Determination of the Equivalent Ratio of Optimum Gasifier with Several Types of Biomass

Authors

  • Tito Sumirat Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • M. Rizky Pradana Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Adi Surjosatyo Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v2i6.327

Keywords:

biomass, syngas, gasifier

Abstract

This study aims to create a CFD model aligned with lab test results from previous studies, conduct simulation tests using several types of biomass as input and optimize the operating parameters of various types of biomass to produce optimum syngas. The method used in this research is literature study and modelling using Ansys Fluent software. The results of this study indicate that biomass is a source of new and renewable energy (EBT) which has abundant potential in Indonesia, but its use could be more optimal. Biomass gasification is one of the most promising techniques used to convert solid fuels into useful gaseous fuels, which can be widely used in many households and industrial applications such as power generation and internal combustion engines. This research implies that it can help determine the optimum equivalence ratio and feed rate for a gasifier that utilizes various types of biomass. By finding the optimal combination, the composting process can achieve higher energy efficiency, resulting in more energy being generated from the biomass used. Additionally, by knowing the appropriate equivalence ratio and feed rate, this research can assist in optimizing the biomass composting process in the gasifier.

References

Ardilasari, L. A. (2023). Pengaruh Perekat Daun Biduri (Calatropis gigantea) pada Briket Tongkol Jagung dengan Penambahan Plastik Low Density Polyethylene. Politeknik Negeri Jember.

Basu, P. (2013). Chapter 3 - Biomass Characteristics (P. B. T.-B. G. Basu Pyrolysis and Torrefaction (Second Edition) (ed.); pp. 47–86). Academic Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-396488-5.00003-4

Basu, P. (2018). Biomass gasification, pyrolysis and torrefaction: practical design and theory. Academic press.

Bridgwater, A. V, Toft, A. J., & Brammer, J. G. (2022). A techno-economic comparison of power production by biomass fast pyrolysis with gasification and combustion. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 6(3), 181–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-0321(01)00010-7

Chhiti, Y., & Kemiha, M. (2013). Thermal conversion of biomass, pyrolysis and gasification. International Journal of Engineering and Science (IJES), 2(3), 75–85.

Gray, D. (2017). Major gasifiers for IGCC systems. In Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) Technologies (pp. 305–355). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100167-7.00008-1

Kasmaniar, K., Yana, S., Nelly, N., Fitriliana, F., Susanti, S., Hanum, F., & Rahmatullah, A. (2023). Pengembangan Energi Terbarukan Biomassa dari Sumber Pertanian, Perkebunan dan Hasil Hutan: Kajian Pengembangan dan Kendalanya. Jurnal Serambi Engineering, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.32672/jse.v8i1.5668

Lukmadi, F. K., & Sitabuana, T. H. (2022). COP26: Peran Indonesia dalam Dinamika Climate Action terhadap Poros Penanggulangan Perubahan Iklim di Indonesia. PROSIDING SERINA, 2(1), 257–262. https://doi.org/10.24912/pserina.v2i1.18538

Morris, J. D., Daood, S. S., Chilton, S., & Nimmo, W. (2018). Mechanisms and mitigation of agglomeration during fluidized bed combustion of biomass: A review. Fuel, 230, 452–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.04.098

Murugan, P. C., & Sekhar, S. J. (2017). Species–Transport CFD model for the gasification of rice husk (Oryza Sativa) using downdraft gasifier. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 139, 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.05.004

Pah, J. M. (2022). Peningkatan Kualitas Bahan Bakar Padat dari Biomassa Bambu melalui Torefaksi. Universitas Lampung.

Pang, S. (2016). Fuel flexible gas production: Biomass, coal and bio-solid wastes. In Fuel flexible energy generation (pp. 241–269). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-78242-378-2.00009-2

Parinduri, L., & Parinduri, T. (2020). Konversi biomassa sebagai sumber energi terbarukan. JET (Journal of Electrical Technology), 5(2), 88–92.

Reddy, K. V., Satya Sree, N. R., Ranjit, P., & Maddela, N. R. (2023). Chapter 23 - Biomass waste and feedstock as a source of renewable energy (M. P. B. T.-G. A. to A. F. for a S. F. Shah (ed.); pp. 325–334). Elsevier. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824318-3.00033-3

Simorangkir, D. P., & Syaiful, B. (n.d.). Pirolisis Tandan Kosong Sawit menjadi Bio-Oil dengan Katalis HZSM-5 melalui Proses Hidrodeoksigenasi.

Thomson, R., Kwong, P., Ahmad, E., & Nigam, K. D. P. (2020). Clean syngas from small commercial biomass gasifiers; a review of gasifier development, recent advances and performance evaluation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45(41), 21087–21111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.05.160

Vassilev, S. V, Vassileva, C. G., & Vassilev, V. S. (2015). Advantages and disadvantages of composition and properties of biomass in comparison with coal: An overview. Fuel, 158, 330–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.05.050

Warnecke, R. (2020). Gasification of biomass: comparison of fixed bed and fluidized bed gasifier. Biomass and Bioenergy, 18(6), 489–497.

Wheeldon, J. M., & Thimsen, D. (2013). Economic evaluation of circulating fluidized bed combustion (CFBC) power generation plants. In Fluidized Bed Technologies for Near-Zero Emission Combustion and Gasification (pp. 620–638). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857098801.2.620

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

Sumirat, T., Pradana, M. R. ., & Surjosatyo, A. . (2023). Determination of the Equivalent Ratio of Optimum Gasifier with Several Types of Biomass. Journal of World Science, 2(6), 842–853. https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v2i6.327