Educational Incompatibility: The Necessary Interdisciplinarity of Overeducation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v1i12.171Keywords:
Educational Incompatibility, Interdisciplinary Approach, Overeducation in Academic StudiesAbstract
Introduction: the fragility of academic discussions about overeducation is often limited to the scope and macroeconomic consequences of these discussions, ignoring the social, anthropological, political, and educational aspects of education. This study aims to find out and analyze how important education must take precedence. Method: This study uses a qualitative descriptive method with the type of library research (Library Research). Publications were searched in four scientific databases: Scielo, Thesis and Dissertation Digital Library (BTD), Portugal Scientific Open Access Repository (RCAAP), and DIALnet. Results: The development of academic research on educational dissonance recapitulated, placed its findings within the scope of economics, and demonstrated that, to date, economics has remained the main driving force of study in the field. Interdisciplinary tools are essential for dealing with the integrality of the problem of over-education in order to propose viable solutions. Conclusion: Now, if the solutions found so far in economics are not feasible (given the obvious contradictions of reality), it is necessary to overcome educational incompatibility from an interdisciplinary prism, which results in points such as the formulation and evaluation of public policies.
References
Bufrem, L. S., dos Santos, R. N. M., & Sobral, N. V. (n.d.). Influências Intelectuais Da Comunidade De Bolsistas De Produtividade Em Pesquisa Do Cnpq Da Área De Ciência Da Informação. Diálogos Sobre Bibliometria E Cientometria, 73.
Chueke, G. V., & Amatucci, M. (2015). O que é bibliometria? Uma introdução ao Fórum. Internext, 10(2), 1–5.
Cruickshank, J., & Sassower, R. (2017). Democratic problem-solving: Dialogues in social epistemology. Rowman & Littlefield.
Darmalaksana, W. (2020). Metode penelitian kualitatif studi pustaka dan studi lapangan. Pre-Print Digital Library UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.
Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2014). Complexity and education: Inquiries into learning, teaching, and research. Routledge.
Denney, A. S., & Tewksbury, R. (2013). How to write a literature review. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 24(2), 218–234.
Dias Sobrinho, J. (2005). Educação superior, globalização e democratização: qual universidade? Revista Brasileira de Educação, 164–173.
Dros, A., & Gaizutyte, M. (2013). Job Mismatch in the Danish Labour Market.
Festinger, L. (1975). Teoria da dissonância cognitiva. Zahar.
Kabeer, N. (2021). Gender Equality, Inclusive Growth, and Labour Markets. In Women’s Economic Empowerment (pp. 13–48). Routledge.
Lauder, H., & Mayhew, K. (2020). Higher education and the labour market: an introduction. In Oxford Review of Education (Vol. 46, Issue 1, pp. 1–9). Taylor & Francis.
Lawson, S., Sanders, K., & Smith, L. (2015). Commodification of the information profession: A critique of higher education under neoliberalism. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 3(1).
Leuven, E., & Oosterbeek, H. (2011). Overeducation and mismatch in the labor market. Handbook of the Economics of Education, 4, 283–326.
Somers, M. A., Cabus, S. J., Groot, W., & van den Brink, H. M. (2019). Horizontal mismatch between employment and field of education: Evidence from a systematic literature review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 33(2), 567–603.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2016). Inequality and economic growth.
Tikly, L. (2015). What works, for whom, and in what circumstances? Towards a critical realist understanding of learning in international and comparative eTikly, L. (2015). What works, for whom, and in what circumstances? Towards a critical realist understanding of learning. International Journal of Educational Development, 40, 237–249.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of World Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
