Analysis of Human Error Potential as a Cause of Work Accident using Sherpa and Heart Method in The Cement Industry

Authors

  • Annisa Maulidya Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
  • Katharina Oginawati Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
  • Suharyanto Suharyanto Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jawa Barat, Indoensia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v2i9.408

Keywords:

human error, workplace accidents, sherpa, heart

Abstract

This study was conducted to analyze the potential for human error that can cause workplace accidents in the cement industry of PT.X. The study was conducted by conducting observations, interviews, and distributing questionnaires in the mining area and production area. Questionnaires were distributed to 96 people who were mining heavy equipment operators and production operators. The research method used through Human Reliability Analysis with the Hierarchial Task Analysis (HTA) method, knowing the types of errors that occur using the SHERPA method, then calculating the probability of human errors that occur with the HEART method. Based on the results of research using the SHERPA method, the most common types of errors in mining areas and production areas are action errors (60,25%). The type of error that occurs is due to negligence in using personal protective equipment and the work process is not completed properly. Based on research using the HEART method, the greatest opportunity for human error in the mining department is cleaning with dozer with a value of 1,056 and in the production department is in the area of cleaning work with a value of 1,89. Based on the error producing conditions questionnaire (EPCs) for workers in the mining department the most common cause of error is poor equipment / instruments while for workers in the production department is a mismatch between the imagined risk and the actual risk. The recommendations given to companies are to improve work equipment, improve visual displays and provide an appropriate assessment checklist.

References

Abukhashabah, E., Summan, A., & Balkhyour, M. (2019). Causes of occupational accidents and injuries in construction industry in Jeddah City. JKAU Met. Environ. Arid Land Agric. Sci, 28, 105–116.

Arifin, J. (2017). SPSS 24 untuk Penelitian dan Skripsi. Elex Media Komputindo.

Asih, E. W., Winarni, W., & Sekarini, D. (2019). ANALISIS HUMAN RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT OPERATOR PAPER MACHINE DENGAN METODE FUZZY HEART. Jurnal Teknologi, 12(2), 137–145.

Bolton, M. L., Bass, E. J., & Siminiceanu, R. I. (2013). Using formal verification to evaluate human-automation interaction: A review. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 43(3), 488–503.

Chi, S., Han, S., & Kim, D. Y. (2013). Relationship between unsafe working conditions and workers’ behavior and impact of working conditions on injury severity in US construction industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(7), 826–838.

Choi, B., & Lee, S. (2018). An empirically based agent-based model of the sociocognitive process of construction workers’ safety behavior. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(2), 4017102.

Dhillon, B. S. (2013). Human reliability: with human factors. Elsevier.

Dreger, F. A., Englund, M., Hartsch, F., Wagner, T., Jaeger, D., Björheden, R., & Rinkenauer, G. (2023). Hierarchical Task Analysis (HTA) for Application Research on Operator Work Practices and the Design of Training and Support Systems for Forestry Harvester. Forests, 14(2), 424.

Farida, N. (2016). Pengaruh Kualitas Bahan Baku Terhadap Kualitas Hasil Produksi (Studi Pada CV Mebel Bima Karya Kabupaten Blitar). Akuntabilitas: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Ekonomi, 9(2), 1.

Fonna, N. (2019). Pengembangan Revolusi Industri 4.0 dalam Berbagai Bidang. Guepedia.

Landi, R. G., Montedo, U. B., & Lahoz, C. H. N. (2022). Using systems theory for additional risk detection in boiler explosions in Brazil. Safety Science, 152, 105761.

Li, J., Wang, H., Xie, Y., & Zeng, W. (2020). Human error identification and analysis for shield machine operation using an adapted TRACEr method. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(8), 4020095.

Liang, Q., Leung, M., & Ahmed, K. (2021). How adoption of coping behaviors determines construction workers’ safety: A quantitative and qualitative investigation. Safety Science, 133, 105035.

Liao, P.-C., Ma, Z., & Chong, H.-Y. (2018). Identifying effective management factors across human errors–A case in elevator installation. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 22, 3204–3214.

Pouya, A. B., & Habibi, E. (2015). Using cream techniques for investigating human error with cognitive ergonomics approach in the control room of cement industry. IJBPAS, 4(3), 1480–1484.

Wong, F. K.-W., Chiang, Y.-H., Abidoye, F. A., & Liang, S. (2019). Interrelation between human factor–related accidents and work patterns in construction industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(5), 4019021.

Xia, N., Xie, Q., Hu, X., Wang, X., & Meng, H. (2020). A dual perspective on risk perception and its effect on safety behavior: A moderated mediation model of safety motivation, and supervisor’s and coworkers’ safety climate. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 134, 105350.

Zahroh, D. A. S. (2023). Analisis Human Error Sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Kecelakaan Pada Bidang Maritim: Literatur Review. Nanggroe: Jurnal Pengabdian Cendikia, 2(3).

Downloads

Published

2023-09-28

How to Cite

Maulidya, A., Oginawati, K. ., & Suharyanto, S. (2023). Analysis of Human Error Potential as a Cause of Work Accident using Sherpa and Heart Method in The Cement Industry. Journal of World Science, 2(9), 1387–1397. https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v2i9.408