State Fundamental Consensus in Indonesia's Foreign Policy Implementation Amid Contemporary Global Geopolitical Dynamics: A Normative-Strategic Analysis

Authors

  • Heriyana Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Indonesia
  • Nabila Saifani Azzahra Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v5i5.1667

Keywords:

state fundamental consensus, foreign policy, geopolitics, wawasan nusantara, independent-active, strategic autonomy, middle power, pancasila-geopolitics framework

Abstract

This research conducts an in-depth examination of the relationship between Indonesia's four fundamental state consensuses Pancasila, the 1945 Constitution (UUD 1945), Bhinneka Tunggal Ika, and the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia (NKRI) within the Wawasan Nusantara framework in the implementation of an independent-active foreign policy amidst increasingly complex and multipolar global geopolitical dynamics. This research employed a normative-strategic analytical approach integrated with Kenneth Waltz's Domestic Level of Analysis and middle power diplomacy conceptualization. Using literature study, the research finds that Pancasila as the ideological foundation functions as an ideological filter providing humanistic value orientation alongside a normative conflict resolution mechanism in diplomatic decision-making. Furthermore, the 1945 Constitution affirms the constitutional mandate of the independent-active principle, which in the multipolar era must be operationalized as strategic autonomy, namely Indonesia's capacity to maintain strategic maneuverability between major powers. Additionally, Bhinneka Tunggal Ika promotes an inclusive diplomatic approach that positions Indonesia as a unique bridging actor between the Islamic world, Asian democracy, and the global community. Finally, NKRI through Wawasan Nusantara shapes a maritime geopolitical identity that forms the basis for Indonesia's legitimate interest claims in the Indo-Pacific region. This study identifies five critical geopolitical arenas the South China Sea dispute, Indo-Pacific rivalry, Middle East conflict, Myanmar crisis, and post-COVID-19 global governance and analyzes how fundamental state consensuses provide normative guidance across each. The original contribution lies in developing the Pancasila-Geopolitics Framework (PGF), a new analytical model that systematically connects domestic ideological foundations with Indonesia's foreign policy behavior.

References

Allison, G. (2017). *Destined for war: Can America and China escape Thucydides's trap?* Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Anwar, D. F. (2020). Indonesia and the ASEAN outlook on the Indo-Pacific: A cooperative security initiative in a contested region. *Pacific Review*.

Arasy, A., & Nelwati, S. (2023). Indonesia challenges in maintaining national identity in the era of globalisation. *Hakamain: Journal of Sharia and Law Studies, 2*(1), 129–138.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). *Proyeksi penduduk Indonesia 2024*. Badan Pusat Statistik Republik Indonesia.

Fealy, G. (2022). Indonesia's foreign policy in the age of Jokowi. *Asian Affairs*.

Fitriani, E. (2020). Indonesia's foreign policy during COVID-19: Defending national interests multilaterally. *Journal of ASEAN Studies*.

Ikenberry, G. J. (2023). *A world safe for democracy: Liberal internationalism and the crises of global order*. Yale University Press.

Jordan, J. (2022). The role of national identity in Indonesia’s contemporary defence strategy. *?????? ? ????? ? ???: ???????? ??????????????, ???????????? ???????? ? ?????????? ????????. ? 25-????? ??????????? ??????????? ? 30-????? ????????? ?????? ? ?????: ??????? ??????? ??????*, 113–117.

Kahler, M. (2020). Rising powers and the future of global governance. *Pacific Review*.

Karim, M. F. (2019). Indonesia and the dilemma of the middle power identity in ASEAN. *Asian Politics & Policy*.

Laksmana, E. A. (2019). Reshuffling the deck? Domestic politics and foreign policy change in Indonesia. *Contemporary Southeast Asia*.

Mearsheimer, J. J. (2019). Bound to fail: The rise and fall of the liberal international order. *International Security*.

Natalegawa, M. (2018). *Does ASEAN matter? A view from within*. ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute.

Purnomo, A., & Kurniawan, G. F. (2025). Unearthing the intellectual roots of the name “Indonesia”: Construction of national identity among high school students in Indonesia. *Social and Education History, 14*(3), 209–228.

Ravenhill, J. (2021). *Asia's global power: China and the East Asian order*. Routledge.

Rother, S. (2021). Human rights and Southeast Asian regionalism: Indonesia's role in constructing the ASEAN way. *Pacific Affairs*.

Solehudin, R. H. (2023). Indonesia’s geostrategic position in global and regional politics: Government preparation. *Revenue Journal: Management and Entrepreneurship, 1*(2), 81–89.

Thayer, C. A. (2021). South China Sea disputes: ASEAN, China, and the United States in a period of strategic competition. *Asian Security*.

Wirajuda, H. (2021). Indonesia's free and active foreign policy: Constitutional mandate and its contemporary application. *Indonesian Journal of International Law*.

World Bank. (2024). *Indonesia economic update: Investing in people*. World Bank Group.

Wulandari, S., & Pratama, A. (2022). Kepentingan nasional Indonesia dalam konflik Laut China Selatan: Perspektif wawasan nusantara. *Jurnal Hubungan Internasional*.

Yudhoyono, S. B. (2020). *Mega trends: The future of democracy, peace and prosperity*. The Jakarta Post Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-28

How to Cite

Heriyana, & Azzahra , N. S. . (2026). State Fundamental Consensus in Indonesia’s Foreign Policy Implementation Amid Contemporary Global Geopolitical Dynamics: A Normative-Strategic Analysis. Journal of World Science, 5(5), 508–520. https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v5i5.1667