Retrofitting Digestate Recirculation System to Improve Methane Yield in Anaerobic Digestion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v5i6.1675Keywords:
Food waste, Recirculated Digestate, Modelling, Anaerobic Digestion, MethaneAbstract
Digestate recirculation has gained attention as a promising strategy to enhance methane production. By reintroducing acclimatized microorganisms and residual biodegradable compounds into Anaerobic digestion (AD) system, this approach can potentially improve process stability and biogas quality. To systematically evaluate these effects, modeling and simulation offer a reliable framework for assessing methane yield. This study aims to assess the feasibility of simulating methane production from an anaerobic digestion reactor using food waste (FW) as the primary feedstock, incorporating a digestate recirculation system. It is hypothesized that recirculated digestate, due to its high organic content and catalytic properties, can effectively enhance biogas quality and optimize energy recovery from the system. A process flow diagram was developed in Aspen Plus® version, incorporating the four main biochemical stages: hydrolysis, acidogenesis, acetogenesis, and methanogenesis. The Non-Random Two-Liquid (NRTL) thermodynamic model was applied to represent polar mixture components, and a total of 46 governing equations were implemented to describe anaerobic digestion kinetics and mass balances. Model performance was validated against data reported in previous studies. Simulation results indicate that increasing the recirculation ratio up to 30% into feedstock mixture enhances both methane up to 25% higher compared to baseline and biogas production up to 32% higher than baseline. The findings demonstrate that the usage of recirculated digestate could improve the biogas quality. The developed modeling framework shows strong potential for scalability and can be applied to optimize methane production in anaerobic digestion systems with similar feedstock compositions and operating conditions.
References
Adesiyan, A. I., Ayeleru, O. O., Modekwe, H. U., Nyam, T. T., Ameh, V. I., & Ramatsa, I. M. (2024). Effects of process parameters on biogas production from food waste using aspen plus simulator. Waste Management Bulletin, 2(3), 289–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wmb.2024.08.010
Aguilar, M. C., Wang, Y. D., Roskilly, T., Pathare, P. B., & Lamidi, R. O. (2017). Biogas from anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and primary sludge for cogeneration of power and heat. Energy Procedia, 142, 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.012
Anaya Menacho, W., Mazid, A. M., & Das, N. (2022). Modelling and analysis for biogas production process simulation of food waste using Aspen Plus. Fuel, 309, 122058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122058
Ariunbaatar, J., Scotto Di Perta, E., Panico, A., Frunzo, L., Esposito, G., Lens, P. N. L., & Pirozzi, F. (2015). Effect of ammoniacal nitrogen on one-stage and two-stage anaerobic digestion of food waste. Waste Management, 38, 388–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.12.001
Beale, D. J., Karpe, A. V., McLeod, J. D., Gondalia, S. V., Muster, T. H., Othman, M. Z., Palombo, E. A., & Joshi, D. (2016). An ‘omics’ approach towards the characterisation of laboratory scale anaerobic digesters treating municipal sewage sludge. Water Research, 88, 346–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.10.029
Bhatt, A. H., & Tao, L. (2020). Economic Perspectives of Biogas Production via Anaerobic Digestion. Bioengineering, 7(3), 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering7030074
Bonk, F., Popp, D., Weinrich, S., Sträuber, H., Kleinsteuber, S., Harms, H., & Centler, F. (2018). Ammonia Inhibition of Anaerobic Volatile Fatty Acid Degrading Microbial Communities. Frontiers in Microbiology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02921
Browne, J. D., & Murphy, J. D. (2013). Assessment of the resource associated with biomethane from food waste. Applied Energy, 104, 170–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.11.017
Budhraja, N. (2024). Simulation and optimization for biohydrogen production potential of various organic waste via anaerobic digestion. Fuel, 360, 130563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.130563
Ekstrand, E.-M., Björn, A., Karlsson, A., Schnürer, A., Kanders, L., Yekta, S. S., Karlsson, M., & Moestedt, J. (2022). Identifying targets for increased biogas production through chemical and organic matter characterization of digestate from full-scale biogas plants: what remains and why? Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, 15(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-022-02103-3
Fisgativa, H., Tremier, A., & Dabert, P. (2016). Characterizing the variability of food waste quality: A need for efficient valorisation through anaerobic digestion. Waste Management, 50, 264–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.01.041
García-Diéguez, C., Bernard, O., & Roca, E. (2013). Reducing the Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 for its application to an industrial wastewater treatment plant treating winery effluent wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 132, 244–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.12.166
Han, W., Liu, D. N., Shi, Y. W., Tang, J. H., Li, Y. F., & Ren, N. Q. (2015). Biohydrogen production from food waste hydrolysate using continuous mixed immobilized sludge reactors. Bioresource Technology, 180, 54–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.12.067
Jankauskien?, J., Laužik?, K., & Kaupait?, S. (2024). The Use of Anaerobic Digestate for Greenhouse Horticulture. Agronomy, 14(10), 2437. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14102437
Kiran, E. U., & Trzcinski, A. P. (2017). Optimizing the Conversion of Food Waste to Sugars using Fungal Enzymes Cronicon EC MICROBIOLOGY Optimizing the Conversion of Food Waste to Sugars using Fungal Enzymes. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320215895
Liu, C., Li, H., Zhang, Y., & Liu, C. (2016). Improve biogas production from low-organic-content sludge through high-solids anaerobic co-digestion with food waste. Bioresource Technology, 219, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.07.130
