The Excessive Implementation of ISIC on the Obstruction in the Implementation of KBLI 2020

Authors

  • Fawwaz Aiman Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati, Indonesia
  • Nanda Mahardhika Septiansyah Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati, Indonesia
  • Isya Fahrizky Ardianto Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati, Indonesia
  • Endang Sutrisno Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati, Indonesia
  • Gusti Yosi Andri Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v3i6.613

Keywords:

ISIC, KBLI, Business License

Abstract

The Indonesian Standard Industrial Classification (KBLI) is a collection of business classification codes developed by the Central Statistics Agency (BPS) to categorize business and economic activities in Indonesia. Based on the International Standard Industrial Classification (ISIC), KBLI is integrated into the Online Single Submission (OSS) system, functioning as a tool for issuing business licenses and informing policy design. However, its implementation faces challenges, including the presence of irrelevant and non-functional codes, such as code 92000 for gambling activities, which contradict legal and social norms in Indonesia. This research aims to determine whether the adoption of KBLI over ISIC is excessive, leading to legal implications. A normative juridical approach or doctrinal research method is employed in this study, utilizing secondary data from the legal foundations of ISIC and KBLI, along with other related regulations. The results indicate that the excessive application of ISIC in KBLI has several negative impacts on its effectiveness. Codes irrelevant to the legal and social context in Indonesia render the issuance of business licenses ineffective and contradict the legal requirements stipulated in the Civil Code (KUHPerdata). The findings suggest that efforts are needed to enhance the effectiveness of KBLI in fulfilling its role as a classification system for business fields and economic activities in Indonesia. This can be achieved by considering relevance and local context to avoid unintended legal implications.

References

A’delina, S., Sutrisno, E., Rahman, A., & Sudarminto, S. (2022). Kajian Hukum Pencemaran Lingkungan Udara Berkaitan Dengan Usaha Mikro Kecil Dan Menengah Di Kabupaten Cirebon. Ajudikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 6(1), 89–104.

Andri, G. Y., & Djuariah, D. (2021). BENTUK BADAN USAHA APOTEK DITINJA U DARI HUKUM PERUSAHAAN. Hukum Responsif, 12(2).

Bo’a, F. Y. (2018). Pancasila sebagai sumber hukum dalam sistem hukum nasional. Jurnal Konstitusi, 15(1), 21–49.

Hidayat, R. (2015). Pemetaan Potensi Industri Kreatif Unggulan Madura. SITEKIN: Jurnal Sains, Teknologi Dan Industri, 12(2), 155–165.

Hilmi, M. F., Nirmala, M. S., Irawan, R. N., & Saputra, R. R. (2023). Kedudukan Klasifikasi Baku Lapangan Usaha Indonesia 69104 Terhadap Pihak Lain Sebagai Pelaku Usaha Kegiatan Notaris. Notaire, 6(3).

Jayaputeri, T., & Putra, M. F. M. (2023). Urgensi Penyempurnaan Sistem Norma Klasifikasi Kbli Tanpa Pengampu. JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan), 7(1), 294–301. https://doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v7i1.4162

Lestariningsih, E., Maharani, K., & Lestari, T. K. (2019). Measuring creative economy in Indonesia: Issues and challenges in data collection. Asia-Pacific Sustainable Development Journal, 2018(2), 99–117.

Manullang, E. F. M. (2015). The purpose of law, pancasila and legality according to Ernst Utrecht: A critical reflection. Indon. L. Rev., 5, 187.

Remaja, N. G. (2014). Makna hukum dan kepastian hukum. Kertha Widya, 2(1).

Siregar, F. Y. D. (2020). Aspek Hukum Penyederhanaan Perizinan Badan Usaha di Bidang Lingkungan Hidup dalam Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja. Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum, 7(2), 184–192.

Siregar, R. T., Rahmadana, M. F., Nainggolan, P., Basmar, E., & Siagian, V. (2021). Ekonomi industri. Yayasan Kita Menulis.

Statistik, I. B. P. (2005). Klasifikasi baku lapangan usaha Indonesia: KBLI. (No Title).

Statistik, P. B. P. (2020). Lampiran Peraturan Badan Pusat Statistik Nomor 2 Tahun 2020 Tentang Klasifikasi Baku Lapangan Usaha Indonesia.

Sutrisno, E., & Prayitno, A. (2023). LEGAL ESSENCE OF PANCASILA AS THE BASIS OF THE REALITY OF INDONESIAN LIFE: TO IMPROVE THE WELFARE OF THE FISHING COMMUNITY. Russian Law Journal, 11(9S), 290–296.

Suyadi, A. (2018). Pancasila sebagai Paradigma Pembangunan Hukum. Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu Dinamika Masalah Hukum Dan Keadilan, 9(1), 1–18.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-18

How to Cite

Aiman, F., Mahardhika Septiansyah, N. ., Fahrizky Ardianto, I. ., Sutrisno, E. ., & Yosi Andri, G. . (2024). The Excessive Implementation of ISIC on the Obstruction in the Implementation of KBLI 2020. Journal of World Science, 3(6), 582–589. https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v3i6.613