The Impact of Visionary Leadership, Teacher Competence, and Learning Innovation on Educational Quality: A Correlational Study of Private High School Teachers in Tangerang City
Keywords:
visionary leadership, teacher competence, learning innovation, quality of education, correlational regression analysisAbstract
This study aims to determine the influence of Visionary Leadership, Teacher Competence, and Learning Innovation on Education Quality, both partially and simultaneously, in private high school teachers in Tangerang City. This study uses a quantitative approach with a correlational method. Data were collected through questionnaires distributed to 115 selected respondents using sampling techniques, then analyzed using analytical prerequisite tests (normality, homogeneity, and linearity) as well as simple and multiple linear regression analysis with the help of SPSS 25. The results showed that Visionary Leadership had a positive and significant effect on the Quality of Education (?yx1 = 0.703; count 9.761 > table 1.981), Teacher Competence had a positive and significant effect on the Quality of Education (?yx2 = 0.162; count 2.008 > table 1.981), and Learning Innovation had a positive and significant effect on the Quality of Education (?yx3 = 0.035; count 1.987 > table 1.981). Simultaneously, these three variables also have a significant effect on the Quality of Education with a Fcal value of 89.794 at a significance level of 0.000 < 0.05, forming a regression equation Y = 0.703X1 + 0.162X2 + 0.035X3. Visionary Leadership proved to be the most dominant variable that affects the Quality of Education compared to the other two variables. These findings confirm that improving the quality of education in private high schools will be more effective if it is focused on strengthening the visionary leadership of school principals, without neglecting teacher competency improvement and continuous learning innovation.
References
Agasisti, T., & Zoido, P. (2018). Comparing the efficiency of schools through international benchmarking: Results from an empirical analysis of OECD PISA 2012 data. Educational Researcher, 47(6), 352–362.
Agasisti, T., & Zoido, P. (2018). Comparing the efficiency of schools through international benchmarking: Results from an empirical analysis of OECD PISA 2012 data. Educational Researcher, 47(6), 352–362.
Aida, H., Hermina, D., & Norlaila. (2025). Aida et al., types of quantitative research data. 10(1).
Arribas Díaz, J. A., & Martínez-Mediano, C. (2018). The impact of ISO quality management systems on primary and secondary schools in Spain. Quality Assurance in Education, 26(1), 2–24.
Díez, F., Villa, A., López, A. L., & Iraurgi, I. (2020). Impact of quality management systems in the performance of educational centers: Educational policies and management processes. Heliyon, 6(4).
Dorn, E., Hancock, B., Sarakatsannis, J., & Viruleg, E. (2020). COVID-19 and student learning in the United States: The hurt could last a lifetime. McKinsey & Company.
Fletcher, E. C., Jr., Warren, N. Q., & Hernández-Gantes, V. M. (2018). Preparing high school students for a changing world: College, career, and future ready learners. Career and Technical Education Research, 43(1), 77–97.
González-Salamanca, J. C., Agudelo, O. L., & Salinas, J. (2020). Key competences, education for sustainable development and strategies for the development of 21st century skills: A systematic literature review.
Hamilton, D., McKechnie, J., Edgerton, E., & Wilson, C. (2021). Immersive virtual reality as a pedagogical tool in education: A systematic literature review of quantitative learning outcomes and experimental design. Journal of Computers in Education, 8(1), 1–32.
Hermina, D., & Huda, N. (2024). Understanding populations and samples: A key pillar in quantitative research. Syntax Admiration, 5(12).
Hidayah, A. (2022). Internal quality assurance system of education in financing standards and assessment standards. Indonesian Journal of Education (INJOE), 1(3), 291–300.
Kauffman, H. (2015). A review of predictive factors of student success in and satisfaction with online learning. Research in Learning Technology, 23.
Lestari, A., Fitrisia, A., & Ofianto. (2022). Science methodology: Quantitative and qualitative in the form of implementation, 4.
Lindawati, V., Soegeng, A. Y., & Kusumaningsih, W. (2025). Veronica.
Nurhaswinda, Pratasya, M., Nada, Q. L., Nanda, T. R., Neftihana, Harnida, S., Pratiwi, U., Mauluddin, A., Taskia, S., & Alpenita, V. (2025). Correlational journal Nurhaswinda.
Pambudi, N. A., & Harjanto, B. (2020). Vocational education in Indonesia: History, development, opportunities, and challenges. Children and Youth Services Review, 115, 105092.
Putri, A. R., Ramadhan, G., Fauzi, A., & Zohriah, A. (2025). Visionary leadership of the principal in improving quality. Scientific Journal of Educational Forums, 284–292.
Soulé, H., & Warrick, T. (2015). Defining 21st century readiness for all students: What we know and how to get there. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(2), 178.
Stehle, S. M., & Peters-Burton, E. E. (2019). Developing student 21st century skills in selected exemplary inclusive STEM high schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 39.
Subhaktiyasa, P. G. (2024). Determining populations and samples: Quantitative and qualitative research methodological approaches. Scientific Journal of the Education Profession, 9(4), 2721–2731. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v9i4.2657
Sumaryanti, S., & Purwanto, N. A. (2023). Achieving the quality of education through the application of eight national education standards using school-based management. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(1), 135–146.
Suriyah, Siregar, F., & Siregar, H. (2025). Journal X3 to Y: Learning innovations to improve the quality of education at MDTA An-Nuur.
Turmuzi, Marwan, & Munawar. (2026). The effect of the implementation of the independent curriculum, infrastructure facilities and teacher competence on improving the quality of education in high schools. Journal of Education and Islamic Management. http://jurnal.uinsu.ac.id/index.php/hijri
Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Pant, H. A., & Coates, H. (2016). Assessing student learning outcomes in higher education: Challenges and international perspectives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(5), 655–661.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Akbar, Yulita Pujilestari, Imas Masriah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
