Legal Protection for Creditors Regarding Default and Unilateral Transfer of Fiduciary Guarantee Vehicles Based on the Principle of Justice

Hirwansyah Hirwansyah; Jesse  Heber Ambuwaru

doi:10.58344/jws.v2i1.197

Authors

Hirwansyah Hirwansyah Jesse Heber Ambuwaru
Jesse Heber Ambuwaru Universitas Trisakti

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v2i1.197

Keywords:

default, unilateral transfer, legal protection, compensation lawsuit

Abstract

Indonesian people generally buy private vehicles by using credit facilities or making monthly payments to finance companies to own their vehicles. Vehicles purchased on credit are bound by using fiduciary guarantees prone to being pawned, rented out and transferred by the debtor unilaterally. The reason was due to default so that the fiduciary guarantee vehicle was diverted so that it could be confiscated by POLRI investigators to be used as evidence. As a result of the unilateral transfer of the debtor, the creditor suffers a loss, so that the creditor must be legally protected. The purpose of this research is to find out and analyze the legal protection for credit related to violations and diversion of vehicles based on the principle of justice. The method in this research is qualitative research with empirical and normative juridical approaches. Empirical juridical research prioritizes secondary data, books, laws and regulations and examines positive legal principles from literary data and comparative law. The fiduciary giver must be responsible, carry out his obligations and keep the collateral object under his control. However, in reality it does not rule out the possibility of the Fiduciary Guarantee object changing hands or transferring control to a third party because it is transferred by the debtor, usually due to economic factors. The existence of Law no. 42 of 1999 concerning guarantees in Indonesia which are lex specialis derogat legi general, is one of the legal principles which implies that specific legal rules will override general legal rules.

References

Emma Aulia, S. H. (2019). Upaya Hukum Keberatan dan Tergugat dalam Gugatan Sederhana. Nusamedia.

Fahirattunisa, M. N., Imaniyati, N. S., & Supriatna, R. (2022). Kedudukan Hukum Debt Collector dalam Melaksanakan Penagihan Kepada Debitur Perusahaan Pembiayaan dan Tanggung Jawabnya di Hubungkan dengan Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 35/POJK. 05/2018 tentang Penyelenggaraan Usaha Perusahaan Pembiayaan. Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies, 2 (1). https://doi.org/10.29313/bcsls.v2i1.2258

Junaidi, S. H., & MH, C. L. A. (2022). Hukum Lembaga Pembiayaan. Penerbit Adab.

Kausar, M. (2017). Pemberian Kredit Dengan Jaminan Fidusia Yang Tidak Didaftarkan. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum Keperdataan, 1 (1), 138–151.

Nasarudin, M. I. (2014). Aspek hukum pasar modal Indonesia. Kencana.

Nurwulan, P. (2018). Akad Perbankan Syariah dan Penerapannya dalam Akta Notaris Menurut Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 25 (3), 623–644. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol25.iss3.art10

Paparang, F. (2014). Implementasi jaminan fidusia dalam pemberian kredit di Indonesia. Jurnal LPPM Bidang EkoSosBudKum, 1 (2), 56–70.

Prasetiono, D. (2017). Pelaksanaan Pinjam Pakai Barang Bukti Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas di Kepolisian Resor Banyumas. Universitas Jenderal Soedirman.

Purba, B., Susanti, E., Mustaqim, Y., Wisnujati, N. S., Hasan, M., Aisyah, H., Hariyanti, A. I., & Sudarmanto, E. (2021). Etika Ekonomi. Yayasan Kita Menulis.

Putra, I. C. K. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Notaris Terhadap Perjanjian Perikatan Jual Beli yang Diikuti dengan Adanya Pengakuan Hutang. Universitas Islam Indonesia.

Rufaida, K. K. (2019). Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Tanpa Titel Eksekutorial Yang Sah. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4 (1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2019.v4.i1.p21-40

Safa’at, M. A. (2011). Pemikiran Keadilan (Plato, Aristoteles, dan John Rawls). Dikutip Http://Safaat. Lecture. Ub. Ac. Id/Files/2011/1.

Sanusi, S., Rizkianto, K., & Asmarudin, I. (2017). Perlindungan Hukum Dalam Perjanjian Fidusia. Diya Media Group.

Satrio, J. (2002). Hukum jaminan hak jaminan kebendaan Fidusia. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Satriya, R. R. E. (2020). Pengalihan Obyek Jaminan Fidusia oleh Debitur Tanpa Persetujuan Kreditur dalam Perjanjian Kredit Bank. Diakses Dari Http://Mnotariat. Narotama. Ac. Id/Wp-Content/Uploads/2016/05/Pengalihanobyek-Jaminan-Fidusia-Oleh-Debitur-Tanpa-Persetujuankreditur-Dalam-Perjanjian-Kredit-Bank. Pdf, Pada Tanggal, 12.

Sinaulan, J. H. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Warga Masyarakat. Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Budaya, 4 (1).

Siskaniati, M., Hamidah, S., & Sudirman, M. (2022). Peran Notaris Terhadap Penerapan Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak Pada Perjanjian Baku Pembiayaan Kendaraan Bermotor Dengan Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019. Jurnal Hukum Dan Kenotariatan, 6 (1), 67–90.

Sitorus, S. (2018). Upaya Hukum Dalam Perkara Perdata (Verzet, Banding, Kasasi, Peninjauan Kembali dan Derden Verzet). Hikmah, 15 (1), 63–71.

Slamet, S. R. (2013). Tuntutan Ganti Rugi Dalam Perbuatan Melawan Hukum: Suatu Perbandingan Dengan Wanprestasi. Lex Jurnalica, 10 (2), 18068.

Tamusala, C. H. (2018). Upaya Hukum Kasasi terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi Menurut Undang-Undang Pokok Kekuasaan Kehakiman Nomor 48 Tahun 2009. LEX CRIMEN, 7 (4).

Winarno, J. (2013). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Pada Perjanjian Jaminan Fidusia. Jurnal Independent, 1 (1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.30736/ji.v1i1.5

Yasir, M. (2016). Aspek Hukum Jaminan Fidusia. SALAM: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-I, 3, 75–92.