Factors That Influence Innovative Work Behavior of Y Generation Employees at The Indonesia Financial Services Authority

Authors

  • Lasmaida Gultom Universitas Persada Indonesia Y.A.I, Indonesia
  • Katarina Nawan Hatiningsi Universitas Persada Indonesia Y.A.I, Indonesia
  • Linus Kali Palindangan Universitas Persada Indonesia Y.A.I, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v1i8.78

Keywords:

innovative work behavior, psychological empowerment, proactive behavior, workplace spirituality

Abstract

This study aims to examine a structural effect model of proactive behavior and workplace spirituality on the innovative work behavior of Generation Y employees at the Indonesia Financial Services Authority (IFSA) mediated by psychological empowerment. The variables in this study are exogenous variables consisting of proactive behavior and workplace spirituality, endogenous variable is innovative work behavior. Psychological empowerment is a mediator. As a hypothesis in this study is a theoretical model of the influence of proactive behavior and workplace spirituality on the innovative work behavior mediated by psychological empowerment fit with the empirical data on Gen Yof IFSA. Data collection techniques are done by self-report measurement, using the scale of proactive behavior, scale of workplace spirituality, scale of psychological empowerment and scale of innovative work behavior. Data analysis used the Structural Equation Model (SEM) with the help of LISREL analysis. The sampling technique was carried out by using simple random sampling with 279 respondents. The results showed that proactive behavior and workplace spirituality have positive and significant effect on innovative work behavior mediated by psychological empowerment, with an RMSEA coefficient of 0.010 and with an GFI coefficient of 0.97, so the hypothesis was accepted.

References

Abdullatif, T. N. (2017). THE FACTORS INFLUENCING INNOVATIVE WORK BEHAVIOR AMONG ACADEMICIANS IN IRAQ.

Afsar, B., & Badir, Y. (2017). Workplace spirituality, perceived organizational support and innovative work behavior: The mediating effects of person-organization fit. Journal of Workplace Learning.

Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 367–403.

Arefin, M. S., Arif, I., & Raquib, M. (2015). High-performance work systems and proactive behavior: The mediating role of psychological empowerment. International Journal of Business and Management, 10(3), 132–140.

Ayandele, I. A., & Nnamseh, M. P. (2014). Hackman and Oldham job characteristics model (JCM) and Akwa Ibom state civil servants’ performance. Canadian Social Science, 10(2), 89–97.

Bantha, T., & Nayak, U. (2020). The relation of workplace spirituality with employees’ innovative work behaviour: the mediating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Indian Business Research.

Birdi, K., Leach, D., & Magadley, W. (2016). The relationship of individual capabilities and environmental support with different facets of designers’ innovative behavior. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(1), 19–35.

De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23–36.

Erkutlu, H. (2014). Exploring the moderating effect of psychological capital on the relationship between narcissism and psychological well-being. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150, 1148–1156.

Hair, J. F. (2009). Multivariate data analysis.

Korn, K. J. M. (2010). A second look at generational differences in the workforce: Implications for HR and talent management. People and Strategy, 33(2), 50.

Meier, J., & Crocker, M. (2010). Generation Y in the workforce: Managerial challenges. The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning, 6(1), 68.

Milliman, J., Czaplewski, A. J., & Ferguson, J. (2003). Workplace spirituality and employee work attitudes: An exploratory empirical assessment. Journal of Organizational Change Management.

Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2010). Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633–662.

Spreitzer, G. M. (2008). Taking stock: A review of more than twenty years of research on empowerment at work. Handbook of Organizational Behavior, 1, 54–72.

Downloads

Published

2022-08-23

How to Cite

Gultom, L., Nawan Hatiningsi, K. ., & Kali Palindangan, L. . (2022). Factors That Influence Innovative Work Behavior of Y Generation Employees at The Indonesia Financial Services Authority . Journal of World Science, 1(8), 570–578. https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v1i8.78

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 8 (2022): Journal of World Science

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Journal Of World Of Science

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.