Relational Thinking And Problem Solution Strategies Beginning Algebra High School Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v1i8.86Keywords:
Algebra, early algebra, relational thinking, problem solving strategiesAbstract
Many students' difficulties in learning early algebra are associated with deficiencies in learning during the student's transition from arithmetic to algebra. relational thinking; a way of thinking that can be a gateway to algebraic thinking, is touted as one of the solutions to these difficulties. This study aims to determine the profile of relational thinking and early algebra problem solving strategies for junior high school students. Through the phenomenological design, the researcher selected six participants who fit the research criteria. The data analyzed refers to several theoretical frameworks on relational thinking from several experts. This study focuses on the indicators of interpreting the equals sign , using the relationship between numbers and applying the basic properties of number operations, as well as the methods students use in solving initial algebraic problems (algebraic forms and linear equations of one variable). As a result and its implication, students' relational thinking is seen in several items, namely the first 3 indicator items: each item is seen in S1, S4, and S6; The second 2 indicator items are visible on the S4; and the third 3 indicator items are seen in S1. The majority of subjects do computing dominantly and or apply the nature of operations based on procedural knowledge. Similarly, in solving early algebra problems, it was found that the dominant tendency of students to consider algebraic expressions from a procedural perspective rather than a structural perspective (based on mathematical concepts or structures). From these results, it is deemed necessary to develop relational thinking since students study arithmetic in elementary school, including by familiarizing students with number sentences in various forms and encouraging understanding of mathematical structures (relationships between elements and understanding of the nature of number operations).
References
Baiduri, B. (2015). Mathematics education students’ understanding of equal sign and equivalent equation. Asian Social Science, 11(25), 15–24. Google Scholar
Banerjee, R. (2011). Is Arithmetic Useful for the Teaching and Learning of Algebra? Contemporary Education Dialogue, 8(2), 137–159. Google Scholar
Blanton, M. L., & Kaput, J. J. (2005). Characterizing a classroom practice that promotes algebraic reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(5), 412–446. Google Scholar
Blanton, M., Stroud, R., Stephens, A., Gardiner, A. M., Stylianou, D. A., Knuth, E., Isler-Baykal, I., & Strachota, S. (2019). Does early algebra matter? The effectiveness of an early algebra intervention in grades 3 to 5. American Educational Research Journal, 56(5), 1930–1972. Google Scholar
Cai, J., & Moyer, J. (2008). Developing algebraic thinking in earlier grades: Some insights from international comparative studies. Algebra and Algebraic Thinking in School Mathematics, 70, 169–182. Google Scholar
Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., Franke, M. L., & Zeringue, J. K. (2005). Algebra in elementary school: Developing relational thinking. Zentralblatt Für Didaktik Der Mathematik, 37(1), 53–59. Google Scholar
Equality Relation and Structural Properties. (2010). Proceedings of CERME, 6. Google Scholar
Fisher, M. H., Thomas, J., Jong, C., Schack, E. O., & Dueber, D. (2019). Comparing preservice teachers’ professional noticing skills in elementary mathematics classrooms. School Science and Mathematics, 119(3), 142–149. Google Scholar
Harbour, K. E., Karp, K. S., & Lingo, A. S. (2016). Inquiry to action: Diagnosing and addressing students’ relational thinking about the equal sign. Teaching Exceptional Children, 49(2), 126–133. Google Scholar
Herscovics, N., & Linchevski, L. (1994). A cognitive gap between arithmetic and algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27(1), 59–78. Google Scholar
Kindrat, A. N., & Osana, H. P. (2018). The relationship between mental computation and relational thinking in the seventh grade. Fields Mathematics Education Journal, 3(1), 1–22. Google Scholar
Molina, M., & Ambrose, R. C. (2006). Fostering relational thinking while negotiating the meaning of the equals sign. Teaching Children Mathematics, 13(2), 111–117. Google Scholar
Muchoko, C., Jupri, A., & Prabawanto, S. (2019). Algebraic visualization difficulties of students in junior high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(3), 32108. Google Scholar
Pang, J., & Kim, J. (2018). Characteristics of Korean students’ early algebraic thinking: A generalized arithmetic perspective. In Teaching and learning algebraic thinking with 5-to 12-year-olds (pp. 141–165). Springer. Google Scholar
van Amerom, B. A. (2002). Reinvention of early algebra: Developmental research on the transition from arithmetic to algebra. Google Scholar
Warren, E. (2006). Comparative mathematical language in the elementary school: A longitudinal study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62(2), 169–189. Google Scholar
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal Of World Of Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