Lopez, V. M., De la Cruz, F. B., & Barlaz, M. A. (2016). Chemical composition and methane potential of commercial food wastes. Waste Management, 56, 477–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.07.024
Mihi, M., Ouhammou, B., Aggour, M., Daouchi, B., Naaim, S., El Mers, E. M., & Kousksou, T. (2024). Modeling and forecasting biogas production from anaerobic digestion process for sustainable resource energy recovery. Heliyon, 10(19), e38472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38472
Mohammadianroshanfekr, M., Pazoki, M., Pejman, M. B., Ghasemzadeh, R., & Pazoki, A. (2024). Kinetic modeling and optimization of biogas production from food waste and cow manure co-digestion. Results in Engineering, 24, 103477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103477
Möller, K. (2015). Effects of anaerobic digestion on soil carbon and nitrogen turnover, N emissions, and soil biological activity. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 35(3), 1021–1041. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0284-3
Moonsamy, T. A., Rajauria, G., Priyadarshini, A., & Jansen, M. A. K. (2024). Food waste: analysis of the complex and variable composition of a promising feedstock for valorisation. Food and Bioproducts Processing, 148, 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2024.08.012
Müller, F., Maack, G.-C., & Buescher, W. (2017). Effects of Biogas Substrate Recirculation on Methane Yield and Efficiency of a Liquid-Manure-Based Biogas Plant. Energies, 10(3), 325. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10030325
Pagliaccia, P., Gallipoli, A., Gianico, A., Gironi, F., Montecchio, D., Pastore, C., di Bitonto, L., & Braguglia, C. M. (2019). Variability of food waste chemical composition: Impact of thermal pre-treatment on lignocellulosic matrix and anaerobic biodegradability. Journal of Environmental Management, 236, 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.084
Poe, N. E., Yu, D., Jin, Q., Ponder, M. A., Stewart, A. C., Ogejo, J. A., Wang, H., & Huang, H. (2020). Compositional variability of food wastes and its effects on acetone-butanol-ethanol fermentation. Waste Management, 107, 150–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.03.035
Qian, S., Chen, L., Xu, S., Zeng, C., Lian, X., Xia, Z., & Zou, J. (2025). Research on Methane-Rich Biogas Production Technology by Anaerobic Digestion Under Carbon Neutrality: A Review. Sustainability, 17(4), 1425. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041425
Rajendran, K., Kankanala, H. R., Lundin, M., & Taherzadeh, M. J. (2014). A novel process simulation model (PSM) for anaerobic digestion using Aspen Plus. Bioresource Technology, 168, 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.051
Salama, E.-S., Saha, S., Kurade, M. B., Dev, S., Chang, S. W., & Jeon, B.-H. (2019). Recent trends in anaerobic co-digestion: Fat, oil, and grease (FOG) for enhanced biomethanation. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 70, 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2018.08.002
Selvam, A., Ilamathi, P. M. K., Udayakumar, M., Murugesan, K., Banu, J. R., Khanna, Y., & Wong, J. (2021). Food Waste Properties. In Current Developments in Biotechnology and Bioengineering (pp. 11–41). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819148-4.00002-6
Shen, F., Yuan, H., Pang, Y., Chen, S., Zhu, B., Zou, D., Liu, Y., Ma, J., Yu, L., & Li, X. (2013). Performances of anaerobic co-digestion of fruit & vegetable waste (FVW) and food waste (FW): Single-phase vs. two-phase. Bioresource Technology, 144, 80–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.06.099
Slopiecka, K., Liberti, F., Massoli, S., Bartocci, P., & Fantozzi, F. (2022). Chemical and physical characterization of food waste to improve its use in anaerobic digestion plants. Energy Nexus, 5, 100049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2022.100049
Song, L., Yang, D., Liu, R., Liu, S., & Dai, X. (2023). The dissolution of polysaccharides and amino acids enhanced lactic acid production from household food waste during pretreatment process. Science of The Total Environment, 864, 161068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161068
Vaneeckhaute, C., Claeys, F. H. A., Tack, F. M. G., Meers, E., Belia, E., & Vanrolleghem, P. A. (2018). Development, implementation, and validation of a generic nutrient recovery model (NRM) library. Environmental Modelling & Software, 99, 170–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.09.002
Wang, L., Aziz, T. N., & de los Reyes, F. L. (2013). Determining the limits of anaerobic co-digestion of thickened waste activated sludge with grease interceptor waste. Water Research, 47(11), 3835–3844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.04.003
Weiland, P. (2010). Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 85(4), 849–860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-2246-7
Xue, S., Wang, Y., Lyu, X., Zhao, N., Song, J., Wang, X., & Yang, G. (2020). Interactive effects of carbohydrate, lipid, protein composition and carbon/nitrogen ratio on biogas production of different food wastes. Bioresource Technology, 312, 123566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123566
Yan, B. H., Selvam, A., & Wong, J. W. C. (2016). Innovative method for increased methane recovery from two-phase anaerobic digestion of food waste through reutilization of acidogenic off-gas in methanogenic reactor. Bioresource Technology, 217, 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.116
Yang, Z., Yang, D., Hua, Y., Chen, X., Wang, X., Gong, H., Dong, B., Li, X., & Dai, X. (2024). Dual optimization in anaerobic digestion of rice straw: Effects HRT and OLR coupling on methane production in one-stage and two-stage systems. Journal of Environmental Management, 370, 123041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123041
Zhang, W., Xing, W., & Li, R. (2018). Real-time recovery strategies for volatile fatty acid-inhibited anaerobic digestion of food waste for methane production. Bioresource Technology, 265, 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.05.098
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Elang Nur Reiz M N Insaani, Hafif Dafiqurrohman , Adi Surjosatyo , Cindy Rianti Priadi , Baskoro Lokahita
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
