Internalising Bankruptcy Externalities: A Judicial Framework for Proportional Insolvency Intervention in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v5i10.1711Keywords:
bankruptcy externalities, counterfactual attribution, remedy design, judicial reasoning, orderly wind-downAbstract
Bankruptcy remedies can impose costs on employees, consumers, suppliers, and other stakeholders beyond the immediate debtor–creditor relationship. In Indonesia, scholarly debate has largely focused on bankruptcy eligibility, leaving the consequences of remedy design comparatively underexamined. This study aimed to develop a judicial framework for identifying and mitigating external costs attributable to insolvency remedies while preserving creditor protection. Prescriptive normative legal research was conducted using statutory, conceptual, case-based, and functional comparative approaches. The analysis examined the Telkomsel, Batavia Air, and Sritex cases, with Garuda Indonesia’s restructuring serving as a comparator, drawing on legislation, judicial decisions, issuer disclosures, institutional reports, and published sources. The findings indicated that remedy-attributable externalities varied according to the debtor’s financial condition and the manner in which the remedy was implemented. The Telkomsel case illustrated the potential costs of imposing bankruptcy on a solvent company; Batavia Air highlighted the disruption associated with an abrupt cessation of operations; and Sritex demonstrated the importance of distinguishing externalities arising from underlying business failure from potentially avoidable costs attributable to the implementation of insolvency remedies. Garuda Indonesia’s restructuring illustrated how restructuring mechanisms can preserve operational continuity. The study proposed the Bankruptcy Externality Internalisation Test, comprising stakeholder identification, counterfactual attribution, remedy design, and a reasoned externality statement. This framework provides a basis for transparent and proportionate judicial intervention in insolvency proceedings without altering bankruptcy eligibility requirements or granting affected stakeholders veto rights. However, whether the proposed framework can effectively reduce remedy-attributable external costs while preserving creditor recovery remains subject to empirical validation.
References
Aprita, S. (2021). Perlindungan hukum bagi debitor di Indonesia sehubungan tidak adanya insolvency test [Legal protection for debtors in Indonesia in the absence of an insolvency test]. ADALAH: Buletin Hukum dan Keadilan, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.15408/adalah.v5i3.27640
Central Jakarta Commercial Court. (2012). Decision No. 48/Pailit/2012/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst jo. Supreme Court Decision No. 704 K/Pdt.Sus/2012.
CNBC Indonesia. (2024, October 30). Ini perusahaan yang bikin Sritex pailit, ternyata konglomerasi India [The company that bankrupted Sritex].
CNN Indonesia. (2022, October 26). PKPU Garuda Indonesia resmi berakhir damai [Garuda Indonesia's PKPU officially ends in composition].
CNN Indonesia. (2023, February 22). Kronologi pembubaran Merpati, dari merugi, digugat hingga pailit [Chronology of Merpati's dissolution].
Detik.com. (2013a, January 30). Batavia Air pailit, berhenti beroperasi mulai malam ini pukul 00.00 WIB [Batavia Air bankrupt, ceases operations at midnight].
Detik.com. (2013b, February 19). Telkomsel dibela menteri, kurator tak ciut nyali [Telkomsel defended by ministers; receiver undeterred].
Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Negara. (2012, September 25). Telkomsel: Putusan pailit tak pengaruhi kinerja [Telkomsel: Bankruptcy ruling does not affect performance].
European Parliament & Council of the European Union. (2019). Directive (EU) 2019/1023 of 20 June 2019 on preventive restructuring frameworks, on discharge of debt and disqualifications, and on measures to increase the efficiency of procedures concerning restructuring, insolvency and discharge of debt. Official Journal of the European Union, L 172.
Ferguson, N. L. (2024). Analisis PKPU PT Garuda Indonesia pada masa pandemi Covid-19 (Studi Putusan No. 425/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2021/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst jo. No. 1454 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2022) [Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Pelita Harapan].
Firmansyah, F., Palit, S. M. L., & Reba, W. H. (2025). Juridical analysis of the bankruptcy of PT Sritex based on Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations. West Science Law and Human Rights, 3(2), 157–163. https://doi.org/10.58812/wslhr.v3i02.1828
Gaol, R. L., Tobing, G. L., & Wijayati, R. A. (2021). Penerapan asas kelangsungan usaha atas debitor pailit dalam perkara kepailitan [Applying the going concern principle to bankrupt debtors in bankruptcy cases]. Jurnal Hukum To-Ra, 7(1).
Government Regulation No. 8 of 2023 on the Dissolution of the State-Owned Enterprise PT Merpati Nusantara Airlines (Persero) (Indonesia).
