communication patterns in the digital age. ARRUS Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(4), 544–556.
Asanprakit, S., & Kraiwanit, T. (2023). Causal factors influencing the use of social commerce platforms. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(4), 100172.
Attar, R. W., Almusharraf, A., Alfawaz, A., & Hajli, N. (2022). New Trends in E-Commerce Research: Linking Social Commerce and Sharing Commerce: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316024
Baghdadi, Y. (2013). From E-commerce to social commerce: A framework to guide enabling cloud computing. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 8(3), 12–38. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762013000300003
Bazi, S., Haddad, H., Al-Amad, A. H., Rees, D., & Hajli, N. (2022). Investigating the Impact of Situational Influences and Social Support on Social Commerce during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 17(1), 104–121. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer17010006
Emon, M. M. H., Chowdhury, M. S. A., Islam, M. S., & Nath, A. (2026). Value Perception, Digital Ownership, and Scarcity in Consumer-Brand Interactions Within Digital Payment Ecosystems. In Impacts of Digital Payment Systems on Marketing (pp. 231–270). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
Et.al, N. P. (2021). Identifying Social Commerce Features towards Improving a Social Commerce Website. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(3), 2053–2057. https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i3.1073
Fardani, I., Agustina, I. H., & Jauzi, F. A. (2020). Implementing SWOT analysis in engineering education. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 830(3), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/830/3/032066
Gensler, S., & Rangaswamy, A. (2025). An emerging future for digital marketing: From products and services to sequenced solutions. Journal of Business Research, 190, 115230.
Hanandini, D. (2024). Social transformation in modern society: A literature review on the role of technology in social interaction. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekotrans & Erudisi, 4(1), 82–95.
Hassan, M., Iqbal, Z., & Khanum, B. (2018). The role of trust and social presence in social commerce purchase intention. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Science, 12(1), 111–135.
Lin, X., & Wang, X. (2023). Towards a model of social commerce: improving the effectiveness of e-commerce through leveraging social media tools based on consumers’ dual roles. European Journal of Information Systems, 32(5), 782–799.
Molinillo, S., Liébana-Cabanillas, F., & Anaya-Sánchez, R. (2018). A social commerce intention model for traditional E-commerce sites. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 13(2), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762018000200107
Nistah, N. M., Sura, S., Yusof, M. M., & Lee, O. (2019). The effect of social feature quality on the social commerce system. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 10(7), 136–140. https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2019.0100720
Sura, S. B., Nistah, N. M., Lee, S., & Benz, D. (2021). Using Eye Tracking Approach in Analyzing Social Network Site Area of Interest for Consumers’ Decision Making in Social Commerce. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 12(10), 690–697. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2021.0121076
Tseng, H.-T. (2023). Shaping path of trust: the role of information credibility, social support, information sharing and perceived privacy risk in social commerce. Information Technology & People, 36(2), 683–700.
Xia, L., Baghaie, S., & Sajadi, S. M. (2024). The digital economy: Challenges and opportunities in the new era of technology and electronic communications. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 15(2), 102411.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Danny Ong, Imron Imron, M. Sinta Nurhayati, Andi Rosano

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
















