Correlation Analysis of Household Food Consumption Expenditure with PPH (Standard Dietary Pattern) in Sembawa District, Banyuasin Regency

Authors

  • Maulidia Tri Yuliani Masters Program in Agribusiness, Faculty Agriculture University Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia
  • Andy Mulyana Faculty Agriculture University Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesian
  • Lifianthi Lifianthi Faculty Agriculture University Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesian

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v1i10.99

Keywords:

PPH, Food Consumption, Expenditure, Income, Household, Nutrition Recommendations.

Abstract

Introduction: This study analyzes the correlation of food consumption expenditure on the achievement of PPH scores which is influenced by several factors such as the number of household members, non-food expenditures, and length of education. Methods: This research method is using quantitativemethods. The method of determining the number of samples used is disproportionate stratified random sampling. The data analysis method regarding the correlation of food consumption expenditure to the value of PPH uses Spearman Rank correlation analysis and the method of analyzing factors that affect household food consumption expenditure using multiple linear regression analysis methods. Result: From the results of the study, it was found that the correlation value between food consumption expenditure and the achievement of the PPH score was 0.665, which means that it is strongly correlated and simultaneously the factors that affect food consumption expenditure affect because of the significant value of f is less than 0.005 which is worth 0.00 and partially which was tested with the T-test, the results were significant only on the high-income dummy variable, which was worth 0.23 which could be interpreted that households with high incomes had higher household consumption expenditures as much as 393,336,718 compared to food consumption expenditures of medium and low-income households. Conclusion: To formulate recommendations for efforts that can be made to achieve the optimal outcome for postpartum hemorrhage, participants are expected to be able to eat well-balanced nutritious foods of good nutritional value, focusing not only on quantity but also nutritional quality and nutrition. food content.

References

Analisis konsumsi pangan tingkat masyarakat mendukung pencapaian diversifikasi pangan. (2010). Gizi Indonesia, 33(1).

Argandi, S., Trimo, L., & Noor, T. I. (2018). Faktor–Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Pola Pangan Harapan (PPH) Di Kabupaten Bandung. Jurnal Agribisnis Terpadu, 11(2), 126–140.

Cahyani, G. I. (2008). Analisis faktor sosial ekonomi keluarga terhadap keanekaragaman konsumsi pangan berbasis agribisnis di kabupaten banyumas. Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Diponegoro.

Faradina, R., Iskandarini, I., & Lubis, S. N. (2018). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Pengeluaran Konsumsi Pangan Rumah Tangga (Studi Kasus: Desa Karang Gading, Kecamatan Secanggang, Kabupaten Langkat). Talenta Conference Series: Local Wisdom, Social, and Arts (LWSA), 1(1), 284–295.

Faridi, A., Trisutrisno, I., Irawan, A. M. A., Lusiana, S. A., Alfiah, E., Rahmawati, L. A., Doloksaribu, L. G., Suryana, S., Yunianto, A. E., & Sinaga, T. R. (2022). Survei Konsumsi Gizi. Yayasan Kita Menulis.

Ghozali, I. (2005). Analisis Multivariate dengan program SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Istighfarin, A. (2022). Implementasi Strategi IMC Industri Kecil Menengah Pada Produsen Makanan Beku. Jurnal Penelitian IPTEKS, 7(1), 11–18.

Khomsan, A. (2003). Pangan dan gizi untuk kesehatan.

Kurniawan, R. (2016). Analisis regresi. Prenada Media.

Mulyati, S., & Krisdianto, N. (2021). Penganekaragaman Konsumsi Pangan Berdasarkan Pola Pangan Harapan Di Wilayah Perdesaan Dan Perkotaan Kabupaten Serang Di Desa Kramatwatu Kabupaten Serang.

NORMALITA, H. (2018). Hubungan Pola Konsumsi Makan Keluarga Dengan Kejadian Gizi Kurang Pada Anak Paud Di Wilayah Uptd Puskesmas Ungaran Kecamatan Ungaran Barat. Universitas Ngudi Waluyo.

Nugroho, S., Akbar, S., & Vusvitasari, R. (2008). Kajian Hubungan Koefisien Korelasi Pearson (r), Spearman-rho (?), Kendall-Tau (?), Gamma (G), dan Somers. Gradien, 4(2), 372–381.

Pangan, B. K. (2015). Rencana Strategis Badan Ketahanan Pangan Tahun 2015-2019. Jakarta: Kementerian Pertanian.

Pangan, B. K. (2019). Laporan tahunan Badan Ketahanan Pangan tahun 2019. Jakarta: Kementerian Pertanian.

Purwati, P. (2021). Analisis Konsumsi Pangan Dan Pendapatan Rumah Tangga Peserta Program Pekarangan Pangan Lestari (P2L) Di Kota Pekanbaru. Universitas Islam Riau.

Rachman, H. P. S., & Ariani, M. (2016). Penganekaragaman konsumsi pangan di Indonesia: permasalahan dan implikasi untuk kebijakan dan program.

Rafiq, M. (2016). Pengaruh Pengeluaran Konsumsi Rumah Tangga, Investasi, dan Pengeluaran Pemerintah Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di Indonesia Tahun 2001: T1-2010: T4. Skripsi. Universitas Lampung.

Sarimunding, N., & Aisyah, S. (2018). Mengurai Relasi Konsumsi Rumah Tangga, Belanja Pemerintah dan Investasi Terhadap Akselerasi Pertumbuhan Ekonomi. EcceS (Economics, Social, and Development Studies), 5(2), 21–40.

SUKESI, K., & SHINTA, A. (2011). Diversifikasi Pangan Sebagai Salah Satu Strategi Peningkatan Gizi Berkualitas Di Kota Probolinggo (Studi Kasus Di Kecamatan Kanigaran). SEPA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 7(2).

Takahindangen, W. C., Rotinsulu, D. C., & Tumilaar, R. L. H. (2021). Analisis Perbedaan Pengeluaran Konsumsi Pengemudi Ojek Online Grabsebelum Dan Sesudah Menjadi Pengemudi Ojek Online Di Kota Manado. Jurnal Berkala Ilmiah Efisiensi, 21(1).

Taluke, J., Lesawengen, L., & Suwu, E. A. A. (2021). Pengaruh Status Sosial Ekonomi Orang Tua Terhadap Tingkat Keberhasilan Mahasiswa Di Desa Buo Kecamatan Loloda Kabupaten Halmahera Barat. Holistik, Journal Of Social and Culture.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-18

How to Cite

Tri Yuliani, M., Mulyana, A., & Lifianthi, L. (2022). Correlation Analysis of Household Food Consumption Expenditure with PPH (Standard Dietary Pattern) in Sembawa District, Banyuasin Regency. Journal of World Science, 1(10), 917–935. https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v1i10.99