Hukumonline. (2012, September 15). Terbukti berutang, Telkomsel dipailitkan [Proven indebted, Telkomsel declared bankrupt].
Hukumonline. (2013a, January 30). Batavia Air diputus pailit [Batavia Air declared bankrupt].
Hukumonline. (2013b, March 1). Nasib konsumen dalam kasus kepailitan [The fate of consumers in bankruptcy cases].
Insolvency Act 1986, Schedule B1, paragraph 3 (United Kingdom).
Insolvenzordnung [German Insolvency Code], § 157 (Germany).
Irianto, C. (2015). Penerapan asas kelangsungan usaha dalam penyelesaian perkara kepailitan dan penundaan kewajiban pembayaran utang (PKPU) [Applying the going concern principle in bankruptcy and PKPU cases]. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 4(3), 399–418.
Jackson, T. H. (1986). The logic and limits of bankruptcy law. Harvard University Press.
Katadata. (2025a, February 2). Tagihan utang Sritex capai Rp 29,8 triliun, termasuk ke Bea Cukai dan PLN [Sritex's debts reach IDR 29.8 trillion].
Katadata. (2025b, February 28). Sritex tutup per 1 Maret 2025, 10.665 karyawan kena PHK [Sritex closes on 1 March 2025; 10,665 employees laid off].
Kiemas, A., Matheus, J., & Gunadi, A. (2023). Redefining bankruptcy law: Incorporating the principle of business continuity for fair debt resolution. Rechtsidee, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v12i2.996
Kompas.id. (2025, January 14). Tim kurator tak gunakan "going concern" untuk Sritex [Receivers will not use going concern for Sritex].
Kontan. (2013, February 18). Kurator: Fee dari Telkomsel untuk panti asuhan [Receiver: Fee from Telkomsel to go to orphanages].
Korobkin, D. R. (1991). Rehabilitating values: A jurisprudence of bankruptcy. Columbia Law Review, 91(4), 717–789.
Law No. 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (Indonesia).
Law No. 40 of 2007 on Limited Liability Companies (Indonesia).
Law No. 48 of 2009 on Judicial Power (Indonesia).
Liputan6.com. (2013, January 30). Diputus pailit, Batavia Air akan PHK 3.500 karyawan [Declared bankrupt, Batavia Air to lay off 3,500 employees].
Liputan6.com. (2024, January 28). MA tolak kasasi Greylag terkait PKPU Garuda Indonesia [Supreme Court rejects Greylag's cassation in Garuda's PKPU].
Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian hukum [Legal research] (Rev. ed.). Kencana.
Pratama, B. (2021). Akibat hukum terhadap perusahaan solven yang dinyatakan pailit oleh pengadilan (Studi terhadap kasus PT Telekomunikasi Selular dengan PT Prima Jaya Informatika pada Putusan No. 704 K/Pdt.Sus/2012) [Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Islam Riau].
Santosa, D. G. G., Dewi, E., & Fardiansyah, A. I. (2026). Constraining bankruptcy as an ultimum remedium: Evidence from Indonesia in comparative perspective with the United States and Singapore. International Journal of Business, Law, and Education, 7(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.56442/ijble.v7i1.1332
Shubhan, M. H. (2019). Deconstructing simple evidence in bankruptcy petition for legal certainty. Indonesia Law Review, 9(2), 66–108. https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v9n2.527
Sihombing, A. H. S., & Meliala, A. J. (2026). Assessment of the business prospects of bankrupt debtors in the implementation of the going concern principle: A legal review under Indonesia's bankruptcy regime. Eduvest – Journal of Universal Studies, 6(1), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v6i1.52620
Supreme Court of Indonesia. (2022). Decision No. 1714 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2022.
Supreme Court Regulation No. 4 of 2019 amending Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 of 2015 on Small Claims Procedure (Indonesia).
United States Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §§ 1113, 1114, 1129(a)(11).
Warren, E. (1987). Bankruptcy policy. The University of Chicago Law Review, 54(3), 775–814.
Warsito, L. (2024). Urgensi pembuktian syarat kepailitan dan tes insolvensi dalam permohonan kepailitan [The urgency of proving bankruptcy requirements and an insolvency test in bankruptcy petitions]. USM Law Review, 7(2), 822–834. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i2.9018
Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2101 et seq. (United States).
Zweigert, K., & Kötz, H. (1998). An introduction to comparative law (3rd ed., T. Weir, Trans.). Clarendon Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Royana Lumban Gaol, Hulman Panjaitan, Dhaniswara K. Harjono, Tomson Situmeang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
