Community Sovereignty as A Regulatory Membrane: Governing Systemic Vitality in Regenerative Tourism Destinations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v5i7.1691Keywords:
regenerative tourism, community sovereignty, destination governance, systems thinking, tourism metabolismAbstract
Regenerative tourism has emerged as a transformative paradigm capable of addressing the structural limitations of sustainable tourism by repositioning destinations as living social–ecological systems. Consequently, regeneration is often framed as an aspirational outcome rather than as a governed systemic condition. This article argues that the transformative potential of regenerative tourism cannot be realized without addressing the issue of structural regulation. Drawing on living systems thinking and political economy perspectives, this paper introduces community sovereignty as a regulatory membrane that governs selective permeability within a destination’s metabolic system. Employing a conceptual theory-building approach, this study develops an integrative analytical framework that reconceptualizes destination governance as an active process of metabolic regulation rather than merely a coordinative arrangement. The framework identifies four key regulatory dimensions—collective decision-making authority, institutional coherence, normative orientation, and adaptive enforcement capacity—which collectively determine the quality and intensity of tourism flows. These theoretical propositions are empirically illustrated through analytical vignettes that contrast the extractive tendencies of highly permeable systems with the sovereign regulatory architecture of the Binyan Customary Forest (Hutan Adat Binyan) (Wanaprastha) in Bali. This article contributes to regenerative tourism scholarship by shifting the analytical focus from participation toward regulatory capacity and by reframing governance as an active practice of boundary-setting. Ultimately, this framework provides a robust foundation for analyzing systemic vitality as a governable condition amid intensifying global tourism pressures.
References
Ateljevic, I. (2020). Transforming the (tourism) world for good and (re)generating the potential “new normal”. Tourism Geographies, 22(3), 467–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2020.1759134
Bellato, L., Cheer, J. M., & Lew, A. A. (2022). Regenerative tourism: Reclaiming tourism for people, place and planet. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 30(12), 2569–2586. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2022.2062019
Bellato, L., Frantzeskaki, N., & Nygaard, C. A. (2022). Regenerative tourism: A conceptual framework leveraging theory and practice. Tourism Geographies, 25(4), 1045–1064. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2022.2044376
Berkes, F. (2004). Rethinking community-based conservation. Conservation Biology, 18(3), 621–630. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00077.x
Bianchi, R. V. (2018). The political economy of tourism development: A critical review. Annals of Tourism Research, 70, 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2017.08.005
Bramwell, B., & Lane, B. (2011). Critical research on the governance of tourism and sustainability. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19(4-5), 411–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2011.580586
Büscher, B., & Fletcher, R. (2020). The conservation revolution: Radical ideas for saving nature beyond the Anthropocene. Verso Books.
Butler, R. W. (2015). The evolution of tourism and tourism research. Tourism Recreation Research, 40(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2015.1007632
Cave, J., & Dredge, D. (2020). Regenerative tourism needs diverse economic practices. Tourism Geographies, 22(3), 503–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2020.1768434
Chambers, D., & Buzinde, C. (2015). Tourism and decolonisation: Locating research and self. Annals of Tourism Research, 51, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2014.12.002
Chassagne, N., & Everingham, P. (2019). Buen Vivir: Degrowing extractivism and growing wellbeing through tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 27(12), 1909–1925. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2019.1660668
Cheer, J. M. (2020). Human flourishing, tourism transformation and COVID-19: A conceptual touchstone. Tourism Geographies, 22(3), 514–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2020.1765016
Dredge, D. (2022). Regenerative tourism: Transforming mindsets, systems and practices. Journal of Tourism Futures, 8(3), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1108/JTF-01-2022-0015
Dwyer, L. (2018). Saluting while the ship sinks: The necessity for tourism paradigm change. Journal of Travel Research, 57(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287517702812
Farrell, B. H., & Twining-Ward, L. (2004). Reconceptualizing tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 31(2), 274–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2003.12.002
Fletcher, R., Murray, I., Blanco-Romero, A., & Blázquez-Salom, M. (2019). Tourism and degrowth: An emerging agenda for research and praxis. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 27(12), 1745–1763. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2019.1600005
Hall, C. M. (2011). A typology of governance and its implications for tourism policy analysis. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19(4-5), 437–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2011.570346
Hes, D., & du Plessis, C. (2015). Designing for hope: Pathways to regenerative sustainability. Routledge.
Higgins-Desbiolles, F. (2018). Sustainable tourism: Sustaining tourism or something more? Tourism Management Perspectives, 25, 157–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2017.11.017
Higgins-Desbiolles, F. (2020). Socialising tourism for social and ecological justice after COVID-19. Tourism Geographies, 22(3), 610–623.
Higgins-Desbiolles, F., Carnicelli, S., Krolikowski, C., Wijesinghe, G., & Boluk, K. (2022). Degrowing tourism: Humanity in harmony with nature. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 30(12), 2739–2759. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2021.1905649
Lew, A. A., Cheer, J. M., Haywood, M., Brouder, P., & Salazar, N. B. (2020). Visions of travel and tourism after the global COVID-19 transformation of 2020. Tourism Geographies, 22(3), 455–466.
Mang, P., & Reed, B. (2012). Designing from place: A regenerative framework and methodology. Building Research & Information, 40(1), 23–38.
Matunga, H., McIntosh, A., & Carr, A. (2020). From exploitative to regenerative tourism: Tino rangatiratanga and tourism in Aotearoa New Zealand. MAI Journal, 9(2), 144–158.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
Pollock, A. (2019). Regenerative tourism: The natural evolution of travel. Conscious Travel.
Reed, B. (2007). Shifting from ‘sustainability’ to regeneration. Building Research & Information, 35(6), 674–680.
Sadeghi, H., Cheung, C., Yunusa-Kaltungo, A., & Manu, P. (2025). A systematic review of occupational safety and health in modular integrated construction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106897
Scheyvens, R. (2011). Tourism and poverty. Routledge.
Scheyvens, R., & Biddulph, R. (2018). Inclusive tourism development. Tourism Geographies, 20(4), 589–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2018.1434821
Sheller, M. (2021). Advanced introduction to mobilities. Edward Elgar Publishing
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 IGW Suyasa, Diah Suryandari, Erik Susanto, Sugiarto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.















